Cargando…

Critical Comparison between Modified Monier-Williams and Electrochemical Methods to Determine Sulfite in Aqueous Solutions

In the present work, known concentration of sulfite aqueous solutions in the presence and absence of gallic acid was measured to corroborate the validity of modified Monier-Williams method. Free and bound-sulfite was estimated by differential pulse voltammetry. To our surprise, the modified Monier-W...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Montes, C., Vélez, J. H., Ramírez, G., Isaacs, M., Arce, R., Aguirre, M. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Scientific World Journal 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3349111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22619610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/168148
_version_ 1782232467001835520
author Montes, C.
Vélez, J. H.
Ramírez, G.
Isaacs, M.
Arce, R.
Aguirre, M. J.
author_facet Montes, C.
Vélez, J. H.
Ramírez, G.
Isaacs, M.
Arce, R.
Aguirre, M. J.
author_sort Montes, C.
collection PubMed
description In the present work, known concentration of sulfite aqueous solutions in the presence and absence of gallic acid was measured to corroborate the validity of modified Monier-Williams method. Free and bound-sulfite was estimated by differential pulse voltammetry. To our surprise, the modified Monier-Williams method (also known as aspiration method) showed to be very inaccurate for free-sulfite, although suitable for bound-sulfite determination. The differential pulse approach, using the standard addition method and a correction coefficient, proved to be swift, cheap, and very precise and accurate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3349111
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher The Scientific World Journal
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33491112012-05-22 Critical Comparison between Modified Monier-Williams and Electrochemical Methods to Determine Sulfite in Aqueous Solutions Montes, C. Vélez, J. H. Ramírez, G. Isaacs, M. Arce, R. Aguirre, M. J. ScientificWorldJournal Research Article In the present work, known concentration of sulfite aqueous solutions in the presence and absence of gallic acid was measured to corroborate the validity of modified Monier-Williams method. Free and bound-sulfite was estimated by differential pulse voltammetry. To our surprise, the modified Monier-Williams method (also known as aspiration method) showed to be very inaccurate for free-sulfite, although suitable for bound-sulfite determination. The differential pulse approach, using the standard addition method and a correction coefficient, proved to be swift, cheap, and very precise and accurate. The Scientific World Journal 2012-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3349111/ /pubmed/22619610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/168148 Text en Copyright © 2012 C. Montes et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Montes, C.
Vélez, J. H.
Ramírez, G.
Isaacs, M.
Arce, R.
Aguirre, M. J.
Critical Comparison between Modified Monier-Williams and Electrochemical Methods to Determine Sulfite in Aqueous Solutions
title Critical Comparison between Modified Monier-Williams and Electrochemical Methods to Determine Sulfite in Aqueous Solutions
title_full Critical Comparison between Modified Monier-Williams and Electrochemical Methods to Determine Sulfite in Aqueous Solutions
title_fullStr Critical Comparison between Modified Monier-Williams and Electrochemical Methods to Determine Sulfite in Aqueous Solutions
title_full_unstemmed Critical Comparison between Modified Monier-Williams and Electrochemical Methods to Determine Sulfite in Aqueous Solutions
title_short Critical Comparison between Modified Monier-Williams and Electrochemical Methods to Determine Sulfite in Aqueous Solutions
title_sort critical comparison between modified monier-williams and electrochemical methods to determine sulfite in aqueous solutions
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3349111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22619610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/168148
work_keys_str_mv AT montesc criticalcomparisonbetweenmodifiedmonierwilliamsandelectrochemicalmethodstodeterminesulfiteinaqueoussolutions
AT velezjh criticalcomparisonbetweenmodifiedmonierwilliamsandelectrochemicalmethodstodeterminesulfiteinaqueoussolutions
AT ramirezg criticalcomparisonbetweenmodifiedmonierwilliamsandelectrochemicalmethodstodeterminesulfiteinaqueoussolutions
AT isaacsm criticalcomparisonbetweenmodifiedmonierwilliamsandelectrochemicalmethodstodeterminesulfiteinaqueoussolutions
AT arcer criticalcomparisonbetweenmodifiedmonierwilliamsandelectrochemicalmethodstodeterminesulfiteinaqueoussolutions
AT aguirremj criticalcomparisonbetweenmodifiedmonierwilliamsandelectrochemicalmethodstodeterminesulfiteinaqueoussolutions