Cargando…
Consciousness regained? Philosophical arguments for and against reductive physicalism
This paper is an overview of recent discussions concerning the mind-body problem, which is being addressed at the interface between philosophy and neuroscience. It focuses on phenomenal features of consciousness or “qualia,” which are distinguished from various related issues. Then follows a discuss...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Les Laboratoires Servier
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3341650/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22577305 |
_version_ | 1782231571355402240 |
---|---|
author | Sturm, Thomas |
author_facet | Sturm, Thomas |
author_sort | Sturm, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper is an overview of recent discussions concerning the mind-body problem, which is being addressed at the interface between philosophy and neuroscience. It focuses on phenomenal features of consciousness or “qualia,” which are distinguished from various related issues. Then follows a discussion of various influential skeptical arguments that question the possibility of reductive explanations of qualia in physicalist terms: knowledge arguments, conceivability arguments, the argument of multiple realizability, and the explanatory gap argument. None of the arguments is found to be very convincing. It does not necessarily follow that reductive physicalism is the only option, but it is defensible. However, constant conceptual and methodological reflection is required, alongside ongoing research, to keep such a view free from dogmatism and naivety. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3341650 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Les Laboratoires Servier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33416502012-05-10 Consciousness regained? Philosophical arguments for and against reductive physicalism Sturm, Thomas Dialogues Clin Neurosci Basic Research This paper is an overview of recent discussions concerning the mind-body problem, which is being addressed at the interface between philosophy and neuroscience. It focuses on phenomenal features of consciousness or “qualia,” which are distinguished from various related issues. Then follows a discussion of various influential skeptical arguments that question the possibility of reductive explanations of qualia in physicalist terms: knowledge arguments, conceivability arguments, the argument of multiple realizability, and the explanatory gap argument. None of the arguments is found to be very convincing. It does not necessarily follow that reductive physicalism is the only option, but it is defensible. However, constant conceptual and methodological reflection is required, alongside ongoing research, to keep such a view free from dogmatism and naivety. Les Laboratoires Servier 2012-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3341650/ /pubmed/22577305 Text en Copyright: © 2012 LLS http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Basic Research Sturm, Thomas Consciousness regained? Philosophical arguments for and against reductive physicalism |
title | Consciousness regained? Philosophical arguments for and against reductive physicalism |
title_full | Consciousness regained? Philosophical arguments for and against reductive physicalism |
title_fullStr | Consciousness regained? Philosophical arguments for and against reductive physicalism |
title_full_unstemmed | Consciousness regained? Philosophical arguments for and against reductive physicalism |
title_short | Consciousness regained? Philosophical arguments for and against reductive physicalism |
title_sort | consciousness regained? philosophical arguments for and against reductive physicalism |
topic | Basic Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3341650/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22577305 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sturmthomas consciousnessregainedphilosophicalargumentsforandagainstreductivephysicalism |