Cargando…

A Comparison between the hp-version of Finite Element Method with EIDORS for Electrical Impedance Tomography

In this study, a hp-version of Finite Element Method (FEM) was applied for forward modeling in image reconstruction of Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT). The EIT forward solver is normally based on the conventional Finite Element Method (h-FEM). In h-FEM, the polynomial order (p) of the element...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saeedizadeh, N., Kermani, S., Rabbani, H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3347226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22606676
_version_ 1782232271162441728
author Saeedizadeh, N.
Kermani, S.
Rabbani, H.
author_facet Saeedizadeh, N.
Kermani, S.
Rabbani, H.
author_sort Saeedizadeh, N.
collection PubMed
description In this study, a hp-version of Finite Element Method (FEM) was applied for forward modeling in image reconstruction of Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT). The EIT forward solver is normally based on the conventional Finite Element Method (h-FEM). In h-FEM, the polynomial order (p) of the element shape functions is constant and the element size (h) is decreasing. To have an accurate simulation with the h-FEM, a mesh with large number of nodes and elements is usually needed. In order to overcome this problem, the high order finite element method (p-FEM) was proposed. In the p-version, the polynomial order is increasing and the mesh size is constant. Combining the advantages of two previously mentioned methods, the element size (h) was decreased and the polynomial order (p) was increased, simultaneously, which is called the hp-version of Finite Element Method (hp-FEM). The hp-FEM needs a smaller number of nodes and consequently, less computational time and less memory to achieve the same or even better accuracy than h-FEM. The SNR value is 42db for hp-FEM and is 9db for h-FEM. The numerical results are presented and verified that the performance of the hp-version is better than of the h-version in image reconstruction of EIT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3347226
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33472262012-05-09 A Comparison between the hp-version of Finite Element Method with EIDORS for Electrical Impedance Tomography Saeedizadeh, N. Kermani, S. Rabbani, H. J Med Signals Sens Original Article In this study, a hp-version of Finite Element Method (FEM) was applied for forward modeling in image reconstruction of Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT). The EIT forward solver is normally based on the conventional Finite Element Method (h-FEM). In h-FEM, the polynomial order (p) of the element shape functions is constant and the element size (h) is decreasing. To have an accurate simulation with the h-FEM, a mesh with large number of nodes and elements is usually needed. In order to overcome this problem, the high order finite element method (p-FEM) was proposed. In the p-version, the polynomial order is increasing and the mesh size is constant. Combining the advantages of two previously mentioned methods, the element size (h) was decreased and the polynomial order (p) was increased, simultaneously, which is called the hp-version of Finite Element Method (hp-FEM). The hp-FEM needs a smaller number of nodes and consequently, less computational time and less memory to achieve the same or even better accuracy than h-FEM. The SNR value is 42db for hp-FEM and is 9db for h-FEM. The numerical results are presented and verified that the performance of the hp-version is better than of the h-version in image reconstruction of EIT. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3347226/ /pubmed/22606676 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Medical Signals and Sensors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Saeedizadeh, N.
Kermani, S.
Rabbani, H.
A Comparison between the hp-version of Finite Element Method with EIDORS for Electrical Impedance Tomography
title A Comparison between the hp-version of Finite Element Method with EIDORS for Electrical Impedance Tomography
title_full A Comparison between the hp-version of Finite Element Method with EIDORS for Electrical Impedance Tomography
title_fullStr A Comparison between the hp-version of Finite Element Method with EIDORS for Electrical Impedance Tomography
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison between the hp-version of Finite Element Method with EIDORS for Electrical Impedance Tomography
title_short A Comparison between the hp-version of Finite Element Method with EIDORS for Electrical Impedance Tomography
title_sort comparison between the hp-version of finite element method with eidors for electrical impedance tomography
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3347226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22606676
work_keys_str_mv AT saeedizadehn acomparisonbetweenthehpversionoffiniteelementmethodwitheidorsforelectricalimpedancetomography
AT kermanis acomparisonbetweenthehpversionoffiniteelementmethodwitheidorsforelectricalimpedancetomography
AT rabbanih acomparisonbetweenthehpversionoffiniteelementmethodwitheidorsforelectricalimpedancetomography
AT saeedizadehn comparisonbetweenthehpversionoffiniteelementmethodwitheidorsforelectricalimpedancetomography
AT kermanis comparisonbetweenthehpversionoffiniteelementmethodwitheidorsforelectricalimpedancetomography
AT rabbanih comparisonbetweenthehpversionoffiniteelementmethodwitheidorsforelectricalimpedancetomography