Cargando…

Comparison of shear bond strength of aesthetic restorative materials

AIM: The present study was conducted to determine and compare the shear bond strengths of Conventional glass ionomer; Resin-modified glass ionomer; Polyacid-modified composite and Composite Resin, and to assess and determine the mode of failure (adhesive, cohesive, mixed). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Occ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nujella, B. P. Suryakumari, Choudary, Manisha T., Reddy, Satyanarayana P., Kumar, M. Kiran, Gopal, T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3341754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22557892
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.94541
_version_ 1782231581152247808
author Nujella, B. P. Suryakumari
Choudary, Manisha T.
Reddy, Satyanarayana P.
Kumar, M. Kiran
Gopal, T.
author_facet Nujella, B. P. Suryakumari
Choudary, Manisha T.
Reddy, Satyanarayana P.
Kumar, M. Kiran
Gopal, T.
author_sort Nujella, B. P. Suryakumari
collection PubMed
description AIM: The present study was conducted to determine and compare the shear bond strengths of Conventional glass ionomer; Resin-modified glass ionomer; Polyacid-modified composite and Composite Resin, and to assess and determine the mode of failure (adhesive, cohesive, mixed). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Occlusal dentin of 40 extracted human teeth were randomly divided into four groups of ten teeth, each based on the restorative materials tested as follows: Group I: Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement (Control); Group II: Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement; Group III: Polyacid-modified Composite Resin; Group IV: Hybrid Composite Resin. The bonded materials were subjected to shear bond strength (SBS) testing in a Instron Universal Testing Machine (UTM) at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The bond failure location was examined by the use of a stereomicroscope at 10× magnification. The mean SBS of Groups I–IV obtained was 3.81, 9.71, 11.96 and 18.16 MPa, respectively. Comparison of mean shear bond strengths of all groups was done by one way ANOVA test and comparison of means in between groups by the Student's t test. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that the compomer restorative materials show higher shear bond strength than conventional glass-ionomer and resin-modified glass-ionomer, but less than composite resin.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3341754
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33417542012-05-03 Comparison of shear bond strength of aesthetic restorative materials Nujella, B. P. Suryakumari Choudary, Manisha T. Reddy, Satyanarayana P. Kumar, M. Kiran Gopal, T. Contemp Clin Dent Original Article AIM: The present study was conducted to determine and compare the shear bond strengths of Conventional glass ionomer; Resin-modified glass ionomer; Polyacid-modified composite and Composite Resin, and to assess and determine the mode of failure (adhesive, cohesive, mixed). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Occlusal dentin of 40 extracted human teeth were randomly divided into four groups of ten teeth, each based on the restorative materials tested as follows: Group I: Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement (Control); Group II: Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement; Group III: Polyacid-modified Composite Resin; Group IV: Hybrid Composite Resin. The bonded materials were subjected to shear bond strength (SBS) testing in a Instron Universal Testing Machine (UTM) at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The bond failure location was examined by the use of a stereomicroscope at 10× magnification. The mean SBS of Groups I–IV obtained was 3.81, 9.71, 11.96 and 18.16 MPa, respectively. Comparison of mean shear bond strengths of all groups was done by one way ANOVA test and comparison of means in between groups by the Student's t test. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that the compomer restorative materials show higher shear bond strength than conventional glass-ionomer and resin-modified glass-ionomer, but less than composite resin. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3341754/ /pubmed/22557892 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.94541 Text en Copyright: © Contemporary Clinical Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Nujella, B. P. Suryakumari
Choudary, Manisha T.
Reddy, Satyanarayana P.
Kumar, M. Kiran
Gopal, T.
Comparison of shear bond strength of aesthetic restorative materials
title Comparison of shear bond strength of aesthetic restorative materials
title_full Comparison of shear bond strength of aesthetic restorative materials
title_fullStr Comparison of shear bond strength of aesthetic restorative materials
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of shear bond strength of aesthetic restorative materials
title_short Comparison of shear bond strength of aesthetic restorative materials
title_sort comparison of shear bond strength of aesthetic restorative materials
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3341754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22557892
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.94541
work_keys_str_mv AT nujellabpsuryakumari comparisonofshearbondstrengthofaestheticrestorativematerials
AT choudarymanishat comparisonofshearbondstrengthofaestheticrestorativematerials
AT reddysatyanarayanap comparisonofshearbondstrengthofaestheticrestorativematerials
AT kumarmkiran comparisonofshearbondstrengthofaestheticrestorativematerials
AT gopalt comparisonofshearbondstrengthofaestheticrestorativematerials