Cargando…

Laparoscopic Loop Ileostomy Reversal: Reducing Morbidity While Improving Functional Outcomes

INTRODUCTION: Loop ileostomy reduces the morbidity associated with pelvic sepsis. However, its reversal carries a 10% to 30% complication rate. We present our technique for laparoscopic ileostomy closure. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of subjects undergoing laparoscopic-assisted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Russek, Karla, George, Jojy M., Zafar, Naveed, Cuevas-Estandia, Pedro, Franklin, Morris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3340955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22643501
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680811X13176785203950
_version_ 1782231483035942912
author Russek, Karla
George, Jojy M.
Zafar, Naveed
Cuevas-Estandia, Pedro
Franklin, Morris
author_facet Russek, Karla
George, Jojy M.
Zafar, Naveed
Cuevas-Estandia, Pedro
Franklin, Morris
author_sort Russek, Karla
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Loop ileostomy reduces the morbidity associated with pelvic sepsis. However, its reversal carries a 10% to 30% complication rate. We present our technique for laparoscopic ileostomy closure. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of subjects undergoing laparoscopic-assisted loop ileostomy closure between 2006 and 2009. Operating time, length of hospital stay, return of bowel function, and complication rates were assessed. RESULTS: There were 24 (13 males) patients. Average age was 63 with a BMI of 25.9. Eighteen (75%) had a planned loop ileostomy, and 6 (25%) were emergent. Average time to reversal was 135 days. Average length of surgery was 79 minutes (range, 48 to 186), average stay was 4 days and return to bowel function was 3.6 days. We had no wound infections. Our complication rate was 29% (n=7), and reoperation rate was 12.5% (n=3). Only 1 major complication occurred, an anastomotic dehiscence. CONCLUSION: A thorough, well-visualized lysis of adhesions and mobilization of the stoma and surrounding small bowel is the main advantage of our approach. We had no wound infections and no reoperation for bowel obstruction, which we feel is a direct advantage of our technique. Our complication rate and surgical time are comparable to those of the open technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3340955
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33409552012-05-14 Laparoscopic Loop Ileostomy Reversal: Reducing Morbidity While Improving Functional Outcomes Russek, Karla George, Jojy M. Zafar, Naveed Cuevas-Estandia, Pedro Franklin, Morris JSLS Scientific Papers INTRODUCTION: Loop ileostomy reduces the morbidity associated with pelvic sepsis. However, its reversal carries a 10% to 30% complication rate. We present our technique for laparoscopic ileostomy closure. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of subjects undergoing laparoscopic-assisted loop ileostomy closure between 2006 and 2009. Operating time, length of hospital stay, return of bowel function, and complication rates were assessed. RESULTS: There were 24 (13 males) patients. Average age was 63 with a BMI of 25.9. Eighteen (75%) had a planned loop ileostomy, and 6 (25%) were emergent. Average time to reversal was 135 days. Average length of surgery was 79 minutes (range, 48 to 186), average stay was 4 days and return to bowel function was 3.6 days. We had no wound infections. Our complication rate was 29% (n=7), and reoperation rate was 12.5% (n=3). Only 1 major complication occurred, an anastomotic dehiscence. CONCLUSION: A thorough, well-visualized lysis of adhesions and mobilization of the stoma and surrounding small bowel is the main advantage of our approach. We had no wound infections and no reoperation for bowel obstruction, which we feel is a direct advantage of our technique. Our complication rate and surgical time are comparable to those of the open technique. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3340955/ /pubmed/22643501 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680811X13176785203950 Text en © 2011 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Scientific Papers
Russek, Karla
George, Jojy M.
Zafar, Naveed
Cuevas-Estandia, Pedro
Franklin, Morris
Laparoscopic Loop Ileostomy Reversal: Reducing Morbidity While Improving Functional Outcomes
title Laparoscopic Loop Ileostomy Reversal: Reducing Morbidity While Improving Functional Outcomes
title_full Laparoscopic Loop Ileostomy Reversal: Reducing Morbidity While Improving Functional Outcomes
title_fullStr Laparoscopic Loop Ileostomy Reversal: Reducing Morbidity While Improving Functional Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic Loop Ileostomy Reversal: Reducing Morbidity While Improving Functional Outcomes
title_short Laparoscopic Loop Ileostomy Reversal: Reducing Morbidity While Improving Functional Outcomes
title_sort laparoscopic loop ileostomy reversal: reducing morbidity while improving functional outcomes
topic Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3340955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22643501
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680811X13176785203950
work_keys_str_mv AT russekkarla laparoscopicloopileostomyreversalreducingmorbiditywhileimprovingfunctionaloutcomes
AT georgejojym laparoscopicloopileostomyreversalreducingmorbiditywhileimprovingfunctionaloutcomes
AT zafarnaveed laparoscopicloopileostomyreversalreducingmorbiditywhileimprovingfunctionaloutcomes
AT cuevasestandiapedro laparoscopicloopileostomyreversalreducingmorbiditywhileimprovingfunctionaloutcomes
AT franklinmorris laparoscopicloopileostomyreversalreducingmorbiditywhileimprovingfunctionaloutcomes