Cargando…

An anthropometric model to estimate neonatal fat mass using air displacement plethysmography

BACKGROUND: Current validated neonatal body composition methods are limited/impractical for use outside of a clinical setting because they are labor intensive, time consuming, and require expensive equipment. The purpose of this study was to develop an anthropometric model to estimate neonatal fat m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deierlein, Andrea L, Thornton, John, Hull, Holly, Paley, Charles, Gallagher, Dympna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3348023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22436534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-7075-9-21
_version_ 1782232354382675968
author Deierlein, Andrea L
Thornton, John
Hull, Holly
Paley, Charles
Gallagher, Dympna
author_facet Deierlein, Andrea L
Thornton, John
Hull, Holly
Paley, Charles
Gallagher, Dympna
author_sort Deierlein, Andrea L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current validated neonatal body composition methods are limited/impractical for use outside of a clinical setting because they are labor intensive, time consuming, and require expensive equipment. The purpose of this study was to develop an anthropometric model to estimate neonatal fat mass (kg) using an air displacement plethysmography (PEA POD(® )Infant Body Composition System) as the criterion. METHODS: A total of 128 healthy term infants, 60 females and 68 males, from a multiethnic cohort were included in the analyses. Gender, race/ethnicity, gestational age, age (in days), anthropometric measurements of weight, length, abdominal circumference, skin-fold thicknesses (triceps, biceps, sub scapular, and thigh), and body composition by PEA POD(® )were collected within 1-3 days of birth. Backward stepwise linear regression was used to determine the model that best predicted neonatal fat mass. RESULTS: The statistical model that best predicted neonatal fat mass (kg) was: -0.012 -0.064*gender + 0.024*day of measurement post-delivery -0.150*weight (kg) + 0.055*weight (kg)(2 )+ 0.046*ethnicity + 0.020*sum of three skin-fold thicknesses (triceps, sub scapular, and thigh); R(2 )= 0.81, MSE = 0.08 kg. CONCLUSIONS: Our anthropometric model explained 81% of the variance in neonatal fat mass. Future studies with a greater variety of neonatal anthropometric measurements may provide equations that explain more of the variance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3348023
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33480232012-05-09 An anthropometric model to estimate neonatal fat mass using air displacement plethysmography Deierlein, Andrea L Thornton, John Hull, Holly Paley, Charles Gallagher, Dympna Nutr Metab (Lond) Research BACKGROUND: Current validated neonatal body composition methods are limited/impractical for use outside of a clinical setting because they are labor intensive, time consuming, and require expensive equipment. The purpose of this study was to develop an anthropometric model to estimate neonatal fat mass (kg) using an air displacement plethysmography (PEA POD(® )Infant Body Composition System) as the criterion. METHODS: A total of 128 healthy term infants, 60 females and 68 males, from a multiethnic cohort were included in the analyses. Gender, race/ethnicity, gestational age, age (in days), anthropometric measurements of weight, length, abdominal circumference, skin-fold thicknesses (triceps, biceps, sub scapular, and thigh), and body composition by PEA POD(® )were collected within 1-3 days of birth. Backward stepwise linear regression was used to determine the model that best predicted neonatal fat mass. RESULTS: The statistical model that best predicted neonatal fat mass (kg) was: -0.012 -0.064*gender + 0.024*day of measurement post-delivery -0.150*weight (kg) + 0.055*weight (kg)(2 )+ 0.046*ethnicity + 0.020*sum of three skin-fold thicknesses (triceps, sub scapular, and thigh); R(2 )= 0.81, MSE = 0.08 kg. CONCLUSIONS: Our anthropometric model explained 81% of the variance in neonatal fat mass. Future studies with a greater variety of neonatal anthropometric measurements may provide equations that explain more of the variance. BioMed Central 2012-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3348023/ /pubmed/22436534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-7075-9-21 Text en Copyright ©2012 Deierlein et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Deierlein, Andrea L
Thornton, John
Hull, Holly
Paley, Charles
Gallagher, Dympna
An anthropometric model to estimate neonatal fat mass using air displacement plethysmography
title An anthropometric model to estimate neonatal fat mass using air displacement plethysmography
title_full An anthropometric model to estimate neonatal fat mass using air displacement plethysmography
title_fullStr An anthropometric model to estimate neonatal fat mass using air displacement plethysmography
title_full_unstemmed An anthropometric model to estimate neonatal fat mass using air displacement plethysmography
title_short An anthropometric model to estimate neonatal fat mass using air displacement plethysmography
title_sort anthropometric model to estimate neonatal fat mass using air displacement plethysmography
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3348023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22436534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-7075-9-21
work_keys_str_mv AT deierleinandreal ananthropometricmodeltoestimateneonatalfatmassusingairdisplacementplethysmography
AT thorntonjohn ananthropometricmodeltoestimateneonatalfatmassusingairdisplacementplethysmography
AT hullholly ananthropometricmodeltoestimateneonatalfatmassusingairdisplacementplethysmography
AT paleycharles ananthropometricmodeltoestimateneonatalfatmassusingairdisplacementplethysmography
AT gallagherdympna ananthropometricmodeltoestimateneonatalfatmassusingairdisplacementplethysmography
AT deierleinandreal anthropometricmodeltoestimateneonatalfatmassusingairdisplacementplethysmography
AT thorntonjohn anthropometricmodeltoestimateneonatalfatmassusingairdisplacementplethysmography
AT hullholly anthropometricmodeltoestimateneonatalfatmassusingairdisplacementplethysmography
AT paleycharles anthropometricmodeltoestimateneonatalfatmassusingairdisplacementplethysmography
AT gallagherdympna anthropometricmodeltoestimateneonatalfatmassusingairdisplacementplethysmography