Cargando…
Standard errors and confidence intervals in within-subjects designs: Generalizing Loftus and Masson (1994) and avoiding the biases of alternative accounts
Repeated measures designs are common in experimental psychology. Because of the correlational structure in these designs, the calculation and interpretation of confidence intervals is nontrivial. One solution was provided by Loftus and Masson (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1:476–490, 1994). This...
Autores principales: | Franz, Volker H., Loftus, Geoffrey R. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3348489/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22441956 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0230-1 |
Ejemplares similares
-
On the interpretation of removable interactions: A survey of the field 33 years after Loftus
por: Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Confidence interval approach for evaluating bias in laboratory methods
por: Yee, K. F.
Publicado: (1988) -
Natural statistics support a rational account of confidence biases
por: Webb, Taylor W., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Correcting the Bias Correction for the Bootstrap Confidence Interval in Mediation Analysis
por: Tibbe, Tristan D., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Alternatives to P value: confidence interval and effect size
por: Lee, Dong Kyu
Publicado: (2016)