Cargando…

Consciousness regained? Philosophical arguments for and against reductive physicalism

This paper is an overview of recent discussions concerning the mind-body problem, which is being addressed at the interface between philosophy and neuroscience. It focuses on phenomenal features of consciousness or “qualia,” which are distinguished from various related issues. Then follows a discuss...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Sturm, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Les Laboratoires Servier 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3341650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22577305
_version_ 1782231571355402240
author Sturm, Thomas
author_facet Sturm, Thomas
author_sort Sturm, Thomas
collection PubMed
description This paper is an overview of recent discussions concerning the mind-body problem, which is being addressed at the interface between philosophy and neuroscience. It focuses on phenomenal features of consciousness or “qualia,” which are distinguished from various related issues. Then follows a discussion of various influential skeptical arguments that question the possibility of reductive explanations of qualia in physicalist terms: knowledge arguments, conceivability arguments, the argument of multiple realizability, and the explanatory gap argument. None of the arguments is found to be very convincing. It does not necessarily follow that reductive physicalism is the only option, but it is defensible. However, constant conceptual and methodological reflection is required, alongside ongoing research, to keep such a view free from dogmatism and naivety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3341650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Les Laboratoires Servier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33416502012-05-10 Consciousness regained? Philosophical arguments for and against reductive physicalism Sturm, Thomas Dialogues Clin Neurosci Basic Research This paper is an overview of recent discussions concerning the mind-body problem, which is being addressed at the interface between philosophy and neuroscience. It focuses on phenomenal features of consciousness or “qualia,” which are distinguished from various related issues. Then follows a discussion of various influential skeptical arguments that question the possibility of reductive explanations of qualia in physicalist terms: knowledge arguments, conceivability arguments, the argument of multiple realizability, and the explanatory gap argument. None of the arguments is found to be very convincing. It does not necessarily follow that reductive physicalism is the only option, but it is defensible. However, constant conceptual and methodological reflection is required, alongside ongoing research, to keep such a view free from dogmatism and naivety. Les Laboratoires Servier 2012-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3341650/ /pubmed/22577305 Text en Copyright: © 2012 LLS http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Basic Research
Sturm, Thomas
Consciousness regained? Philosophical arguments for and against reductive physicalism
title Consciousness regained? Philosophical arguments for and against reductive physicalism
title_full Consciousness regained? Philosophical arguments for and against reductive physicalism
title_fullStr Consciousness regained? Philosophical arguments for and against reductive physicalism
title_full_unstemmed Consciousness regained? Philosophical arguments for and against reductive physicalism
title_short Consciousness regained? Philosophical arguments for and against reductive physicalism
title_sort consciousness regained? philosophical arguments for and against reductive physicalism
topic Basic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3341650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22577305
work_keys_str_mv AT sturmthomas consciousnessregainedphilosophicalargumentsforandagainstreductivephysicalism