Cargando…

The contribution of the two hemispheres to lexical decision in different languages

BACKGROUND: Both reading words and text in Arabic is slower than in other languages, even among skilled native Arabic speakers Previously we have shown that the right hemisphere (RH) had difficulty in matching Arabic letters, and suggested that it cannot contribute to word recognition in Arabic. In...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ibrahim, Raphiq, Eviatar, Zohar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3349568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22230362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-8-3
_version_ 1782232525661274112
author Ibrahim, Raphiq
Eviatar, Zohar
author_facet Ibrahim, Raphiq
Eviatar, Zohar
author_sort Ibrahim, Raphiq
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Both reading words and text in Arabic is slower than in other languages, even among skilled native Arabic speakers Previously we have shown that the right hemisphere (RH) had difficulty in matching Arabic letters, and suggested that it cannot contribute to word recognition in Arabic. In this study we tested this finding directly. METHOD: We used the Divided Visual Field (DVF) lexical decision (LD) paradigm to assess hemispheric function during reading. The experiment had two conditions (unilateral and bilateral). In the unilateral condition, the target stimulus was presented unilaterally to the left or the right visual field. In the bilateral condition two stimuli were presented simultaneously, and participants were cued as to which one was the target. Three groups of participants were tested: Arabic speakers, Hebrew speakers, and English speakers. Each group was tested in their native language. RESULTS: For Hebrew and English speakers, performance in both visual fields was significantly better in the unilateral than in the bilateral condition. For Arabic speakers, performance in the right visual field (RVF, where stimuli are presented directly to the left hemisphere) did not change in the two conditions. Performance in the LVF (when stimuli are presented directly to the right hemisphere) was at chance level in the bilateral condition, but not in the unilateral condition. CONCLUSION: We interpret these data as supporting the hypothesis that in English and Hebrew, both hemispheres are involved in LD, whereas in Arabic, the right hemisphere is not involved in word recognition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3349568
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33495682012-05-11 The contribution of the two hemispheres to lexical decision in different languages Ibrahim, Raphiq Eviatar, Zohar Behav Brain Funct Short Paper BACKGROUND: Both reading words and text in Arabic is slower than in other languages, even among skilled native Arabic speakers Previously we have shown that the right hemisphere (RH) had difficulty in matching Arabic letters, and suggested that it cannot contribute to word recognition in Arabic. In this study we tested this finding directly. METHOD: We used the Divided Visual Field (DVF) lexical decision (LD) paradigm to assess hemispheric function during reading. The experiment had two conditions (unilateral and bilateral). In the unilateral condition, the target stimulus was presented unilaterally to the left or the right visual field. In the bilateral condition two stimuli were presented simultaneously, and participants were cued as to which one was the target. Three groups of participants were tested: Arabic speakers, Hebrew speakers, and English speakers. Each group was tested in their native language. RESULTS: For Hebrew and English speakers, performance in both visual fields was significantly better in the unilateral than in the bilateral condition. For Arabic speakers, performance in the right visual field (RVF, where stimuli are presented directly to the left hemisphere) did not change in the two conditions. Performance in the LVF (when stimuli are presented directly to the right hemisphere) was at chance level in the bilateral condition, but not in the unilateral condition. CONCLUSION: We interpret these data as supporting the hypothesis that in English and Hebrew, both hemispheres are involved in LD, whereas in Arabic, the right hemisphere is not involved in word recognition. BioMed Central 2012-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3349568/ /pubmed/22230362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-8-3 Text en Copyright ©2012 Ibrahim and Eviatar; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Paper
Ibrahim, Raphiq
Eviatar, Zohar
The contribution of the two hemispheres to lexical decision in different languages
title The contribution of the two hemispheres to lexical decision in different languages
title_full The contribution of the two hemispheres to lexical decision in different languages
title_fullStr The contribution of the two hemispheres to lexical decision in different languages
title_full_unstemmed The contribution of the two hemispheres to lexical decision in different languages
title_short The contribution of the two hemispheres to lexical decision in different languages
title_sort contribution of the two hemispheres to lexical decision in different languages
topic Short Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3349568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22230362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-8-3
work_keys_str_mv AT ibrahimraphiq thecontributionofthetwohemispherestolexicaldecisionindifferentlanguages
AT eviatarzohar thecontributionofthetwohemispherestolexicaldecisionindifferentlanguages
AT ibrahimraphiq contributionofthetwohemispherestolexicaldecisionindifferentlanguages
AT eviatarzohar contributionofthetwohemispherestolexicaldecisionindifferentlanguages