Cargando…
Comparison of Three Methods for the Estimation of Pineal Gland Volume Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Pineal gland is a very important neuroendocrine organ with many physiological functions such as regulating circadian rhythm. Radiologically, the pineal gland volume is clinically important because it is usually difficult to distinguish small pineal tumors via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Althou...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Scientific World Journal
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3349090/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22619577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/123412 |
_version_ | 1782232462136442880 |
---|---|
author | Acer, Niyazi Ilıca, Ahmet Turan Turgut, Ahmet Tuncay Özçelik, Özlem Yıldırım, Birdal Turgut, Mehmet |
author_facet | Acer, Niyazi Ilıca, Ahmet Turan Turgut, Ahmet Tuncay Özçelik, Özlem Yıldırım, Birdal Turgut, Mehmet |
author_sort | Acer, Niyazi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pineal gland is a very important neuroendocrine organ with many physiological functions such as regulating circadian rhythm. Radiologically, the pineal gland volume is clinically important because it is usually difficult to distinguish small pineal tumors via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Although many studies have estimated the pineal gland volume using different techniques, to the best of our knowledge, there has so far been no stereological work done on this subject. The objective of the current paper was to determine the pineal gland volume using stereological methods and by the region of interest (ROI) on MRI. In this paper, the pineal gland volumes were calculated in a total of 62 subjects (36 females, 26 males) who were free of any pineal lesions or tumors. The mean ± SD pineal gland volumes of the point-counting, planimetry, and ROI groups were 99.55 ± 51.34, 102.69 ± 40.39, and 104.33 ± 40.45 mm(3), respectively. No significant difference was found among the methods of calculating pineal gland volume (P > 0.05). From these results, it can be concluded that each technique is an unbiased, efficient, and reliable method, ideally suitable for in vivo examination of MRI data for pineal gland volume estimation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3349090 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | The Scientific World Journal |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33490902012-05-22 Comparison of Three Methods for the Estimation of Pineal Gland Volume Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Acer, Niyazi Ilıca, Ahmet Turan Turgut, Ahmet Tuncay Özçelik, Özlem Yıldırım, Birdal Turgut, Mehmet ScientificWorldJournal Research Article Pineal gland is a very important neuroendocrine organ with many physiological functions such as regulating circadian rhythm. Radiologically, the pineal gland volume is clinically important because it is usually difficult to distinguish small pineal tumors via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Although many studies have estimated the pineal gland volume using different techniques, to the best of our knowledge, there has so far been no stereological work done on this subject. The objective of the current paper was to determine the pineal gland volume using stereological methods and by the region of interest (ROI) on MRI. In this paper, the pineal gland volumes were calculated in a total of 62 subjects (36 females, 26 males) who were free of any pineal lesions or tumors. The mean ± SD pineal gland volumes of the point-counting, planimetry, and ROI groups were 99.55 ± 51.34, 102.69 ± 40.39, and 104.33 ± 40.45 mm(3), respectively. No significant difference was found among the methods of calculating pineal gland volume (P > 0.05). From these results, it can be concluded that each technique is an unbiased, efficient, and reliable method, ideally suitable for in vivo examination of MRI data for pineal gland volume estimation. The Scientific World Journal 2012-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3349090/ /pubmed/22619577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/123412 Text en Copyright © 2012 Niyazi Acer et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Acer, Niyazi Ilıca, Ahmet Turan Turgut, Ahmet Tuncay Özçelik, Özlem Yıldırım, Birdal Turgut, Mehmet Comparison of Three Methods for the Estimation of Pineal Gland Volume Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title | Comparison of Three Methods for the Estimation of Pineal Gland Volume Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title_full | Comparison of Three Methods for the Estimation of Pineal Gland Volume Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Three Methods for the Estimation of Pineal Gland Volume Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Three Methods for the Estimation of Pineal Gland Volume Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title_short | Comparison of Three Methods for the Estimation of Pineal Gland Volume Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title_sort | comparison of three methods for the estimation of pineal gland volume using magnetic resonance imaging |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3349090/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22619577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/123412 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT acerniyazi comparisonofthreemethodsfortheestimationofpinealglandvolumeusingmagneticresonanceimaging AT ilıcaahmetturan comparisonofthreemethodsfortheestimationofpinealglandvolumeusingmagneticresonanceimaging AT turgutahmettuncay comparisonofthreemethodsfortheestimationofpinealglandvolumeusingmagneticresonanceimaging AT ozcelikozlem comparisonofthreemethodsfortheestimationofpinealglandvolumeusingmagneticresonanceimaging AT yıldırımbirdal comparisonofthreemethodsfortheestimationofpinealglandvolumeusingmagneticresonanceimaging AT turgutmehmet comparisonofthreemethodsfortheestimationofpinealglandvolumeusingmagneticresonanceimaging |