Cargando…

Antioxidants for Preventing Preeclampsia: A Systematic Review

Objective. To investigate the efficacy of antioxidants for preventing preeclampsia and other maternal and fetal complications among pregnant women with low, moderate, or high risk of preeclampsia. Methods. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, mRCT, and other databases, with no language or publicati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salles, Adriana Magalhaes Ribeiro, Galvao, Tais Freire, Silva, Marcus Tolentino, Motta, Lucilia Casulari Domingues, Pereira, Mauricio Gomes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Scientific World Journal 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3349130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22593668
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/243476
_version_ 1782232471256956928
author Salles, Adriana Magalhaes Ribeiro
Galvao, Tais Freire
Silva, Marcus Tolentino
Motta, Lucilia Casulari Domingues
Pereira, Mauricio Gomes
author_facet Salles, Adriana Magalhaes Ribeiro
Galvao, Tais Freire
Silva, Marcus Tolentino
Motta, Lucilia Casulari Domingues
Pereira, Mauricio Gomes
author_sort Salles, Adriana Magalhaes Ribeiro
collection PubMed
description Objective. To investigate the efficacy of antioxidants for preventing preeclampsia and other maternal and fetal complications among pregnant women with low, moderate, or high risk of preeclampsia. Methods. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, mRCT, and other databases, with no language or publication restrictions. Two independent reviewers selected randomized controlled trials that evaluated the use of antioxidants versus placebo and extracted the relevant data. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated. The data were compiled through the random effects model. Main Results. Fifteen studies were included (21,012 women and 21,647 fetuses). No statistically significant difference was found between women who received antioxidant treatment and women who received placebo for preeclampsia (RR  = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.82–1.04), severe preeclampsia (RR  = 1.03; 95% CI: 0.87–1.22), preterm birth (RR  = 1.03; 95% CI: 0.94–1.14), and small for gestational age <10th centile (RR  = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.80–1.05). Side effects were numerically more frequent in the antioxidants group compared to placebo, but without significant statistical difference (RR  = 1.24; 95% CI: 0.85–1.80). Conclusions. The available evidence reviewed does not support the use of antioxidants during pregnancy for the prevention of preeclampsia and other outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3349130
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher The Scientific World Journal
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33491302012-05-16 Antioxidants for Preventing Preeclampsia: A Systematic Review Salles, Adriana Magalhaes Ribeiro Galvao, Tais Freire Silva, Marcus Tolentino Motta, Lucilia Casulari Domingues Pereira, Mauricio Gomes ScientificWorldJournal Research Article Objective. To investigate the efficacy of antioxidants for preventing preeclampsia and other maternal and fetal complications among pregnant women with low, moderate, or high risk of preeclampsia. Methods. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, mRCT, and other databases, with no language or publication restrictions. Two independent reviewers selected randomized controlled trials that evaluated the use of antioxidants versus placebo and extracted the relevant data. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated. The data were compiled through the random effects model. Main Results. Fifteen studies were included (21,012 women and 21,647 fetuses). No statistically significant difference was found between women who received antioxidant treatment and women who received placebo for preeclampsia (RR  = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.82–1.04), severe preeclampsia (RR  = 1.03; 95% CI: 0.87–1.22), preterm birth (RR  = 1.03; 95% CI: 0.94–1.14), and small for gestational age <10th centile (RR  = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.80–1.05). Side effects were numerically more frequent in the antioxidants group compared to placebo, but without significant statistical difference (RR  = 1.24; 95% CI: 0.85–1.80). Conclusions. The available evidence reviewed does not support the use of antioxidants during pregnancy for the prevention of preeclampsia and other outcomes. The Scientific World Journal 2012-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3349130/ /pubmed/22593668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/243476 Text en Copyright © 2012 Adriana Magalhaes Ribeiro Salles et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Salles, Adriana Magalhaes Ribeiro
Galvao, Tais Freire
Silva, Marcus Tolentino
Motta, Lucilia Casulari Domingues
Pereira, Mauricio Gomes
Antioxidants for Preventing Preeclampsia: A Systematic Review
title Antioxidants for Preventing Preeclampsia: A Systematic Review
title_full Antioxidants for Preventing Preeclampsia: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Antioxidants for Preventing Preeclampsia: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Antioxidants for Preventing Preeclampsia: A Systematic Review
title_short Antioxidants for Preventing Preeclampsia: A Systematic Review
title_sort antioxidants for preventing preeclampsia: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3349130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22593668
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/243476
work_keys_str_mv AT sallesadrianamagalhaesribeiro antioxidantsforpreventingpreeclampsiaasystematicreview
AT galvaotaisfreire antioxidantsforpreventingpreeclampsiaasystematicreview
AT silvamarcustolentino antioxidantsforpreventingpreeclampsiaasystematicreview
AT mottaluciliacasularidomingues antioxidantsforpreventingpreeclampsiaasystematicreview
AT pereiramauriciogomes antioxidantsforpreventingpreeclampsiaasystematicreview