Cargando…

Addition of gemcitabine to standard therapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: A randomized comparative study

BACKGROUND: The concurrent chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer treatment is well accepted since 1999. This randomized, phase III trial aimed to observe if any improved outcome could be obtained capitalizing on the synergistic activity of gemcitabine, cisplatin, XRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Stage II...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roy, Sanjoy, Devleena, Maji, Tapas, Chaudhuri, Prabir, Lahiri, Debarshi, Biswas, Jaydip
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3342718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22557778
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-5851.92809
_version_ 1782231721210544128
author Roy, Sanjoy
Devleena,
Maji, Tapas
Chaudhuri, Prabir
Lahiri, Debarshi
Biswas, Jaydip
author_facet Roy, Sanjoy
Devleena,
Maji, Tapas
Chaudhuri, Prabir
Lahiri, Debarshi
Biswas, Jaydip
author_sort Roy, Sanjoy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The concurrent chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer treatment is well accepted since 1999. This randomized, phase III trial aimed to observe if any improved outcome could be obtained capitalizing on the synergistic activity of gemcitabine, cisplatin, XRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Stage IIB-IIIB, 18-70 years of age, KPS score ≥70, were randomized to control group and study group. Control group received cisplatin 40 mg/m(2) weekly with concurrent XRT, followed by brachytherapy and study group received gemcitabine 125 mg/m(2) weekly top of the same control group treatment. The primary end point was pathological response and toxicities along with patient compliance to treatment, late reactions, DFS and OS. Fifty patients were randomized between two arms. RESULTS: The complete response in study and control arm was 96% and 88% respectively. Toxicities was significantly high in the study group compared to control group [leucopenia (P=0.015), skin reaction (P=0.03) and bleeding (P=0.019)]. Local recurrence rate: 8% in study arm, none in control arm. The distant failure prevailed in control arm (20% vs. 8%). On a median follow up of 21 months in control arm, the DFS was 73% whereas 83% in study arm in 16 months (P=0.69). OS in the study arm was 100% and 84.5% in the control arm (P=0.14). CONCLUSIONS: If the toxicity can be managed adequately in the combination chemo radiation group, it may produce an improvement in response. Survival benefit can also be obtained by introducing gemcitabine to cisplatin as radio sensitizer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3342718
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33427182012-05-03 Addition of gemcitabine to standard therapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: A randomized comparative study Roy, Sanjoy Devleena, Maji, Tapas Chaudhuri, Prabir Lahiri, Debarshi Biswas, Jaydip Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol Original Article BACKGROUND: The concurrent chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer treatment is well accepted since 1999. This randomized, phase III trial aimed to observe if any improved outcome could be obtained capitalizing on the synergistic activity of gemcitabine, cisplatin, XRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Stage IIB-IIIB, 18-70 years of age, KPS score ≥70, were randomized to control group and study group. Control group received cisplatin 40 mg/m(2) weekly with concurrent XRT, followed by brachytherapy and study group received gemcitabine 125 mg/m(2) weekly top of the same control group treatment. The primary end point was pathological response and toxicities along with patient compliance to treatment, late reactions, DFS and OS. Fifty patients were randomized between two arms. RESULTS: The complete response in study and control arm was 96% and 88% respectively. Toxicities was significantly high in the study group compared to control group [leucopenia (P=0.015), skin reaction (P=0.03) and bleeding (P=0.019)]. Local recurrence rate: 8% in study arm, none in control arm. The distant failure prevailed in control arm (20% vs. 8%). On a median follow up of 21 months in control arm, the DFS was 73% whereas 83% in study arm in 16 months (P=0.69). OS in the study arm was 100% and 84.5% in the control arm (P=0.14). CONCLUSIONS: If the toxicity can be managed adequately in the combination chemo radiation group, it may produce an improvement in response. Survival benefit can also be obtained by introducing gemcitabine to cisplatin as radio sensitizer. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3342718/ /pubmed/22557778 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-5851.92809 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Roy, Sanjoy
Devleena,
Maji, Tapas
Chaudhuri, Prabir
Lahiri, Debarshi
Biswas, Jaydip
Addition of gemcitabine to standard therapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: A randomized comparative study
title Addition of gemcitabine to standard therapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: A randomized comparative study
title_full Addition of gemcitabine to standard therapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: A randomized comparative study
title_fullStr Addition of gemcitabine to standard therapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: A randomized comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Addition of gemcitabine to standard therapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: A randomized comparative study
title_short Addition of gemcitabine to standard therapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: A randomized comparative study
title_sort addition of gemcitabine to standard therapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a randomized comparative study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3342718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22557778
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-5851.92809
work_keys_str_mv AT roysanjoy additionofgemcitabinetostandardtherapyinlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerarandomizedcomparativestudy
AT devleena additionofgemcitabinetostandardtherapyinlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerarandomizedcomparativestudy
AT majitapas additionofgemcitabinetostandardtherapyinlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerarandomizedcomparativestudy
AT chaudhuriprabir additionofgemcitabinetostandardtherapyinlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerarandomizedcomparativestudy
AT lahiridebarshi additionofgemcitabinetostandardtherapyinlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerarandomizedcomparativestudy
AT biswasjaydip additionofgemcitabinetostandardtherapyinlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerarandomizedcomparativestudy