Cargando…

Clustering of classical swine fever virus isolates by codon pair bias

BACKGROUND: The genetic code consists of non-random usage of synonymous codons for the same amino acids, termed codon bias or codon usage. Codon juxtaposition is also non-random, referred to as codon context bias or codon pair bias. The codon and codon pair bias vary among different organisms, as we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leifer, Immanuel, Hoeper, Dirk, Blome, Sandra, Beer, Martin, Ruggli, Nicolas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3341591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22126254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-521
_version_ 1782231563914706944
author Leifer, Immanuel
Hoeper, Dirk
Blome, Sandra
Beer, Martin
Ruggli, Nicolas
author_facet Leifer, Immanuel
Hoeper, Dirk
Blome, Sandra
Beer, Martin
Ruggli, Nicolas
author_sort Leifer, Immanuel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The genetic code consists of non-random usage of synonymous codons for the same amino acids, termed codon bias or codon usage. Codon juxtaposition is also non-random, referred to as codon context bias or codon pair bias. The codon and codon pair bias vary among different organisms, as well as with viruses. Reasons for these differences are not completely understood. For classical swine fever virus (CSFV), it was suggested that the synonymous codon usage does not significantly influence virulence, but the relationship between variations in codon pair usage and CSFV virulence is unknown. Virulence can be related to the fitness of a virus: Differences in codon pair usage influence genome translation efficiency, which may in turn relate to the fitness of a virus. Accordingly, the potential of the codon pair bias for clustering CSFV isolates into classes of different virulence was investigated. RESULTS: The complete genomic sequences encoding the viral polyprotein of 52 different CSFV isolates were analyzed. This included 49 sequences from the GenBank database (NCBI) and three newly sequenced genomes. The codon usage did not differ among isolates of different virulence or genotype. In contrast, a clustering of isolates based on their codon pair bias was observed, clearly discriminating highly virulent isolates and vaccine strains on one side from moderately virulent strains on the other side. However, phylogenetic trees based on the codon pair bias and on the primary nucleotide sequence resulted in a very similar genotype distribution. CONCLUSION: Clustering of CSFV genomes based on their codon pair bias correlate with the genotype rather than with the virulence of the isolates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3341591
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33415912012-05-02 Clustering of classical swine fever virus isolates by codon pair bias Leifer, Immanuel Hoeper, Dirk Blome, Sandra Beer, Martin Ruggli, Nicolas BMC Res Notes Research Article BACKGROUND: The genetic code consists of non-random usage of synonymous codons for the same amino acids, termed codon bias or codon usage. Codon juxtaposition is also non-random, referred to as codon context bias or codon pair bias. The codon and codon pair bias vary among different organisms, as well as with viruses. Reasons for these differences are not completely understood. For classical swine fever virus (CSFV), it was suggested that the synonymous codon usage does not significantly influence virulence, but the relationship between variations in codon pair usage and CSFV virulence is unknown. Virulence can be related to the fitness of a virus: Differences in codon pair usage influence genome translation efficiency, which may in turn relate to the fitness of a virus. Accordingly, the potential of the codon pair bias for clustering CSFV isolates into classes of different virulence was investigated. RESULTS: The complete genomic sequences encoding the viral polyprotein of 52 different CSFV isolates were analyzed. This included 49 sequences from the GenBank database (NCBI) and three newly sequenced genomes. The codon usage did not differ among isolates of different virulence or genotype. In contrast, a clustering of isolates based on their codon pair bias was observed, clearly discriminating highly virulent isolates and vaccine strains on one side from moderately virulent strains on the other side. However, phylogenetic trees based on the codon pair bias and on the primary nucleotide sequence resulted in a very similar genotype distribution. CONCLUSION: Clustering of CSFV genomes based on their codon pair bias correlate with the genotype rather than with the virulence of the isolates. BioMed Central 2011-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3341591/ /pubmed/22126254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-521 Text en Copyright ©2011 Leifer et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Leifer, Immanuel
Hoeper, Dirk
Blome, Sandra
Beer, Martin
Ruggli, Nicolas
Clustering of classical swine fever virus isolates by codon pair bias
title Clustering of classical swine fever virus isolates by codon pair bias
title_full Clustering of classical swine fever virus isolates by codon pair bias
title_fullStr Clustering of classical swine fever virus isolates by codon pair bias
title_full_unstemmed Clustering of classical swine fever virus isolates by codon pair bias
title_short Clustering of classical swine fever virus isolates by codon pair bias
title_sort clustering of classical swine fever virus isolates by codon pair bias
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3341591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22126254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-521
work_keys_str_mv AT leiferimmanuel clusteringofclassicalswinefevervirusisolatesbycodonpairbias
AT hoeperdirk clusteringofclassicalswinefevervirusisolatesbycodonpairbias
AT blomesandra clusteringofclassicalswinefevervirusisolatesbycodonpairbias
AT beermartin clusteringofclassicalswinefevervirusisolatesbycodonpairbias
AT rugglinicolas clusteringofclassicalswinefevervirusisolatesbycodonpairbias