Cargando…

Scientific Value of Systematic Reviews: Survey of Editors of Core Clinical Journals

BACKGROUND: Synthesizing research evidence using systematic and rigorous methods has become a key feature of evidence-based medicine and knowledge translation. Systematic reviews (SRs) may or may not include a meta-analysis depending on the suitability of available data. They are often being critici...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Meerpohl, Joerg J., Herrle, Florian, Antes, Gerd, von Elm, Erik
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3341385/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22563469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035732

Ejemplares similares

Correction: Scientific Value of Systematic Reviews: Survey of Editors of Core Clinical Journals
por: Meerpohl, Joerg J., et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Attitudes of editors of core clinical journals about whether systematic reviews are original research: a mixed-methods study
por: Krnic Martinic, Marina, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Are pediatric Open Access journals promoting good publication practice? An analysis of author instructions
por: Meerpohl, Joerg J, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Reporting of eligibility criteria of randomised trials: cohort study comparing trial protocols with subsequent articles
por: Blümle, Anette, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Detecting, quantifying and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analyses: protocol of a systematic review on methods
por: Mueller, Katharina Felicitas, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Core competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals: consensus statement
por: Moher, David, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Guidance in author instructions of hematology and oncology journals: A cross sectional and longitudinal study
por: Toews, Ingrid, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Bias in dissemination of clinical research findings: structured OPEN framework of what, who and why, based on literature review and expert consensus
por: Bassler, Dirk, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Do urology journals enforce trial registration? A cross-sectional study of published trials
por: Kunath, Frank, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Tamoxifen for the management of breast events induced by non-steroidal antiandrogens in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review
por: Kunath, Frank, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Fate of Clinical Research Studies after Ethical Approval – Follow-Up of Study Protocols until Publication
por: Blümle, Anette, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Extent of Non-Publication in Cohorts of Studies Approved by Research Ethics Committees or Included in Trial Registries
por: Schmucker, Christine, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Defining publication bias: protocol for a systematic review of highly cited articles and proposal for a new framework
por: Müller, Katharina Felicitas, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Should Language Matter Less to Journals?
por: von Elm, Erik
Publicado: (2006)

An international survey and modified Delphi process revealed editors’ perceptions, training needs, and ratings of competency-related statements for the development of core competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals
por: Galipeau, James, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Early versus deferred androgen suppression therapy for patients with lymph node-positive prostate cancer after local therapy with curative intent: a systematic review
por: Kunath, Frank, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

A scoping review of competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals
por: Galipeau, James, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

The role of scientific journal editors during the COVID-19 pandemic()
por: Matias-Guiu, J.
Publicado: (2020)

Role and importance of journal reader: Scientific contribution of letter to editor
por: Kumar, Raman
Publicado: (2022)

Specialist palliative care services for adults with advanced, incurable illness in hospital, hospice, or community settings—protocol for a systematic review
por: Gaertner, Jan, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Willingness to participate in, support or carry out scientific studies for benefit assessment of available medical interventions: A stakeholder survey
por: Stadelmaier, Julia, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Have Online International Medical Journals Made Local Journals Obsolete?
por: Ofori-Adjei, David, et al.
Publicado: (2006)

Reply to Role and importance of journal reader: Scientific contribution of letter to editor
por: Das, Nikunja K., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Publication bias in animal research: a systematic review protocol
por: Briel, Matthias, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Effect of specialist palliative care services on quality of life in adults with advanced incurable illness in hospital, hospice, or community settings: systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Gaertner, Jan, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Protocol for a systematic review on the extent of non-publication of research studies and associated study characteristics
por: Portalupi, Susan, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Systematic review finds that study data not published in full text articles have unclear impact on meta-analyses results in medical research
por: Schmucker, Christine M., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

A study on literature obsolescence and core journals’ cost-benefit in citations of the ‘Scientific Medical Journal of Ahwaz’
por: Zare-Farashbandi, Firoozeh, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

A protocol for a systematic review on the impact of unpublished studies and studies published in the gray literature in meta-analyses
por: Schmucker, Christine, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

How Psychiatry Journals Support the Unbiased Translation of Clinical Research. A Cross-Sectional Study of Editorial Policies
por: Knüppel, Hannes, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

The CROWN initiative: journal editors invite researchers to develop core outcomes in women’s health
por: Khan, Khalid, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

The CROWN Initiative: journal editors invite researchers to develop core outcomes in women's health
Publicado: (2014)

The CROWN Initiative: journal editors invite researchers to develop core outcomes in women’s health
por: Khan, Khalid, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

The CROWN initiative: journal editors invite researchers to develop core outcomes in women’s health
por: Khan, Khalid, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

The CROWN Initiative: journal editors invite researchers to develop core outcomes in women’s health
por: Khan, Khalid, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

The CROWN Initiative: journal editors invite researchers to develop core outcomes in women’s health
por: Khan, Khalid
Publicado: (2015)

The CROWN Initiative: journal editors invite researchers to develop core outcomes in women’s health
por: Khan, Khalid
Publicado: (2015)

The CROWN Initiative: Journal Editors Invite Researchers to Develop Core Outcomes in Women’s Health
Publicado: (2014)

The CROWN Initiative: journal editors invite researchers to develop core outcomes in women’s health
por: Khan, Khalid
Publicado: (2016)

The CROWN Initiative: journal editors invite researchers to develop core outcomes in women’s health
por: Khan, Khalid
Publicado: (2015)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_ch4tacr95comhglrsp12flvqih