Cargando…
Differences in tibiofemoral kinematics between the unloaded robotic passive path and a weightbearing knee simulator
Cadaveric in vitro studies are essential to test hypotheses concerning surgical manipulations in the same individual. Robotic technologies as well as different knee-models have been developed to get an in-depth comprehension of knee joint kinematics. The purpose of this study was to compare utilizat...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PAGEPress Publications
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3348690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22577503 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2012.e2 |
_version_ | 1782232412436037632 |
---|---|
author | Wünschel, Markus Leichtle, Ulf Lo, JiaHsuan Wülker, Nikolaus Müller, Otto |
author_facet | Wünschel, Markus Leichtle, Ulf Lo, JiaHsuan Wülker, Nikolaus Müller, Otto |
author_sort | Wünschel, Markus |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cadaveric in vitro studies are essential to test hypotheses concerning surgical manipulations in the same individual. Robotic technologies as well as different knee-models have been developed to get an in-depth comprehension of knee joint kinematics. The purpose of this study was to compare utilization of these different established principles. Ten human cadaveric knee specimens were used to measure the kinematics during a weight-bearing flexion in a 6-degrees-of-freedom knee simulator. While flexing the knee, joint quadriceps muscle forces were dynamically simulated to reach a vertical ground reaction force of 100N. Fourteen knee specimens were mounted in 6-degrees-of-freedom robotic manipulator with a universal force sensor. The unloaded flexing motion of each specimen was measured by finding positions for each degree of flexion where all forces are minimal (passive path). The kinematic data of the knee-simulator and the robot concerning internal-external rotation, anterior-posterior translation, varus-valgus motion, and medial-lateral translation was examined. For all investigated degrees of freedom the kinematics of the robotic passive path differed from the loaded kinematics in the knee simulator. Simulated bodyweight as well as the examination method used has a substantial influence on joint kinematics during flexion which has to be considered when interpreting biomechanical studies as well as clinical tests. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3348690 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | PAGEPress Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33486902012-05-10 Differences in tibiofemoral kinematics between the unloaded robotic passive path and a weightbearing knee simulator Wünschel, Markus Leichtle, Ulf Lo, JiaHsuan Wülker, Nikolaus Müller, Otto Orthop Rev (Pavia) Article Cadaveric in vitro studies are essential to test hypotheses concerning surgical manipulations in the same individual. Robotic technologies as well as different knee-models have been developed to get an in-depth comprehension of knee joint kinematics. The purpose of this study was to compare utilization of these different established principles. Ten human cadaveric knee specimens were used to measure the kinematics during a weight-bearing flexion in a 6-degrees-of-freedom knee simulator. While flexing the knee, joint quadriceps muscle forces were dynamically simulated to reach a vertical ground reaction force of 100N. Fourteen knee specimens were mounted in 6-degrees-of-freedom robotic manipulator with a universal force sensor. The unloaded flexing motion of each specimen was measured by finding positions for each degree of flexion where all forces are minimal (passive path). The kinematic data of the knee-simulator and the robot concerning internal-external rotation, anterior-posterior translation, varus-valgus motion, and medial-lateral translation was examined. For all investigated degrees of freedom the kinematics of the robotic passive path differed from the loaded kinematics in the knee simulator. Simulated bodyweight as well as the examination method used has a substantial influence on joint kinematics during flexion which has to be considered when interpreting biomechanical studies as well as clinical tests. PAGEPress Publications 2012-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3348690/ /pubmed/22577503 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2012.e2 Text en ©Copyright M. Wünschel et al., 2012 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Licensee PAGEPress, Italy |
spellingShingle | Article Wünschel, Markus Leichtle, Ulf Lo, JiaHsuan Wülker, Nikolaus Müller, Otto Differences in tibiofemoral kinematics between the unloaded robotic passive path and a weightbearing knee simulator |
title | Differences in tibiofemoral kinematics between the unloaded robotic passive path and a weightbearing knee simulator |
title_full | Differences in tibiofemoral kinematics between the unloaded robotic passive path and a weightbearing knee simulator |
title_fullStr | Differences in tibiofemoral kinematics between the unloaded robotic passive path and a weightbearing knee simulator |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in tibiofemoral kinematics between the unloaded robotic passive path and a weightbearing knee simulator |
title_short | Differences in tibiofemoral kinematics between the unloaded robotic passive path and a weightbearing knee simulator |
title_sort | differences in tibiofemoral kinematics between the unloaded robotic passive path and a weightbearing knee simulator |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3348690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22577503 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2012.e2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wunschelmarkus differencesintibiofemoralkinematicsbetweentheunloadedroboticpassivepathandaweightbearingkneesimulator AT leichtleulf differencesintibiofemoralkinematicsbetweentheunloadedroboticpassivepathandaweightbearingkneesimulator AT lojiahsuan differencesintibiofemoralkinematicsbetweentheunloadedroboticpassivepathandaweightbearingkneesimulator AT wulkernikolaus differencesintibiofemoralkinematicsbetweentheunloadedroboticpassivepathandaweightbearingkneesimulator AT mullerotto differencesintibiofemoralkinematicsbetweentheunloadedroboticpassivepathandaweightbearingkneesimulator |