Cargando…

A content validated questionnaire for assessment of self reported venous blood sampling practices

BACKGROUND: Venous blood sampling is a common procedure in health care. It is strictly regulated by national and international guidelines. Deviations from guidelines due to human mistakes can cause patient harm. Validated questionnaires for health care personnel can be used to assess preventable &qu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bölenius, Karin, Brulin, Christine, Grankvist, Kjell, Lindkvist, Marie, Söderberg, Johan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3342148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22260505
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-39
_version_ 1782231641163300864
author Bölenius, Karin
Brulin, Christine
Grankvist, Kjell
Lindkvist, Marie
Söderberg, Johan
author_facet Bölenius, Karin
Brulin, Christine
Grankvist, Kjell
Lindkvist, Marie
Söderberg, Johan
author_sort Bölenius, Karin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Venous blood sampling is a common procedure in health care. It is strictly regulated by national and international guidelines. Deviations from guidelines due to human mistakes can cause patient harm. Validated questionnaires for health care personnel can be used to assess preventable "near misses"--i.e. potential errors and nonconformities during venous blood sampling practices that could transform into adverse events. However, no validated questionnaire that assesses nonconformities in venous blood sampling has previously been presented. The aim was to test a recently developed questionnaire in self reported venous blood sampling practices for validity and reliability. FINDINGS: We developed a questionnaire to assess deviations from best practices during venous blood sampling. The questionnaire contained questions about patient identification, test request management, test tube labeling, test tube handling, information search procedures and frequencies of error reporting. For content validity, the questionnaire was confirmed by experts on questionnaires and venous blood sampling. For reliability, test-retest statistics were used on the questionnaire answered twice. The final venous blood sampling questionnaire included 19 questions out of which 9 had in total 34 underlying items. It was found to have content validity. The test-retest analysis demonstrated that the items were generally stable. In total, 82% of the items fulfilled the reliability acceptance criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The questionnaire could be used for assessment of "near miss" practices that could jeopardize patient safety and gives several benefits instead of assessing rare adverse events only. The higher frequencies of "near miss" practices allows for quantitative analysis of the effect of corrective interventions and to benchmark preanalytical quality not only at the laboratory/hospital level but also at the health care unit/hospital ward.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3342148
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33421482012-05-03 A content validated questionnaire for assessment of self reported venous blood sampling practices Bölenius, Karin Brulin, Christine Grankvist, Kjell Lindkvist, Marie Söderberg, Johan BMC Res Notes Technical Note BACKGROUND: Venous blood sampling is a common procedure in health care. It is strictly regulated by national and international guidelines. Deviations from guidelines due to human mistakes can cause patient harm. Validated questionnaires for health care personnel can be used to assess preventable "near misses"--i.e. potential errors and nonconformities during venous blood sampling practices that could transform into adverse events. However, no validated questionnaire that assesses nonconformities in venous blood sampling has previously been presented. The aim was to test a recently developed questionnaire in self reported venous blood sampling practices for validity and reliability. FINDINGS: We developed a questionnaire to assess deviations from best practices during venous blood sampling. The questionnaire contained questions about patient identification, test request management, test tube labeling, test tube handling, information search procedures and frequencies of error reporting. For content validity, the questionnaire was confirmed by experts on questionnaires and venous blood sampling. For reliability, test-retest statistics were used on the questionnaire answered twice. The final venous blood sampling questionnaire included 19 questions out of which 9 had in total 34 underlying items. It was found to have content validity. The test-retest analysis demonstrated that the items were generally stable. In total, 82% of the items fulfilled the reliability acceptance criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The questionnaire could be used for assessment of "near miss" practices that could jeopardize patient safety and gives several benefits instead of assessing rare adverse events only. The higher frequencies of "near miss" practices allows for quantitative analysis of the effect of corrective interventions and to benchmark preanalytical quality not only at the laboratory/hospital level but also at the health care unit/hospital ward. BioMed Central 2012-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3342148/ /pubmed/22260505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-39 Text en Copyright ©2011 Bölenius et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Note
Bölenius, Karin
Brulin, Christine
Grankvist, Kjell
Lindkvist, Marie
Söderberg, Johan
A content validated questionnaire for assessment of self reported venous blood sampling practices
title A content validated questionnaire for assessment of self reported venous blood sampling practices
title_full A content validated questionnaire for assessment of self reported venous blood sampling practices
title_fullStr A content validated questionnaire for assessment of self reported venous blood sampling practices
title_full_unstemmed A content validated questionnaire for assessment of self reported venous blood sampling practices
title_short A content validated questionnaire for assessment of self reported venous blood sampling practices
title_sort content validated questionnaire for assessment of self reported venous blood sampling practices
topic Technical Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3342148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22260505
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-39
work_keys_str_mv AT boleniuskarin acontentvalidatedquestionnaireforassessmentofselfreportedvenousbloodsamplingpractices
AT brulinchristine acontentvalidatedquestionnaireforassessmentofselfreportedvenousbloodsamplingpractices
AT grankvistkjell acontentvalidatedquestionnaireforassessmentofselfreportedvenousbloodsamplingpractices
AT lindkvistmarie acontentvalidatedquestionnaireforassessmentofselfreportedvenousbloodsamplingpractices
AT soderbergjohan acontentvalidatedquestionnaireforassessmentofselfreportedvenousbloodsamplingpractices
AT boleniuskarin contentvalidatedquestionnaireforassessmentofselfreportedvenousbloodsamplingpractices
AT brulinchristine contentvalidatedquestionnaireforassessmentofselfreportedvenousbloodsamplingpractices
AT grankvistkjell contentvalidatedquestionnaireforassessmentofselfreportedvenousbloodsamplingpractices
AT lindkvistmarie contentvalidatedquestionnaireforassessmentofselfreportedvenousbloodsamplingpractices
AT soderbergjohan contentvalidatedquestionnaireforassessmentofselfreportedvenousbloodsamplingpractices