Cargando…

Muscle or Motivation? A Stop-Signal Study on the Effects of Sequential Cognitive Control

Performance on cognitive control tasks deteriorates when control tasks are performed together with other control tasks, that is, if simultaneous cognitive control is required. Surprisingly, this is also observed if control tasks are preceded by other control tasks, that is, if sequential cognitive c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huizenga, Hilde M., van der Molen, Maurits W., Bexkens, Anika, Bos, Marieke G. N., van den Wildenberg, Wery P. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3347221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22586413
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00126
_version_ 1782232270013202432
author Huizenga, Hilde M.
van der Molen, Maurits W.
Bexkens, Anika
Bos, Marieke G. N.
van den Wildenberg, Wery P. M.
author_facet Huizenga, Hilde M.
van der Molen, Maurits W.
Bexkens, Anika
Bos, Marieke G. N.
van den Wildenberg, Wery P. M.
author_sort Huizenga, Hilde M.
collection PubMed
description Performance on cognitive control tasks deteriorates when control tasks are performed together with other control tasks, that is, if simultaneous cognitive control is required. Surprisingly, this is also observed if control tasks are preceded by other control tasks, that is, if sequential cognitive control is required. The typical explanation for the latter finding is that previous acts of cognitive control deplete a common resource, just like a muscle becomes fatigued after repeated usage. An alternative explanation, however, is that previous acts of cognitive control reduce motivation to match allocated resources to required resources. In this paper we formalize these muscle and motivation accounts, and show that they yield differential predictions regarding the interaction between simultaneous and sequential cognitive control. These predictions were tested using a paradigm where participants had to perform multiple stop-signal tasks, which varied in their demands on simultaneous and sequential control. Results of two studies supported predictions derived from the motivation account. Therefore, we conclude that the effects of sequential cognitive control are best explained in terms of a reduction of motivation to match allocated to required resources.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3347221
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33472212012-05-14 Muscle or Motivation? A Stop-Signal Study on the Effects of Sequential Cognitive Control Huizenga, Hilde M. van der Molen, Maurits W. Bexkens, Anika Bos, Marieke G. N. van den Wildenberg, Wery P. M. Front Psychol Psychology Performance on cognitive control tasks deteriorates when control tasks are performed together with other control tasks, that is, if simultaneous cognitive control is required. Surprisingly, this is also observed if control tasks are preceded by other control tasks, that is, if sequential cognitive control is required. The typical explanation for the latter finding is that previous acts of cognitive control deplete a common resource, just like a muscle becomes fatigued after repeated usage. An alternative explanation, however, is that previous acts of cognitive control reduce motivation to match allocated resources to required resources. In this paper we formalize these muscle and motivation accounts, and show that they yield differential predictions regarding the interaction between simultaneous and sequential cognitive control. These predictions were tested using a paradigm where participants had to perform multiple stop-signal tasks, which varied in their demands on simultaneous and sequential control. Results of two studies supported predictions derived from the motivation account. Therefore, we conclude that the effects of sequential cognitive control are best explained in terms of a reduction of motivation to match allocated to required resources. Frontiers Research Foundation 2012-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3347221/ /pubmed/22586413 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00126 Text en Copyright © 2012 Huizenga, van der Molen, Bexkens, Bos and van den Wildenberg. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial License, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited.
spellingShingle Psychology
Huizenga, Hilde M.
van der Molen, Maurits W.
Bexkens, Anika
Bos, Marieke G. N.
van den Wildenberg, Wery P. M.
Muscle or Motivation? A Stop-Signal Study on the Effects of Sequential Cognitive Control
title Muscle or Motivation? A Stop-Signal Study on the Effects of Sequential Cognitive Control
title_full Muscle or Motivation? A Stop-Signal Study on the Effects of Sequential Cognitive Control
title_fullStr Muscle or Motivation? A Stop-Signal Study on the Effects of Sequential Cognitive Control
title_full_unstemmed Muscle or Motivation? A Stop-Signal Study on the Effects of Sequential Cognitive Control
title_short Muscle or Motivation? A Stop-Signal Study on the Effects of Sequential Cognitive Control
title_sort muscle or motivation? a stop-signal study on the effects of sequential cognitive control
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3347221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22586413
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00126
work_keys_str_mv AT huizengahildem muscleormotivationastopsignalstudyontheeffectsofsequentialcognitivecontrol
AT vandermolenmauritsw muscleormotivationastopsignalstudyontheeffectsofsequentialcognitivecontrol
AT bexkensanika muscleormotivationastopsignalstudyontheeffectsofsequentialcognitivecontrol
AT bosmariekegn muscleormotivationastopsignalstudyontheeffectsofsequentialcognitivecontrol
AT vandenwildenbergwerypm muscleormotivationastopsignalstudyontheeffectsofsequentialcognitivecontrol