Cargando…

Comparison of pain models to detect opioid-induced hyperalgesia

OBJECTIVE: Chronic opioid therapy may be associated with hyperalgesia. Our objective was to determine if opioid-induced hyperalgesia detection sensitivity is dependent on the stimulus used to detect it. METHODS: This open design study compared the detection of hyperalgesia in opioid-dependent subjec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krishnan, Sumithra, Salter, Amy, Sullivan, Thomas, Gentgall, Melanie, White, Jason, Rolan, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3346067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22570562
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S27738
_version_ 1782232186786676736
author Krishnan, Sumithra
Salter, Amy
Sullivan, Thomas
Gentgall, Melanie
White, Jason
Rolan, Paul
author_facet Krishnan, Sumithra
Salter, Amy
Sullivan, Thomas
Gentgall, Melanie
White, Jason
Rolan, Paul
author_sort Krishnan, Sumithra
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Chronic opioid therapy may be associated with hyperalgesia. Our objective was to determine if opioid-induced hyperalgesia detection sensitivity is dependent on the stimulus used to detect it. METHODS: This open design study compared the detection of hyperalgesia in opioid-dependent subjects (n = 16) and healthy control subjects (n = 16) using the following pain stimuli: cold pain, electrical stimulation, mechanical pressure, and ischemic pain. The opioid-dependent subjects were maintained on either methadone (n = 8) or buprenorphine (n = 8) for at least 3 months. None of the controls was dependent on opioids or other drugs of abuse. RESULTS: The opioid-dependent subjects were markedly more sensitive than controls to the cold pain test. Compared with the control group, the hazard ratio for ceasing the test due to intolerable pain was 7.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6–23.3) in the buprenorphine group and 4.5 (95% CI 1.7–15.6) in the methadone group, with similar data for the cold pain threshold. Of the remaining tests, there were differences only for the electrical pain threshold between treatment groups, with the geometric mean threshold in the buprenorphine group being 1.5 (95% CI 1.1–1.9)-fold higher (ie, less sensitive) than that of the controls; the geometric mean for the methadone group was 1.3 (95% CI 1.04–1.7)-fold higher than that of the controls. There were no significant differences between buprenorphine and methadone patients in test responses. Women were more sensitive to the cold pain (hazard ratio for tolerance, 3.1 [95% CI 1.4–7.3]) and ischemic tests (hazard ratio for tolerance, 2.7 [95% CI 1.2–6.1]). There were significant correlations between cold and ischemic tolerances (r = 0.50; P = 0.003) and between electrical and mechanical pain tolerances (r = 0.52; P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that cold pain is the most suitable of the methods tested to detect opioid-induced hyperalgesia. This is consistent with its sensitivity to detect opioid analgesia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3346067
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33460672012-05-08 Comparison of pain models to detect opioid-induced hyperalgesia Krishnan, Sumithra Salter, Amy Sullivan, Thomas Gentgall, Melanie White, Jason Rolan, Paul J Pain Res Original Research OBJECTIVE: Chronic opioid therapy may be associated with hyperalgesia. Our objective was to determine if opioid-induced hyperalgesia detection sensitivity is dependent on the stimulus used to detect it. METHODS: This open design study compared the detection of hyperalgesia in opioid-dependent subjects (n = 16) and healthy control subjects (n = 16) using the following pain stimuli: cold pain, electrical stimulation, mechanical pressure, and ischemic pain. The opioid-dependent subjects were maintained on either methadone (n = 8) or buprenorphine (n = 8) for at least 3 months. None of the controls was dependent on opioids or other drugs of abuse. RESULTS: The opioid-dependent subjects were markedly more sensitive than controls to the cold pain test. Compared with the control group, the hazard ratio for ceasing the test due to intolerable pain was 7.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6–23.3) in the buprenorphine group and 4.5 (95% CI 1.7–15.6) in the methadone group, with similar data for the cold pain threshold. Of the remaining tests, there were differences only for the electrical pain threshold between treatment groups, with the geometric mean threshold in the buprenorphine group being 1.5 (95% CI 1.1–1.9)-fold higher (ie, less sensitive) than that of the controls; the geometric mean for the methadone group was 1.3 (95% CI 1.04–1.7)-fold higher than that of the controls. There were no significant differences between buprenorphine and methadone patients in test responses. Women were more sensitive to the cold pain (hazard ratio for tolerance, 3.1 [95% CI 1.4–7.3]) and ischemic tests (hazard ratio for tolerance, 2.7 [95% CI 1.2–6.1]). There were significant correlations between cold and ischemic tolerances (r = 0.50; P = 0.003) and between electrical and mechanical pain tolerances (r = 0.52; P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that cold pain is the most suitable of the methods tested to detect opioid-induced hyperalgesia. This is consistent with its sensitivity to detect opioid analgesia. Dove Medical Press 2012-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3346067/ /pubmed/22570562 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S27738 Text en © 2012 Krishnan et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Krishnan, Sumithra
Salter, Amy
Sullivan, Thomas
Gentgall, Melanie
White, Jason
Rolan, Paul
Comparison of pain models to detect opioid-induced hyperalgesia
title Comparison of pain models to detect opioid-induced hyperalgesia
title_full Comparison of pain models to detect opioid-induced hyperalgesia
title_fullStr Comparison of pain models to detect opioid-induced hyperalgesia
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of pain models to detect opioid-induced hyperalgesia
title_short Comparison of pain models to detect opioid-induced hyperalgesia
title_sort comparison of pain models to detect opioid-induced hyperalgesia
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3346067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22570562
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S27738
work_keys_str_mv AT krishnansumithra comparisonofpainmodelstodetectopioidinducedhyperalgesia
AT salteramy comparisonofpainmodelstodetectopioidinducedhyperalgesia
AT sullivanthomas comparisonofpainmodelstodetectopioidinducedhyperalgesia
AT gentgallmelanie comparisonofpainmodelstodetectopioidinducedhyperalgesia
AT whitejason comparisonofpainmodelstodetectopioidinducedhyperalgesia
AT rolanpaul comparisonofpainmodelstodetectopioidinducedhyperalgesia