Cargando…

Dual-Energy X-Ray Performs as Well as Clinical Computed Tomography for the Measurement of Visceral Fat

Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) is associated with adverse health effects including cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. We developed a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurement of visceral adipose tissue (DXA-VAT) as a low cost and low radiation alternative to computed tomography (CT)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Micklesfield, Lisa K., Goedecke, Julia H., Punyanitya, Mark, Wilson, Kevin E., Kelly, Thomas L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3343346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22240726
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/oby.2011.367
_version_ 1782231808458358784
author Micklesfield, Lisa K.
Goedecke, Julia H.
Punyanitya, Mark
Wilson, Kevin E.
Kelly, Thomas L.
author_facet Micklesfield, Lisa K.
Goedecke, Julia H.
Punyanitya, Mark
Wilson, Kevin E.
Kelly, Thomas L.
author_sort Micklesfield, Lisa K.
collection PubMed
description Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) is associated with adverse health effects including cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. We developed a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurement of visceral adipose tissue (DXA-VAT) as a low cost and low radiation alternative to computed tomography (CT). DXA-VAT was compared to VAT assessed using CT by an expert reader (E-VAT). In addition, the same CT slice was also read by a clinical radiographer (C-VAT) and a best-fit anthropomorphic and demographic VAT model (A-VAT) was developed. Whole body DXA, CT at L4–L5, and anthropometry were measured on 272 black and white South African women (age 29 ± 8 years, BMI 28 ± 7 kg/m(2), waist circumference (WC) 89 ± 16 cm). Approximately one-half of the dataset (n = 141) was randomly selected and used as a training set for the development of DXA-VAT and A-VAT, which were then used to estimate VAT on the remaining 131 women in a blinded fashion. DXA-VAT (r = 0.93, standard error of the estimate (SEE) = 16 cm(2)) and C-VAT (r = 0.93, SEE = 16 cm(2)) were strongly correlated to E-VAT. These correlations with E-VAT were significantly stronger (P < 0.001) than the correlations of individual anthropometry measurements and the A-VAT model (WC + age, r = 0.79, SEE = 27 cm(2)). The inclusion of anthropometric and demographic measurements did not substantially improve the correlation between DXA-VAT and E-VAT. DXA-VAT performed as well as a clinical read of VAT from a CT scan and better than anthropomorphic and demographic models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3343346
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33433462012-05-04 Dual-Energy X-Ray Performs as Well as Clinical Computed Tomography for the Measurement of Visceral Fat Micklesfield, Lisa K. Goedecke, Julia H. Punyanitya, Mark Wilson, Kevin E. Kelly, Thomas L. Obesity (Silver Spring) Methods and Techniques Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) is associated with adverse health effects including cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. We developed a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurement of visceral adipose tissue (DXA-VAT) as a low cost and low radiation alternative to computed tomography (CT). DXA-VAT was compared to VAT assessed using CT by an expert reader (E-VAT). In addition, the same CT slice was also read by a clinical radiographer (C-VAT) and a best-fit anthropomorphic and demographic VAT model (A-VAT) was developed. Whole body DXA, CT at L4–L5, and anthropometry were measured on 272 black and white South African women (age 29 ± 8 years, BMI 28 ± 7 kg/m(2), waist circumference (WC) 89 ± 16 cm). Approximately one-half of the dataset (n = 141) was randomly selected and used as a training set for the development of DXA-VAT and A-VAT, which were then used to estimate VAT on the remaining 131 women in a blinded fashion. DXA-VAT (r = 0.93, standard error of the estimate (SEE) = 16 cm(2)) and C-VAT (r = 0.93, SEE = 16 cm(2)) were strongly correlated to E-VAT. These correlations with E-VAT were significantly stronger (P < 0.001) than the correlations of individual anthropometry measurements and the A-VAT model (WC + age, r = 0.79, SEE = 27 cm(2)). The inclusion of anthropometric and demographic measurements did not substantially improve the correlation between DXA-VAT and E-VAT. DXA-VAT performed as well as a clinical read of VAT from a CT scan and better than anthropomorphic and demographic models. Nature Publishing Group 2012-05 2012-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3343346/ /pubmed/22240726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/oby.2011.367 Text en Copyright © 2012 The Obesity Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
spellingShingle Methods and Techniques
Micklesfield, Lisa K.
Goedecke, Julia H.
Punyanitya, Mark
Wilson, Kevin E.
Kelly, Thomas L.
Dual-Energy X-Ray Performs as Well as Clinical Computed Tomography for the Measurement of Visceral Fat
title Dual-Energy X-Ray Performs as Well as Clinical Computed Tomography for the Measurement of Visceral Fat
title_full Dual-Energy X-Ray Performs as Well as Clinical Computed Tomography for the Measurement of Visceral Fat
title_fullStr Dual-Energy X-Ray Performs as Well as Clinical Computed Tomography for the Measurement of Visceral Fat
title_full_unstemmed Dual-Energy X-Ray Performs as Well as Clinical Computed Tomography for the Measurement of Visceral Fat
title_short Dual-Energy X-Ray Performs as Well as Clinical Computed Tomography for the Measurement of Visceral Fat
title_sort dual-energy x-ray performs as well as clinical computed tomography for the measurement of visceral fat
topic Methods and Techniques
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3343346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22240726
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/oby.2011.367
work_keys_str_mv AT micklesfieldlisak dualenergyxrayperformsaswellasclinicalcomputedtomographyforthemeasurementofvisceralfat
AT goedeckejuliah dualenergyxrayperformsaswellasclinicalcomputedtomographyforthemeasurementofvisceralfat
AT punyanityamark dualenergyxrayperformsaswellasclinicalcomputedtomographyforthemeasurementofvisceralfat
AT wilsonkevine dualenergyxrayperformsaswellasclinicalcomputedtomographyforthemeasurementofvisceralfat
AT kellythomasl dualenergyxrayperformsaswellasclinicalcomputedtomographyforthemeasurementofvisceralfat