Cargando…

Griffing's Methods Comparison for General and Specific Combining Ability in Cucumber

A comparison among two forms of half-diallel analysis was made. The different half-diallel techniques used were Griffing's model I, method 2 and 4. These methods of diallel analysis were found to be interrelated. However, as Griffing's model I, method 4 partitioned heterosis into different...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olfati, J. A., Samizadeh, H., Rabiei, B., Peyvast, Gh.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Scientific World Journal 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3349209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22593691
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/524873
_version_ 1782232485944360960
author Olfati, J. A.
Samizadeh, H.
Rabiei, B.
Peyvast, Gh.
author_facet Olfati, J. A.
Samizadeh, H.
Rabiei, B.
Peyvast, Gh.
author_sort Olfati, J. A.
collection PubMed
description A comparison among two forms of half-diallel analysis was made. The different half-diallel techniques used were Griffing's model I, method 2 and 4. These methods of diallel analysis were found to be interrelated. However, as Griffing's model I, method 4 partitioned heterosis into different components as well as gave information about combining ability and this method had certainly some advantages over the other. The results further indicated using parental generations in the second Griffing method may cause biased estimate of the GCA and SCA variances. Thus, using the fourth Griffing method is more suitable than the other methods in providing time, cost, and facilities, and it is recommended as an applicable method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3349209
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher The Scientific World Journal
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33492092012-05-16 Griffing's Methods Comparison for General and Specific Combining Ability in Cucumber Olfati, J. A. Samizadeh, H. Rabiei, B. Peyvast, Gh. ScientificWorldJournal Research Article A comparison among two forms of half-diallel analysis was made. The different half-diallel techniques used were Griffing's model I, method 2 and 4. These methods of diallel analysis were found to be interrelated. However, as Griffing's model I, method 4 partitioned heterosis into different components as well as gave information about combining ability and this method had certainly some advantages over the other. The results further indicated using parental generations in the second Griffing method may cause biased estimate of the GCA and SCA variances. Thus, using the fourth Griffing method is more suitable than the other methods in providing time, cost, and facilities, and it is recommended as an applicable method. The Scientific World Journal 2012-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3349209/ /pubmed/22593691 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/524873 Text en Copyright © 2012 J. A. Olfati et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Olfati, J. A.
Samizadeh, H.
Rabiei, B.
Peyvast, Gh.
Griffing's Methods Comparison for General and Specific Combining Ability in Cucumber
title Griffing's Methods Comparison for General and Specific Combining Ability in Cucumber
title_full Griffing's Methods Comparison for General and Specific Combining Ability in Cucumber
title_fullStr Griffing's Methods Comparison for General and Specific Combining Ability in Cucumber
title_full_unstemmed Griffing's Methods Comparison for General and Specific Combining Ability in Cucumber
title_short Griffing's Methods Comparison for General and Specific Combining Ability in Cucumber
title_sort griffing's methods comparison for general and specific combining ability in cucumber
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3349209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22593691
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/524873
work_keys_str_mv AT olfatija griffingsmethodscomparisonforgeneralandspecificcombiningabilityincucumber
AT samizadehh griffingsmethodscomparisonforgeneralandspecificcombiningabilityincucumber
AT rabieib griffingsmethodscomparisonforgeneralandspecificcombiningabilityincucumber
AT peyvastgh griffingsmethodscomparisonforgeneralandspecificcombiningabilityincucumber