Cargando…

Differences in tibiofemoral kinematics between the unloaded robotic passive path and a weightbearing knee simulator

Cadaveric in vitro studies are essential to test hypotheses concerning surgical manipulations in the same individual. Robotic technologies as well as different knee-models have been developed to get an in-depth comprehension of knee joint kinematics. The purpose of this study was to compare utilizat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wünschel, Markus, Leichtle, Ulf, Lo, JiaHsuan, Wülker, Nikolaus, Müller, Otto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PAGEPress Publications 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3348690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22577503
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2012.e2
_version_ 1782232412436037632
author Wünschel, Markus
Leichtle, Ulf
Lo, JiaHsuan
Wülker, Nikolaus
Müller, Otto
author_facet Wünschel, Markus
Leichtle, Ulf
Lo, JiaHsuan
Wülker, Nikolaus
Müller, Otto
author_sort Wünschel, Markus
collection PubMed
description Cadaveric in vitro studies are essential to test hypotheses concerning surgical manipulations in the same individual. Robotic technologies as well as different knee-models have been developed to get an in-depth comprehension of knee joint kinematics. The purpose of this study was to compare utilization of these different established principles. Ten human cadaveric knee specimens were used to measure the kinematics during a weight-bearing flexion in a 6-degrees-of-freedom knee simulator. While flexing the knee, joint quadriceps muscle forces were dynamically simulated to reach a vertical ground reaction force of 100N. Fourteen knee specimens were mounted in 6-degrees-of-freedom robotic manipulator with a universal force sensor. The unloaded flexing motion of each specimen was measured by finding positions for each degree of flexion where all forces are minimal (passive path). The kinematic data of the knee-simulator and the robot concerning internal-external rotation, anterior-posterior translation, varus-valgus motion, and medial-lateral translation was examined. For all investigated degrees of freedom the kinematics of the robotic passive path differed from the loaded kinematics in the knee simulator. Simulated bodyweight as well as the examination method used has a substantial influence on joint kinematics during flexion which has to be considered when interpreting biomechanical studies as well as clinical tests.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3348690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher PAGEPress Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33486902012-05-10 Differences in tibiofemoral kinematics between the unloaded robotic passive path and a weightbearing knee simulator Wünschel, Markus Leichtle, Ulf Lo, JiaHsuan Wülker, Nikolaus Müller, Otto Orthop Rev (Pavia) Article Cadaveric in vitro studies are essential to test hypotheses concerning surgical manipulations in the same individual. Robotic technologies as well as different knee-models have been developed to get an in-depth comprehension of knee joint kinematics. The purpose of this study was to compare utilization of these different established principles. Ten human cadaveric knee specimens were used to measure the kinematics during a weight-bearing flexion in a 6-degrees-of-freedom knee simulator. While flexing the knee, joint quadriceps muscle forces were dynamically simulated to reach a vertical ground reaction force of 100N. Fourteen knee specimens were mounted in 6-degrees-of-freedom robotic manipulator with a universal force sensor. The unloaded flexing motion of each specimen was measured by finding positions for each degree of flexion where all forces are minimal (passive path). The kinematic data of the knee-simulator and the robot concerning internal-external rotation, anterior-posterior translation, varus-valgus motion, and medial-lateral translation was examined. For all investigated degrees of freedom the kinematics of the robotic passive path differed from the loaded kinematics in the knee simulator. Simulated bodyweight as well as the examination method used has a substantial influence on joint kinematics during flexion which has to be considered when interpreting biomechanical studies as well as clinical tests. PAGEPress Publications 2012-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3348690/ /pubmed/22577503 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2012.e2 Text en ©Copyright M. Wünschel et al., 2012 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Licensee PAGEPress, Italy
spellingShingle Article
Wünschel, Markus
Leichtle, Ulf
Lo, JiaHsuan
Wülker, Nikolaus
Müller, Otto
Differences in tibiofemoral kinematics between the unloaded robotic passive path and a weightbearing knee simulator
title Differences in tibiofemoral kinematics between the unloaded robotic passive path and a weightbearing knee simulator
title_full Differences in tibiofemoral kinematics between the unloaded robotic passive path and a weightbearing knee simulator
title_fullStr Differences in tibiofemoral kinematics between the unloaded robotic passive path and a weightbearing knee simulator
title_full_unstemmed Differences in tibiofemoral kinematics between the unloaded robotic passive path and a weightbearing knee simulator
title_short Differences in tibiofemoral kinematics between the unloaded robotic passive path and a weightbearing knee simulator
title_sort differences in tibiofemoral kinematics between the unloaded robotic passive path and a weightbearing knee simulator
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3348690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22577503
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2012.e2
work_keys_str_mv AT wunschelmarkus differencesintibiofemoralkinematicsbetweentheunloadedroboticpassivepathandaweightbearingkneesimulator
AT leichtleulf differencesintibiofemoralkinematicsbetweentheunloadedroboticpassivepathandaweightbearingkneesimulator
AT lojiahsuan differencesintibiofemoralkinematicsbetweentheunloadedroboticpassivepathandaweightbearingkneesimulator
AT wulkernikolaus differencesintibiofemoralkinematicsbetweentheunloadedroboticpassivepathandaweightbearingkneesimulator
AT mullerotto differencesintibiofemoralkinematicsbetweentheunloadedroboticpassivepathandaweightbearingkneesimulator