Cargando…
Who Adopts Improved Fuels and Cookstoves? A Systematic Review
Background: The global focus on improved cookstoves (ICSs) and clean fuels has increased because of their potential for delivering triple dividends: household health, local environmental quality, and regional climate benefits. However, ICS and clean fuel dissemination programs have met with low rate...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3346782/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22296719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1104194 |
_version_ | 1782232226751053824 |
---|---|
author | Lewis, Jessica J. Pattanayak, Subhrendu K. |
author_facet | Lewis, Jessica J. Pattanayak, Subhrendu K. |
author_sort | Lewis, Jessica J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The global focus on improved cookstoves (ICSs) and clean fuels has increased because of their potential for delivering triple dividends: household health, local environmental quality, and regional climate benefits. However, ICS and clean fuel dissemination programs have met with low rates of adoption. Objectives: We reviewed empirical studies on ICSs and fuel choice to describe the literature, examine determinants of fuel and stove choice, and identify knowledge gaps. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature on the adoption of ICSs or cleaner fuels by households in developing countries. Results are synthesized through a simple vote-counting meta-analysis. Results: We identified 32 research studies that reported 146 separate regression analyses of ICS adoption (11 analyses) or fuel choice (135 analyses) from Asia (60%), Africa (27%), and Latin America (19%). Most studies apply multivariate regression methods to consider 7–13 determinants of choice. Income, education, and urban location were positively associated with adoption in most but not all studies. However, the influence of fuel availability and prices, household size and composition, and sex is unclear. Potentially important drivers such as credit, supply-chain strengthening, and social marketing have been ignored. Conclusions: Adoption studies of ICSs or clean energy are scarce, scattered, and of differential quality, even though global distribution programs are quickly expanding. Future research should examine an expanded set of contextual variables to improve implementation of stove programs that can realize the “win-win-win” of health, local environmental quality, and climate associated with these technologies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3346782 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33467822012-05-29 Who Adopts Improved Fuels and Cookstoves? A Systematic Review Lewis, Jessica J. Pattanayak, Subhrendu K. Environ Health Perspect Review Background: The global focus on improved cookstoves (ICSs) and clean fuels has increased because of their potential for delivering triple dividends: household health, local environmental quality, and regional climate benefits. However, ICS and clean fuel dissemination programs have met with low rates of adoption. Objectives: We reviewed empirical studies on ICSs and fuel choice to describe the literature, examine determinants of fuel and stove choice, and identify knowledge gaps. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature on the adoption of ICSs or cleaner fuels by households in developing countries. Results are synthesized through a simple vote-counting meta-analysis. Results: We identified 32 research studies that reported 146 separate regression analyses of ICS adoption (11 analyses) or fuel choice (135 analyses) from Asia (60%), Africa (27%), and Latin America (19%). Most studies apply multivariate regression methods to consider 7–13 determinants of choice. Income, education, and urban location were positively associated with adoption in most but not all studies. However, the influence of fuel availability and prices, household size and composition, and sex is unclear. Potentially important drivers such as credit, supply-chain strengthening, and social marketing have been ignored. Conclusions: Adoption studies of ICSs or clean energy are scarce, scattered, and of differential quality, even though global distribution programs are quickly expanding. Future research should examine an expanded set of contextual variables to improve implementation of stove programs that can realize the “win-win-win” of health, local environmental quality, and climate associated with these technologies. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2012-02-01 2012-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3346782/ /pubmed/22296719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1104194 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, ?Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives?); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright. |
spellingShingle | Review Lewis, Jessica J. Pattanayak, Subhrendu K. Who Adopts Improved Fuels and Cookstoves? A Systematic Review |
title | Who Adopts Improved Fuels and Cookstoves? A Systematic Review |
title_full | Who Adopts Improved Fuels and Cookstoves? A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Who Adopts Improved Fuels and Cookstoves? A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Who Adopts Improved Fuels and Cookstoves? A Systematic Review |
title_short | Who Adopts Improved Fuels and Cookstoves? A Systematic Review |
title_sort | who adopts improved fuels and cookstoves? a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3346782/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22296719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1104194 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lewisjessicaj whoadoptsimprovedfuelsandcookstovesasystematicreview AT pattanayaksubhrenduk whoadoptsimprovedfuelsandcookstovesasystematicreview |