Cargando…

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of azilsartan with that of candesartan cilexetil in Japanese patients with grade I–II essential hypertension: a randomized, double-blind clinical study

Azilsartan is a novel angiotensin receptor blocker being developed for hypertension treatment. This 16-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study compared the efficacy and safety of azilsartan (20–40 mg once daily by forced titration) and its ability to provide 24-h blood pressure (BP) contro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rakugi, Hiromi, Enya, Kazuaki, Sugiura, Kenkichi, Ikeda, Yoshinori
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3348575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22278628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/hr.2012.8
_version_ 1782232399475638272
author Rakugi, Hiromi
Enya, Kazuaki
Sugiura, Kenkichi
Ikeda, Yoshinori
author_facet Rakugi, Hiromi
Enya, Kazuaki
Sugiura, Kenkichi
Ikeda, Yoshinori
author_sort Rakugi, Hiromi
collection PubMed
description Azilsartan is a novel angiotensin receptor blocker being developed for hypertension treatment. This 16-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study compared the efficacy and safety of azilsartan (20–40 mg once daily by forced titration) and its ability to provide 24-h blood pressure (BP) control, with that of candesartan cilexetil (candesartan; 8–12 mg once daily by forced titration) in 622 Japanese patients with grade I–II essential hypertension. Efficacy was evaluated by clinic-measured sitting BP, and by ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) at week 14. Participants (mean age: 57 years, 61% males) had a mean baseline sitting BP of 159.8/100.4 mm Hg. The mean change from baseline in sitting diastolic BP at week 16 (primary endpoint) was −12.4 mm Hg in the azilsartan group and −9.8 mm Hg in the candesartan group, demonstrating a statistically significant greater reduction with azilsartan vs. candesartan (difference: −2.6 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval (CI): −4.08 to −1.22 mm Hg, P=0.0003). The week 16 (secondary endpoint) mean change from baseline in sitting systolic BP was −21.8 mm Hg and −17.5 mm Hg, respectively, a significant decrease with azilsartan vs. candesartan (difference: −4.4 mm Hg, 95% CI: −6.53 to −2.20 mm Hg, P<0.0001). On ABPM, the week 14 mean changes from baseline in diastolic and systolic BP were also significantly greater with azilsartan over a 24-h period, and during the daytime, night-time and early morning. Safety and tolerability were similar among the two groups. These data demonstrate that once-daily azilsartan provides a more potent 24-h sustained antihypertensive effect than that of candesartan but with equivalent safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3348575
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33485752012-05-09 Comparison of the efficacy and safety of azilsartan with that of candesartan cilexetil in Japanese patients with grade I–II essential hypertension: a randomized, double-blind clinical study Rakugi, Hiromi Enya, Kazuaki Sugiura, Kenkichi Ikeda, Yoshinori Hypertens Res Original Article Azilsartan is a novel angiotensin receptor blocker being developed for hypertension treatment. This 16-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study compared the efficacy and safety of azilsartan (20–40 mg once daily by forced titration) and its ability to provide 24-h blood pressure (BP) control, with that of candesartan cilexetil (candesartan; 8–12 mg once daily by forced titration) in 622 Japanese patients with grade I–II essential hypertension. Efficacy was evaluated by clinic-measured sitting BP, and by ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) at week 14. Participants (mean age: 57 years, 61% males) had a mean baseline sitting BP of 159.8/100.4 mm Hg. The mean change from baseline in sitting diastolic BP at week 16 (primary endpoint) was −12.4 mm Hg in the azilsartan group and −9.8 mm Hg in the candesartan group, demonstrating a statistically significant greater reduction with azilsartan vs. candesartan (difference: −2.6 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval (CI): −4.08 to −1.22 mm Hg, P=0.0003). The week 16 (secondary endpoint) mean change from baseline in sitting systolic BP was −21.8 mm Hg and −17.5 mm Hg, respectively, a significant decrease with azilsartan vs. candesartan (difference: −4.4 mm Hg, 95% CI: −6.53 to −2.20 mm Hg, P<0.0001). On ABPM, the week 14 mean changes from baseline in diastolic and systolic BP were also significantly greater with azilsartan over a 24-h period, and during the daytime, night-time and early morning. Safety and tolerability were similar among the two groups. These data demonstrate that once-daily azilsartan provides a more potent 24-h sustained antihypertensive effect than that of candesartan but with equivalent safety. Nature Publishing Group 2012-05 2012-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3348575/ /pubmed/22278628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/hr.2012.8 Text en Copyright © 2012 The Japanese Society of Hypertension http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Rakugi, Hiromi
Enya, Kazuaki
Sugiura, Kenkichi
Ikeda, Yoshinori
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of azilsartan with that of candesartan cilexetil in Japanese patients with grade I–II essential hypertension: a randomized, double-blind clinical study
title Comparison of the efficacy and safety of azilsartan with that of candesartan cilexetil in Japanese patients with grade I–II essential hypertension: a randomized, double-blind clinical study
title_full Comparison of the efficacy and safety of azilsartan with that of candesartan cilexetil in Japanese patients with grade I–II essential hypertension: a randomized, double-blind clinical study
title_fullStr Comparison of the efficacy and safety of azilsartan with that of candesartan cilexetil in Japanese patients with grade I–II essential hypertension: a randomized, double-blind clinical study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the efficacy and safety of azilsartan with that of candesartan cilexetil in Japanese patients with grade I–II essential hypertension: a randomized, double-blind clinical study
title_short Comparison of the efficacy and safety of azilsartan with that of candesartan cilexetil in Japanese patients with grade I–II essential hypertension: a randomized, double-blind clinical study
title_sort comparison of the efficacy and safety of azilsartan with that of candesartan cilexetil in japanese patients with grade i–ii essential hypertension: a randomized, double-blind clinical study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3348575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22278628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/hr.2012.8
work_keys_str_mv AT rakugihiromi comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofazilsartanwiththatofcandesartancilexetilinjapanesepatientswithgradeiiiessentialhypertensionarandomizeddoubleblindclinicalstudy
AT enyakazuaki comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofazilsartanwiththatofcandesartancilexetilinjapanesepatientswithgradeiiiessentialhypertensionarandomizeddoubleblindclinicalstudy
AT sugiurakenkichi comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofazilsartanwiththatofcandesartancilexetilinjapanesepatientswithgradeiiiessentialhypertensionarandomizeddoubleblindclinicalstudy
AT ikedayoshinori comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofazilsartanwiththatofcandesartancilexetilinjapanesepatientswithgradeiiiessentialhypertensionarandomizeddoubleblindclinicalstudy