Cargando…

Initiative, Personality and Leadership in Pairs of Foraging Fish

Studies of coordinated movement have found that, in many animal species, bolder individuals are more likely to initiate movement and shyer individuals to follow. Here, we show that in pairs of foraging stickleback fish, leadership is not merely a passive consequence of temperamental differences. Ins...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakayama, Shinnosuke, Harcourt, Jennifer L., Johnstone, Rufus A., Manica, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3342251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22567168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036606
_version_ 1782231664837001216
author Nakayama, Shinnosuke
Harcourt, Jennifer L.
Johnstone, Rufus A.
Manica, Andrea
author_facet Nakayama, Shinnosuke
Harcourt, Jennifer L.
Johnstone, Rufus A.
Manica, Andrea
author_sort Nakayama, Shinnosuke
collection PubMed
description Studies of coordinated movement have found that, in many animal species, bolder individuals are more likely to initiate movement and shyer individuals to follow. Here, we show that in pairs of foraging stickleback fish, leadership is not merely a passive consequence of temperamental differences. Instead, the act of initiating a joint foraging trip out of cover itself brings about a change in the role that an individual plays throughout the subsequent trip, and success in recruiting a partner affects an individual's tendency to initiate the next trip. On each joint trip, whichever fish took the initiative in leading out of cover gains greater influence over its partner's behaviour, which persists even after several changes in position (i.e. termination attempts and re-joining). During any given trip, the initiator is less responsive to its partner's movements than during trips initiated by the partner. An individual's personality had an important effect on its response to failure to recruit a partner: while bold fish were unaffected by failures to initiate a joint trip, shy individuals were less likely to attempt another initiation after a failure. This difference provides a positive feedback mechanism that can partially stabilise social roles within the pair, but it is not strong enough to prevent occasional swaps, with individuals dynamically adjusting their responses to one another as they exchange roles.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3342251
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33422512012-05-07 Initiative, Personality and Leadership in Pairs of Foraging Fish Nakayama, Shinnosuke Harcourt, Jennifer L. Johnstone, Rufus A. Manica, Andrea PLoS One Research Article Studies of coordinated movement have found that, in many animal species, bolder individuals are more likely to initiate movement and shyer individuals to follow. Here, we show that in pairs of foraging stickleback fish, leadership is not merely a passive consequence of temperamental differences. Instead, the act of initiating a joint foraging trip out of cover itself brings about a change in the role that an individual plays throughout the subsequent trip, and success in recruiting a partner affects an individual's tendency to initiate the next trip. On each joint trip, whichever fish took the initiative in leading out of cover gains greater influence over its partner's behaviour, which persists even after several changes in position (i.e. termination attempts and re-joining). During any given trip, the initiator is less responsive to its partner's movements than during trips initiated by the partner. An individual's personality had an important effect on its response to failure to recruit a partner: while bold fish were unaffected by failures to initiate a joint trip, shy individuals were less likely to attempt another initiation after a failure. This difference provides a positive feedback mechanism that can partially stabilise social roles within the pair, but it is not strong enough to prevent occasional swaps, with individuals dynamically adjusting their responses to one another as they exchange roles. Public Library of Science 2012-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3342251/ /pubmed/22567168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036606 Text en Nakayama et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nakayama, Shinnosuke
Harcourt, Jennifer L.
Johnstone, Rufus A.
Manica, Andrea
Initiative, Personality and Leadership in Pairs of Foraging Fish
title Initiative, Personality and Leadership in Pairs of Foraging Fish
title_full Initiative, Personality and Leadership in Pairs of Foraging Fish
title_fullStr Initiative, Personality and Leadership in Pairs of Foraging Fish
title_full_unstemmed Initiative, Personality and Leadership in Pairs of Foraging Fish
title_short Initiative, Personality and Leadership in Pairs of Foraging Fish
title_sort initiative, personality and leadership in pairs of foraging fish
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3342251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22567168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036606
work_keys_str_mv AT nakayamashinnosuke initiativepersonalityandleadershipinpairsofforagingfish
AT harcourtjenniferl initiativepersonalityandleadershipinpairsofforagingfish
AT johnstonerufusa initiativepersonalityandleadershipinpairsofforagingfish
AT manicaandrea initiativepersonalityandleadershipinpairsofforagingfish