Cargando…

Axillary dissection in primary breast cancer: variations of the surgical technique and influence on morbidity

Lymphedema of the arm is the most common and impairing complication after breast cancer surgery with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Our prospective study evaluated the effect of two different surgical techniques for ALND on postoperative morbidity. Patients were scheduled to undergo ALND. Pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wojcinski, Sebastian, Nuengsri, Sirin, Hillemanns, Peter, Schmidt, Werner, Deryal, Mustafa, Ertan, Kubilay, Degenhardt, Friedrich
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3346198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22570566
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S30207
_version_ 1782232193573060608
author Wojcinski, Sebastian
Nuengsri, Sirin
Hillemanns, Peter
Schmidt, Werner
Deryal, Mustafa
Ertan, Kubilay
Degenhardt, Friedrich
author_facet Wojcinski, Sebastian
Nuengsri, Sirin
Hillemanns, Peter
Schmidt, Werner
Deryal, Mustafa
Ertan, Kubilay
Degenhardt, Friedrich
author_sort Wojcinski, Sebastian
collection PubMed
description Lymphedema of the arm is the most common and impairing complication after breast cancer surgery with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Our prospective study evaluated the effect of two different surgical techniques for ALND on postoperative morbidity. Patients were scheduled to undergo ALND. Patients in group 1 (n = 17) underwent the most common and standard technique of ALND, which uses sharp dissection of the tissue and subsequent electro-coagulation of bleedings. Patients in group 2 (n = 17) underwent a modified standard technique of ALND with clamping and ligatures of all resection margins. Postoperative wound secretion was quantified and patients were followed up for 6 months to assess long-term morbidity. The variations in surgical technique had no significant influence on the outcome variables. However, patients in group 2 showed a tendency to less wound secretion (713 versus 802 mL; P = nonsignificant), a decreased rate of immediate postoperative seromas (11.8 versus 23.5%; P = nonsignificant) and less lymphedema after 3 months (29.4 versus 41.2%; P = nonsignificant). Moreover, the number of resected lymph nodes correlated with the total amount of drained fluid (P = 0.006), the duration of the drain (P = 0.015), and the risk for the development of lymphedema after 3 months (P = 0.016). The described variations in surgical technique had no influence on the outcomes of the patients. The number of resected axillary lymph nodes remains the most important risk factor for treatment-related morbidity. Therefore, a well-balanced choice of the extent of the axillary dissection should be the surgeon’s main concern.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3346198
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33461982012-05-08 Axillary dissection in primary breast cancer: variations of the surgical technique and influence on morbidity Wojcinski, Sebastian Nuengsri, Sirin Hillemanns, Peter Schmidt, Werner Deryal, Mustafa Ertan, Kubilay Degenhardt, Friedrich Cancer Manag Res Original Research Lymphedema of the arm is the most common and impairing complication after breast cancer surgery with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Our prospective study evaluated the effect of two different surgical techniques for ALND on postoperative morbidity. Patients were scheduled to undergo ALND. Patients in group 1 (n = 17) underwent the most common and standard technique of ALND, which uses sharp dissection of the tissue and subsequent electro-coagulation of bleedings. Patients in group 2 (n = 17) underwent a modified standard technique of ALND with clamping and ligatures of all resection margins. Postoperative wound secretion was quantified and patients were followed up for 6 months to assess long-term morbidity. The variations in surgical technique had no significant influence on the outcome variables. However, patients in group 2 showed a tendency to less wound secretion (713 versus 802 mL; P = nonsignificant), a decreased rate of immediate postoperative seromas (11.8 versus 23.5%; P = nonsignificant) and less lymphedema after 3 months (29.4 versus 41.2%; P = nonsignificant). Moreover, the number of resected lymph nodes correlated with the total amount of drained fluid (P = 0.006), the duration of the drain (P = 0.015), and the risk for the development of lymphedema after 3 months (P = 0.016). The described variations in surgical technique had no influence on the outcomes of the patients. The number of resected axillary lymph nodes remains the most important risk factor for treatment-related morbidity. Therefore, a well-balanced choice of the extent of the axillary dissection should be the surgeon’s main concern. Dove Medical Press 2012-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3346198/ /pubmed/22570566 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S30207 Text en © 2012 Wojcinski et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Wojcinski, Sebastian
Nuengsri, Sirin
Hillemanns, Peter
Schmidt, Werner
Deryal, Mustafa
Ertan, Kubilay
Degenhardt, Friedrich
Axillary dissection in primary breast cancer: variations of the surgical technique and influence on morbidity
title Axillary dissection in primary breast cancer: variations of the surgical technique and influence on morbidity
title_full Axillary dissection in primary breast cancer: variations of the surgical technique and influence on morbidity
title_fullStr Axillary dissection in primary breast cancer: variations of the surgical technique and influence on morbidity
title_full_unstemmed Axillary dissection in primary breast cancer: variations of the surgical technique and influence on morbidity
title_short Axillary dissection in primary breast cancer: variations of the surgical technique and influence on morbidity
title_sort axillary dissection in primary breast cancer: variations of the surgical technique and influence on morbidity
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3346198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22570566
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S30207
work_keys_str_mv AT wojcinskisebastian axillarydissectioninprimarybreastcancervariationsofthesurgicaltechniqueandinfluenceonmorbidity
AT nuengsrisirin axillarydissectioninprimarybreastcancervariationsofthesurgicaltechniqueandinfluenceonmorbidity
AT hillemannspeter axillarydissectioninprimarybreastcancervariationsofthesurgicaltechniqueandinfluenceonmorbidity
AT schmidtwerner axillarydissectioninprimarybreastcancervariationsofthesurgicaltechniqueandinfluenceonmorbidity
AT deryalmustafa axillarydissectioninprimarybreastcancervariationsofthesurgicaltechniqueandinfluenceonmorbidity
AT ertankubilay axillarydissectioninprimarybreastcancervariationsofthesurgicaltechniqueandinfluenceonmorbidity
AT degenhardtfriedrich axillarydissectioninprimarybreastcancervariationsofthesurgicaltechniqueandinfluenceonmorbidity