Cargando…

T-staging of rectal cancer: accuracy of 3.0 Tesla MRI compared with 1.5 Tesla

OBJECTIVES: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is not accurate in discriminating T1-2 from borderline T3 rectal tumors. Higher resolution on 3 Tesla-(3T)-MRI could improve diagnostic performance for T-staging. The aim of this study was to determine whether 3T-MRI compared with 1.5 Tesla-(1.5T)-MRI imp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Maas, Monique, Lambregts, Doenja M. J., Lahaye, Max J., Beets, Geerard L., Backes, Walter, Vliegen, Roy F. A., Osinga-de Jong, Margreet, Wildberger, Joachim E., Beets-Tan, Regina G. H.
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Springer-Verlag 2011
Materias:	Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3345180/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21674192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-011-9770-5

Ejemplares similares

Value of MRI and diffusion-weighted MRI for the diagnosis of locally recurrent rectal cancer
por: Lambregts, Doenja M. J., et al.
Publicado: (2011)

MRI and diffusion-weighted MRI to diagnose a local tumour regrowth during long-term follow-up of rectal cancer patients treated with organ preservation after chemoradiotherapy
por: Lambregts, Doenja M. J., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

MRI anatomy of the rectum: key concepts important for rectal cancer staging and treatment planning
por: Bogveradze, Nino, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Pearls and pitfalls of structured staging and reporting of rectal cancer on MRI: an international multireader study
por: el Khababi, Najim, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Predicting response to chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer via visual morphologic assessment and staging on baseline MRI: a multicenter and multireader study
por: El Khababi, Najim, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Nodal staging in rectal cancer: why is restaging after chemoradiation more accurate than primary nodal staging?
por: Heijnen, Luc A., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Tumour ADC measurements in rectal cancer: effect of ROI methods on ADC values and interobserver variability
por: Lambregts, Doenja M. J., et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Measuring the apparent diffusion coefficient in primary rectal tumors: is there a benefit in performing histogram analyses?
por: van Heeswijk, Miriam M., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Sense and non-sense of imaging in the era of organ preservation for rectal cancer
por: Ou, Xinde, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Good and complete responding locally advanced rectal tumors after chemoradiotherapy: where are the residual positive nodes located on restaging MRI?
por: Heijnen, Luc A., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Magnetization transfer imaging to assess tumour response after chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer
por: Martens, Milou H, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Diffusion-Weighted MRI for Selection of Complete Responders After Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter Study
por: Lambregts, Doenja M. J., et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Optimal imaging staging of rectal cancer
por: Lambregts, Doenja M.J., et al.
Publicado: (2013)

The accuracy of Multi-detector row CT for the assessment of tumor invasion of the mesorectal fascia in primary rectal cancer
por: Vliegen, Roy, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Evolutions in rectal cancer MRI staging and risk stratification in The Netherlands
por: Bogveradze, Nino, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Features on Endoscopy and MRI after Treatment with Contact X-ray Brachytherapy for Rectal Cancer: Explorative Results
por: Custers, Petra A., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Value of ADC measurements for nodal staging after chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer—a per lesion validation study
por: Lambregts, Doenja M. J., et al.
Publicado: (2010)

What is the most accurate whole-body imaging modality for assessment of local and distant recurrent disease in colorectal cancer? A meta-analysis: Imaging for recurrent colorectal cancer
por: Maas, Monique, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Assessment of Clinical Complete Response After Chemoradiation for Rectal Cancer with Digital Rectal Examination, Endoscopy, and MRI: Selection for Organ-Saving Treatment
por: Maas, Monique, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Response evaluation after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer using modern MR imaging: a pictorial review
por: Lambregts, Doenja M. J., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The use of deep learning on endoscopic images to assess the response of rectal cancer after chemoradiation
por: Haak, Hester E., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Development and multicenter validation of a multiparametric imaging model to predict treatment response in rectal cancer
por: Schurink, Niels W., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI at 7.0 Tesla: comparison with 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla
por: Zwanenburg, Jaco J. M., et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Current controversies in TNM for the radiological staging of rectal cancer and how to deal with them: results of a global online survey and multidisciplinary expert consensus
por: Lambregts, Doenja M. J., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

TESLA-Collaboration: TESLA Meeting
por: Collective
Publicado: (1998)

A decade of multi-modality PET and MR imaging in abdominal oncology
por: Min, Lisa A., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Poster 173: Comparison of Sensitivity of Diagnosis of Subscapularis Tear on 1.5 Tesla versus 3.0 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging
por: Neel, Robert, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) is a useful biomarker in predicting metastatic colon cancer using the ADC-value of the primary tumor
por: Nerad, Elias, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Magnetic Resonance of Rectal Cancer Response to Therapy: An Image Quality Comparison between 3.0 and 1.5 Tesla
por: Caruso, Damiano, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Deep Learning for Fully-Automated Localization and Segmentation of Rectal Cancer on Multiparametric MR
por: Trebeschi, Stefano, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

A detector for TESLA, diamond calorimeter development for TESLA, a TPC for TESLA
por: Doucet, M
Publicado: (2001)

Coronary magnetic resonance angiography: in vivo comparison of image quality at 1.5 Tesla versus 3.0 Tesla with Parallel Radiofrequency Transmission
por: Hussain, Tarique, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) Imaging of the Normal Brain: Comparisons between Under the Conditions of 3.0 Tesla and 1.5 Tesla
por: Sohn, Chul-Ho, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Author Correction: Deep Learning for Fully-Automated Localization and Segmentation of Rectal Cancer on Multiparametric MR
por: Trebeschi, Stefano, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

TESLA
por: TESLA. Hamburg
Publicado: (2000)

Adenosine-perfusion at 1.5 Tesla is superior to 3 Tesla for the detection of coronary artery disease
por: Walcher, Thomas, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Reliability of Stereotactic Coordinates of 1.5-Tesla and 3-Tesla MRI in Radiosurgery and Functional Neurosurgery
por: Kim, Hae Yu, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Non-Enhanced MR Imaging of Cerebral Aneurysms: 7 Tesla versus 1.5 Tesla
por: Wrede, Karsten H., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Predictive criteria for MRI-based evaluation of response both during and after radiotherapy for cervical cancer
por: Mongula, Jordy, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Geometric accuracy of 3D coordinates of the Leksell stereotactic skull frame in 1.5 Tesla- and 3.0 Tesla-magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison of three different fixation screw materials
por: Nakazawa, Hisato, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_o6g4umnu3uj4r1tsc2lt6rfh14