Cargando…

Comparison of Three Methods for the Estimation of Pineal Gland Volume Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Pineal gland is a very important neuroendocrine organ with many physiological functions such as regulating circadian rhythm. Radiologically, the pineal gland volume is clinically important because it is usually difficult to distinguish small pineal tumors via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Althou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Acer, Niyazi, Ilıca, Ahmet Turan, Turgut, Ahmet Tuncay, Özçelik, Özlem, Yıldırım, Birdal, Turgut, Mehmet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Scientific World Journal 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3349090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22619577
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/123412
_version_ 1782232462136442880
author Acer, Niyazi
Ilıca, Ahmet Turan
Turgut, Ahmet Tuncay
Özçelik, Özlem
Yıldırım, Birdal
Turgut, Mehmet
author_facet Acer, Niyazi
Ilıca, Ahmet Turan
Turgut, Ahmet Tuncay
Özçelik, Özlem
Yıldırım, Birdal
Turgut, Mehmet
author_sort Acer, Niyazi
collection PubMed
description Pineal gland is a very important neuroendocrine organ with many physiological functions such as regulating circadian rhythm. Radiologically, the pineal gland volume is clinically important because it is usually difficult to distinguish small pineal tumors via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Although many studies have estimated the pineal gland volume using different techniques, to the best of our knowledge, there has so far been no stereological work done on this subject. The objective of the current paper was to determine the pineal gland volume using stereological methods and by the region of interest (ROI) on MRI. In this paper, the pineal gland volumes were calculated in a total of 62 subjects (36 females, 26 males) who were free of any pineal lesions or tumors. The mean ± SD pineal gland volumes of the point-counting, planimetry, and ROI groups were 99.55 ± 51.34, 102.69 ± 40.39, and 104.33 ± 40.45 mm(3), respectively. No significant difference was found among the methods of calculating pineal gland volume (P > 0.05). From these results, it can be concluded that each technique is an unbiased, efficient, and reliable method, ideally suitable for in vivo examination of MRI data for pineal gland volume estimation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3349090
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher The Scientific World Journal
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33490902012-05-22 Comparison of Three Methods for the Estimation of Pineal Gland Volume Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Acer, Niyazi Ilıca, Ahmet Turan Turgut, Ahmet Tuncay Özçelik, Özlem Yıldırım, Birdal Turgut, Mehmet ScientificWorldJournal Research Article Pineal gland is a very important neuroendocrine organ with many physiological functions such as regulating circadian rhythm. Radiologically, the pineal gland volume is clinically important because it is usually difficult to distinguish small pineal tumors via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Although many studies have estimated the pineal gland volume using different techniques, to the best of our knowledge, there has so far been no stereological work done on this subject. The objective of the current paper was to determine the pineal gland volume using stereological methods and by the region of interest (ROI) on MRI. In this paper, the pineal gland volumes were calculated in a total of 62 subjects (36 females, 26 males) who were free of any pineal lesions or tumors. The mean ± SD pineal gland volumes of the point-counting, planimetry, and ROI groups were 99.55 ± 51.34, 102.69 ± 40.39, and 104.33 ± 40.45 mm(3), respectively. No significant difference was found among the methods of calculating pineal gland volume (P > 0.05). From these results, it can be concluded that each technique is an unbiased, efficient, and reliable method, ideally suitable for in vivo examination of MRI data for pineal gland volume estimation. The Scientific World Journal 2012-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3349090/ /pubmed/22619577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/123412 Text en Copyright © 2012 Niyazi Acer et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Acer, Niyazi
Ilıca, Ahmet Turan
Turgut, Ahmet Tuncay
Özçelik, Özlem
Yıldırım, Birdal
Turgut, Mehmet
Comparison of Three Methods for the Estimation of Pineal Gland Volume Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title Comparison of Three Methods for the Estimation of Pineal Gland Volume Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full Comparison of Three Methods for the Estimation of Pineal Gland Volume Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_fullStr Comparison of Three Methods for the Estimation of Pineal Gland Volume Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Three Methods for the Estimation of Pineal Gland Volume Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_short Comparison of Three Methods for the Estimation of Pineal Gland Volume Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_sort comparison of three methods for the estimation of pineal gland volume using magnetic resonance imaging
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3349090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22619577
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/123412
work_keys_str_mv AT acerniyazi comparisonofthreemethodsfortheestimationofpinealglandvolumeusingmagneticresonanceimaging
AT ilıcaahmetturan comparisonofthreemethodsfortheestimationofpinealglandvolumeusingmagneticresonanceimaging
AT turgutahmettuncay comparisonofthreemethodsfortheestimationofpinealglandvolumeusingmagneticresonanceimaging
AT ozcelikozlem comparisonofthreemethodsfortheestimationofpinealglandvolumeusingmagneticresonanceimaging
AT yıldırımbirdal comparisonofthreemethodsfortheestimationofpinealglandvolumeusingmagneticresonanceimaging
AT turgutmehmet comparisonofthreemethodsfortheestimationofpinealglandvolumeusingmagneticresonanceimaging