Cargando…

Validation and verification of the OPI 2.0 System

PURPOSE: The Ocular Protection Index (OPI) 2.0 System was developed to evaluate ocular surface protection under a natural blink pattern and normal visual conditions. The OPI 2.0 System implements fully automated software algorithms which provide a real-time measurement of corneal exposure (breakup a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abelson, Richard, Lane, Keith J, Rodriguez, John, Johnston, Patrick, Angjeli, Endri, Ousler, George, Montgomery, Douglas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3346187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22570541
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S29431
_version_ 1782232191063818240
author Abelson, Richard
Lane, Keith J
Rodriguez, John
Johnston, Patrick
Angjeli, Endri
Ousler, George
Montgomery, Douglas
author_facet Abelson, Richard
Lane, Keith J
Rodriguez, John
Johnston, Patrick
Angjeli, Endri
Ousler, George
Montgomery, Douglas
author_sort Abelson, Richard
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The Ocular Protection Index (OPI) 2.0 System was developed to evaluate ocular surface protection under a natural blink pattern and normal visual conditions. The OPI 2.0 System implements fully automated software algorithms which provide a real-time measurement of corneal exposure (breakup area) for each interblink interval during a 1-minute video. Utilizing this method, the mean breakup area (MBA) and OPI 2.0 (MBA/interblink interval) were calculated and analyzed. The purpose of this study was to verify and validate the OPI 2.0 System for its ability to distinguish between dry eye and normal subjects, and to accurately identify breakup area. METHODS: In order to verify and validate the OPI 2.0 System, a series of artificial images and a series of still image frames captured during an actual clinical session using fluorescein staining videography were analyzed. Finally, a clinical validation process was completed to determine the effectiveness and clinical relevance of the OPI 2.0 System to differentiate between dry eye and normal subjects. RESULTS: Software analysis verification conducted in a set of artificially constructed images and in actual videos both saw minimal error rates. MBA and OPI 2.0 calculations were able to distinguish between the qualifying eyes of dry eye and normal subjects in a statistically significant fashion (P < 0.001 for both outcomes). As expected, dry eye subjects had a higher MBA and OPI 2.0 than normal subjects (0.232, dry eye; 0.040, normal and 0.039, dry eye; 0.006, normal, respectively). Results for the worst eyes and all qualifying analyses based on staining, forced-stare tear film breakup time, and MBA were numerically similar. CONCLUSION: The OPI 2.0 System accurately identifies the degree of breakup area on the cornea and represents an efficient, clinically relevant measurement of the pathophysiology of the ocular surface.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3346187
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33461872012-05-08 Validation and verification of the OPI 2.0 System Abelson, Richard Lane, Keith J Rodriguez, John Johnston, Patrick Angjeli, Endri Ousler, George Montgomery, Douglas Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: The Ocular Protection Index (OPI) 2.0 System was developed to evaluate ocular surface protection under a natural blink pattern and normal visual conditions. The OPI 2.0 System implements fully automated software algorithms which provide a real-time measurement of corneal exposure (breakup area) for each interblink interval during a 1-minute video. Utilizing this method, the mean breakup area (MBA) and OPI 2.0 (MBA/interblink interval) were calculated and analyzed. The purpose of this study was to verify and validate the OPI 2.0 System for its ability to distinguish between dry eye and normal subjects, and to accurately identify breakup area. METHODS: In order to verify and validate the OPI 2.0 System, a series of artificial images and a series of still image frames captured during an actual clinical session using fluorescein staining videography were analyzed. Finally, a clinical validation process was completed to determine the effectiveness and clinical relevance of the OPI 2.0 System to differentiate between dry eye and normal subjects. RESULTS: Software analysis verification conducted in a set of artificially constructed images and in actual videos both saw minimal error rates. MBA and OPI 2.0 calculations were able to distinguish between the qualifying eyes of dry eye and normal subjects in a statistically significant fashion (P < 0.001 for both outcomes). As expected, dry eye subjects had a higher MBA and OPI 2.0 than normal subjects (0.232, dry eye; 0.040, normal and 0.039, dry eye; 0.006, normal, respectively). Results for the worst eyes and all qualifying analyses based on staining, forced-stare tear film breakup time, and MBA were numerically similar. CONCLUSION: The OPI 2.0 System accurately identifies the degree of breakup area on the cornea and represents an efficient, clinically relevant measurement of the pathophysiology of the ocular surface. Dove Medical Press 2012 2012-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3346187/ /pubmed/22570541 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S29431 Text en © 2012 Abelson et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Abelson, Richard
Lane, Keith J
Rodriguez, John
Johnston, Patrick
Angjeli, Endri
Ousler, George
Montgomery, Douglas
Validation and verification of the OPI 2.0 System
title Validation and verification of the OPI 2.0 System
title_full Validation and verification of the OPI 2.0 System
title_fullStr Validation and verification of the OPI 2.0 System
title_full_unstemmed Validation and verification of the OPI 2.0 System
title_short Validation and verification of the OPI 2.0 System
title_sort validation and verification of the opi 2.0 system
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3346187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22570541
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S29431
work_keys_str_mv AT abelsonrichard validationandverificationoftheopi20system
AT lanekeithj validationandverificationoftheopi20system
AT rodriguezjohn validationandverificationoftheopi20system
AT johnstonpatrick validationandverificationoftheopi20system
AT angjeliendri validationandverificationoftheopi20system
AT ouslergeorge validationandverificationoftheopi20system
AT montgomerydouglas validationandverificationoftheopi20system