Cargando…

Conceptualization of category-oriented likelihood ratio: a useful tool for clinical diagnostic reasoning

BACKGROUND: In the diagnostic reasoning process medical students and novice physicians need to be made aware of the diagnostic values of the clinical findings (including history, signs, and symptoms) to make an appropriate diagnostic decision. Diagnostic reasoning has been understood in light of two...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moosapour, Hamideh, Raza, Mohsin, Rambod, Mehdi, Soltani, Akbar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3341573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22094044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-11-94
_version_ 1782231560451260416
author Moosapour, Hamideh
Raza, Mohsin
Rambod, Mehdi
Soltani, Akbar
author_facet Moosapour, Hamideh
Raza, Mohsin
Rambod, Mehdi
Soltani, Akbar
author_sort Moosapour, Hamideh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the diagnostic reasoning process medical students and novice physicians need to be made aware of the diagnostic values of the clinical findings (including history, signs, and symptoms) to make an appropriate diagnostic decision. Diagnostic reasoning has been understood in light of two paradigms on clinical reasoning: problem solving and decision making. They advocate the reasoning strategies used by expert physicians and the statistical models of reasoning, respectively. Evidence-based medicine (EBM) applies decision theory to the clinical diagnosis, which can be a challenging topic in medical education. This theoretical article tries to compare evidence-based diagnosis with expert-based strategies in clinical diagnosis and also defines a novel concept of category-oriented likelihood ratio (LR) to propose a new model combining both aforementioned methods. DISCUSSION: Evidence-based medicine advocates the use of quantitative evidence to estimate the probability of diseases more accurately and objectively; however, the published evidence for a given diagnosis cannot practically be utilized in primary care, especially if the patient is complaining of a nonspecific problem such as abdominal pain that could have a long list of differential diagnoses. In this case, expert physicians examine the key clinical findings that could differentiate between broader categories of diseases such as organic and non-organic disease categories to shorten the list of differential diagnoses. To approach nonspecific problems, not only do the experts revise the probability estimate of specific diseases, but also they revise the probability estimate of the categories of diseases by using the available clinical findings. SUMMARY: To make this approach analytical and objective, we need to know how much more likely it is for a key clinical finding to be present in patients with one of the diseases of a specific category versus those with a disease not included in that category. In this paper, we call this value category-oriented LR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3341573
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33415732012-05-02 Conceptualization of category-oriented likelihood ratio: a useful tool for clinical diagnostic reasoning Moosapour, Hamideh Raza, Mohsin Rambod, Mehdi Soltani, Akbar BMC Med Educ Debate BACKGROUND: In the diagnostic reasoning process medical students and novice physicians need to be made aware of the diagnostic values of the clinical findings (including history, signs, and symptoms) to make an appropriate diagnostic decision. Diagnostic reasoning has been understood in light of two paradigms on clinical reasoning: problem solving and decision making. They advocate the reasoning strategies used by expert physicians and the statistical models of reasoning, respectively. Evidence-based medicine (EBM) applies decision theory to the clinical diagnosis, which can be a challenging topic in medical education. This theoretical article tries to compare evidence-based diagnosis with expert-based strategies in clinical diagnosis and also defines a novel concept of category-oriented likelihood ratio (LR) to propose a new model combining both aforementioned methods. DISCUSSION: Evidence-based medicine advocates the use of quantitative evidence to estimate the probability of diseases more accurately and objectively; however, the published evidence for a given diagnosis cannot practically be utilized in primary care, especially if the patient is complaining of a nonspecific problem such as abdominal pain that could have a long list of differential diagnoses. In this case, expert physicians examine the key clinical findings that could differentiate between broader categories of diseases such as organic and non-organic disease categories to shorten the list of differential diagnoses. To approach nonspecific problems, not only do the experts revise the probability estimate of specific diseases, but also they revise the probability estimate of the categories of diseases by using the available clinical findings. SUMMARY: To make this approach analytical and objective, we need to know how much more likely it is for a key clinical finding to be present in patients with one of the diseases of a specific category versus those with a disease not included in that category. In this paper, we call this value category-oriented LR. BioMed Central 2011-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3341573/ /pubmed/22094044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-11-94 Text en Copyright ©2011 Moosapour et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Debate
Moosapour, Hamideh
Raza, Mohsin
Rambod, Mehdi
Soltani, Akbar
Conceptualization of category-oriented likelihood ratio: a useful tool for clinical diagnostic reasoning
title Conceptualization of category-oriented likelihood ratio: a useful tool for clinical diagnostic reasoning
title_full Conceptualization of category-oriented likelihood ratio: a useful tool for clinical diagnostic reasoning
title_fullStr Conceptualization of category-oriented likelihood ratio: a useful tool for clinical diagnostic reasoning
title_full_unstemmed Conceptualization of category-oriented likelihood ratio: a useful tool for clinical diagnostic reasoning
title_short Conceptualization of category-oriented likelihood ratio: a useful tool for clinical diagnostic reasoning
title_sort conceptualization of category-oriented likelihood ratio: a useful tool for clinical diagnostic reasoning
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3341573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22094044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-11-94
work_keys_str_mv AT moosapourhamideh conceptualizationofcategoryorientedlikelihoodratioausefultoolforclinicaldiagnosticreasoning
AT razamohsin conceptualizationofcategoryorientedlikelihoodratioausefultoolforclinicaldiagnosticreasoning
AT rambodmehdi conceptualizationofcategoryorientedlikelihoodratioausefultoolforclinicaldiagnosticreasoning
AT soltaniakbar conceptualizationofcategoryorientedlikelihoodratioausefultoolforclinicaldiagnosticreasoning