Cargando…

Fingerprint-like Analysis of “Nanoantibody” Selection by Phage Display Using Two Helper Phage Variants

This paper discusses the selection of mini-antibody (nanoantibody, nanobody® or single domain antibody) sequences of desired specificity by phage display-based method using a generated library of antigen-binding domains of special heavy-chain only antibodies (single-stranded antibodies) of immunized...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tillib, S.V., Ivanova, T.I., Vasilev, L.A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: A.I. Gordeyev 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3347569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22649655
_version_ 1782232294911639552
author Tillib, S.V.
Ivanova, T.I.
Vasilev, L.A.
author_facet Tillib, S.V.
Ivanova, T.I.
Vasilev, L.A.
author_sort Tillib, S.V.
collection PubMed
description This paper discusses the selection of mini-antibody (nanoantibody, nanobody® or single domain antibody) sequences of desired specificity by phage display-based method using a generated library of antigen-binding domains of special heavy-chain only antibodies (single-stranded antibodies) of immunized camel. A comprehensive comparison of the efficiency of parallel selection procedures was performed by using the traditional (M13KO7) and modified (with N-terminal deletion in the surface gIII protein) helper phages. These two methods are partly complementary, and by using them in parallel one can significantly improve the selection efficiency. Parallel restriction analysis (fingerprinting) of PCR-amplified cloned sequences coding for mini-antibodies (HMR-analysis) is proposed for identifying individual clones, as a replacement to sequencing (to a certain extent). Using this method, unique data were collected on the selection of mini-antibody variants with the required specificity at various stages of a multi-stage selection procedure. It has been shown that different sequences coding for mini-antibodies are selected in different ways, and that, if this feature is not taken into account, some mini-antibody variants may be lost.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3347569
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher A.I. Gordeyev
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33475692012-05-30 Fingerprint-like Analysis of “Nanoantibody” Selection by Phage Display Using Two Helper Phage Variants Tillib, S.V. Ivanova, T.I. Vasilev, L.A. Acta Naturae Research Article This paper discusses the selection of mini-antibody (nanoantibody, nanobody® or single domain antibody) sequences of desired specificity by phage display-based method using a generated library of antigen-binding domains of special heavy-chain only antibodies (single-stranded antibodies) of immunized camel. A comprehensive comparison of the efficiency of parallel selection procedures was performed by using the traditional (M13KO7) and modified (with N-terminal deletion in the surface gIII protein) helper phages. These two methods are partly complementary, and by using them in parallel one can significantly improve the selection efficiency. Parallel restriction analysis (fingerprinting) of PCR-amplified cloned sequences coding for mini-antibodies (HMR-analysis) is proposed for identifying individual clones, as a replacement to sequencing (to a certain extent). Using this method, unique data were collected on the selection of mini-antibody variants with the required specificity at various stages of a multi-stage selection procedure. It has been shown that different sequences coding for mini-antibodies are selected in different ways, and that, if this feature is not taken into account, some mini-antibody variants may be lost. A.I. Gordeyev 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC3347569/ /pubmed/22649655 Text en Copyright © 2010 Park-media Ltd. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tillib, S.V.
Ivanova, T.I.
Vasilev, L.A.
Fingerprint-like Analysis of “Nanoantibody” Selection by Phage Display Using Two Helper Phage Variants
title Fingerprint-like Analysis of “Nanoantibody” Selection by Phage Display Using Two Helper Phage Variants
title_full Fingerprint-like Analysis of “Nanoantibody” Selection by Phage Display Using Two Helper Phage Variants
title_fullStr Fingerprint-like Analysis of “Nanoantibody” Selection by Phage Display Using Two Helper Phage Variants
title_full_unstemmed Fingerprint-like Analysis of “Nanoantibody” Selection by Phage Display Using Two Helper Phage Variants
title_short Fingerprint-like Analysis of “Nanoantibody” Selection by Phage Display Using Two Helper Phage Variants
title_sort fingerprint-like analysis of “nanoantibody” selection by phage display using two helper phage variants
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3347569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22649655
work_keys_str_mv AT tillibsv fingerprintlikeanalysisofnanoantibodyselectionbyphagedisplayusingtwohelperphagevariants
AT ivanovati fingerprintlikeanalysisofnanoantibodyselectionbyphagedisplayusingtwohelperphagevariants
AT vasilevla fingerprintlikeanalysisofnanoantibodyselectionbyphagedisplayusingtwohelperphagevariants