Cargando…

Empty Reviews: A Description and Consideration of Cochrane Systematic Reviews with No Included Studies

BACKGROUND: There is no specific guidance for the reporting of Cochrane systematic reviews that do not have studies eligible for inclusion. As a result, the reporting of these so-called “empty reviews” may vary across reviews. This research explores the incidence of empty systematic reviews in The C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Yaffe, Joanne, Montgomery, Paul, Hopewell, Sally, Shepard, Lindsay Dianne
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3344923/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22574201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036626

Ejemplares similares

Cochrane methods - twenty years experience in developing systematic review methods
por: Chandler, Jackie, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Are more observational studies being included in Cochrane Reviews?
por: Kongsted, Hans Christian, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

A descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
por: Bow, Simon, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Assessment of health equity consideration in Cochrane systematic reviews and primary studies on urolithiasis
por: Basirat, Reyhane, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Considerations from the risk of bias perspective for updating Cochrane reviews
por: Mayhew, Alain D., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Completeness of outcome description in studies for low back pain rehabilitation interventions: a survey of trials included in Cochrane reviews
por: Castellini, Greta, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Quality Assessment of Studies Included in Cochrane Oral Health Systematic Reviews: A Meta-Research
por: Sofi-Mahmudi, Ahmad, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The judgement of biases included in the category “other bias” in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: a systematic survey
por: Babic, Andrija, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Investing in updating: how do conclusions change when Cochrane systematic reviews are updated?
por: French, Simon D, et al.
Publicado: (2005)

A descriptive analysis of non-Cochrane child-relevant systematic reviews published in 2014
por: Gates, Michelle, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Impact of Including Korean Randomized Controlled Trials in Cochrane Reviews of Acupuncture
por: Kim, Kun Hyung, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Oral fumaric acid esters for psoriasis: abridged Cochrane systematic review including GRADE assessments
por: Atwan, A., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Maintaining relevance in HIV systematic reviews: an evaluation of Cochrane reviews
por: Eshun-Wilson, Ingrid, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Include or not to include conference abstracts in systematic reviews? Lessons learned from a large Cochrane network meta-analysis including 585 trials
por: Hackenbroich, Samantha, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Descriptive analysis of cochrane child-relevant systematic reviews: an update and comparison between 2009 and 2013
por: Crick, Katelynn, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Converting systematic reviews to Cochrane format: a cross-sectional survey of Australian authors of systematic reviews
por: Piehl, Janet H, et al.
Publicado: (2003)

Cochrane Eyes and Vision: systematic reviews on myopia
por: Evans, Jennifer
Publicado: (2019)

The quality of Cochrane systematic reviews of acupuncture: an overview
por: Ji, Zhaochen, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Statistical Multiplicity in Systematic Reviews of Anaesthesia Interventions: A Quantification and Comparison between Cochrane and Non-Cochrane Reviews
por: Imberger, Georgina, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration
por: Turner, Lucy, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Characteristics of meta-analyses and their component studies in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: a cross-sectional, descriptive analysis
por: Davey, Jonathan, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Assessing bias in osteoarthritis trials included in Cochrane reviews: protocol for a meta-epidemiological study
por: Hansen, Julie B, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Assessing the magnitude of changes from protocol to publication—a survey on Cochrane and non-Cochrane Systematic Reviews
por: Siebert, Maximilian, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Most Cochrane systematic reviews and protocols did not adhere to the Cochrane's risk of bias 2.0 tool
por: Martimbianco, Ana Luiza Cabrera, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Strengthening systematic reviews in public health: guidance in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, 2nd edition
por: Cumpston, Miranda S, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Cochrane Systematic Reviews of Chinese Herbal Medicines: An Overview
por: Hu, Jing, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Corticosteroids for sepsis: registry versus Cochrane systematic review!
por: Annane, Djillali
Publicado: (2010)

Ginseng for Erectile Dysfunction: A Cochrane Systematic Review
por: Lee, Hye Won, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Claims of ‘no difference’ or ‘no effect’ in Cochrane and other systematic reviews
por: Marson Smith, Phoebe Rose, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Reporting and methodologic quality of Cochrane Neonatal review group systematic reviews
por: Al Faleh, Khalid, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Do Cochrane summaries help student midwives understand the findings of Cochrane systematic reviews: the BRIEF randomised trial
por: Alderdice, Fiona, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Risk of bias judgments for random sequence generation in Cochrane systematic reviews were frequently not in line with Cochrane Handbook
por: Barcot, Ognjen, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Consideration of sex and gender in Cochrane reviews of interventions for preventing healthcare-associated infections: a methodology study
por: López-Alcalde, Jesús, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Producing Cochrane systematic reviews—a qualitative study of current approaches and opportunities for innovation and improvement
por: Turner, Tari, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Reporting of methods to prepare, pilot and perform data extraction in systematic reviews: analysis of a sample of 152 Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews
por: Büchter, Roland Brian, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Nudge strategies to improve healthcare providers’ implementation of evidence-based guidelines, policies and practices: a systematic review of trials included within Cochrane systematic reviews
por: Yoong, Sze Lin, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Do guidelines for treating chest disease in children use Cochrane Reviews effectively? A systematic review
por: Prayle, Andrew P, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Sex and gender considerations in implementation interventions to promote shared decision making: A secondary analysis of a Cochrane systematic review
por: Adisso, Évèhouénou Lionel, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cochrane systematic reviews as a source of information for practice and trials
por: Clarke, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Reporting quality of Cochrane systematic reviews with Chinese herbal medicines
por: Zhang, Xuan, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_5cf9dv4b71fbtr7qao0lro7b9o