Cargando…

Evaluation of Lay Support in Pregnant women with Social risk (ELSIPS): a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Maternal, neonatal and child health outcomes are worse in families from black and ethnic minority groups and disadvantaged backgrounds. There is little evidence on whether lay support improves maternal and infant outcomes among women with complex social needs within a disadvantaged multi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kenyon, Sara, Jolly, Kate, Hemming, Karla, Ingram, Lucy, Gale, Nicola, Dann, Sophie-Anna, Chambers, Jacky, MacArthur, Christine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3349581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22375895
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-12-11
_version_ 1782232528643424256
author Kenyon, Sara
Jolly, Kate
Hemming, Karla
Ingram, Lucy
Gale, Nicola
Dann, Sophie-Anna
Chambers, Jacky
MacArthur, Christine
author_facet Kenyon, Sara
Jolly, Kate
Hemming, Karla
Ingram, Lucy
Gale, Nicola
Dann, Sophie-Anna
Chambers, Jacky
MacArthur, Christine
author_sort Kenyon, Sara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Maternal, neonatal and child health outcomes are worse in families from black and ethnic minority groups and disadvantaged backgrounds. There is little evidence on whether lay support improves maternal and infant outcomes among women with complex social needs within a disadvantaged multi-ethnic population in the United Kingdom (UK). METHOD/DESIGN: The aim of this study is to evaluate a lay Pregnancy Outreach Worker (POW) service for nulliparous women identified as having social risk within a maternity service that is systematically assessing social risks alongside the usual obstetric and medical risks. The study design is a randomised controlled trial (RCT) in nulliparous women assessed as having social risk comparing standard maternity care with the addition of referral to the POW support service. The POWs work alongside community midwifery teams and offer individualised support to women to encourage engagement with services (health and social care) from randomisation (before 28 weeks gestation) until 6 weeks after birth. The primary outcomes have been chosen on the basis that they are linked to maternal and infant health. The two primary outcomes are engagement with antenatal care, assessed by the number of antenatal visits; and maternal depression, assessed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale at 8-12 weeks after birth. Secondary outcomes include maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality, routine child health assessments, including immunisation uptake and breastfeeding at 6 weeks. Other psychological outcomes (self efficacy) and mother-to-infant bonding will also be collected using validated tools. A sample size of 1316 will provide 90% power (at the 5% significance level) to detect increased engagement with antenatal services of 1.5 visits and a reduction of 1.5 in the average EPDS score for women with two or more social risk factors, with power in excess of this for women with any social risk factor. Analysis will be by intention to treat. Qualitative research will explore the POWs' daily work in context. This will complement the findings of the RCT through a triangulation of quantitative and qualitative data on the process of the intervention, and identify other contextual factors that affect the implementation of the intervention. DISCUSSION: The trial will provide high quality evidence as to whether or not lay support (POW) offered to women identified with social risk factors improves engagement with maternity services and reduces numbers of women with depression. MREC NUMBER: 10/H1207/23 TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN: ISRCTN35027323
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3349581
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33495812012-05-11 Evaluation of Lay Support in Pregnant women with Social risk (ELSIPS): a randomised controlled trial Kenyon, Sara Jolly, Kate Hemming, Karla Ingram, Lucy Gale, Nicola Dann, Sophie-Anna Chambers, Jacky MacArthur, Christine BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Maternal, neonatal and child health outcomes are worse in families from black and ethnic minority groups and disadvantaged backgrounds. There is little evidence on whether lay support improves maternal and infant outcomes among women with complex social needs within a disadvantaged multi-ethnic population in the United Kingdom (UK). METHOD/DESIGN: The aim of this study is to evaluate a lay Pregnancy Outreach Worker (POW) service for nulliparous women identified as having social risk within a maternity service that is systematically assessing social risks alongside the usual obstetric and medical risks. The study design is a randomised controlled trial (RCT) in nulliparous women assessed as having social risk comparing standard maternity care with the addition of referral to the POW support service. The POWs work alongside community midwifery teams and offer individualised support to women to encourage engagement with services (health and social care) from randomisation (before 28 weeks gestation) until 6 weeks after birth. The primary outcomes have been chosen on the basis that they are linked to maternal and infant health. The two primary outcomes are engagement with antenatal care, assessed by the number of antenatal visits; and maternal depression, assessed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale at 8-12 weeks after birth. Secondary outcomes include maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality, routine child health assessments, including immunisation uptake and breastfeeding at 6 weeks. Other psychological outcomes (self efficacy) and mother-to-infant bonding will also be collected using validated tools. A sample size of 1316 will provide 90% power (at the 5% significance level) to detect increased engagement with antenatal services of 1.5 visits and a reduction of 1.5 in the average EPDS score for women with two or more social risk factors, with power in excess of this for women with any social risk factor. Analysis will be by intention to treat. Qualitative research will explore the POWs' daily work in context. This will complement the findings of the RCT through a triangulation of quantitative and qualitative data on the process of the intervention, and identify other contextual factors that affect the implementation of the intervention. DISCUSSION: The trial will provide high quality evidence as to whether or not lay support (POW) offered to women identified with social risk factors improves engagement with maternity services and reduces numbers of women with depression. MREC NUMBER: 10/H1207/23 TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN: ISRCTN35027323 BioMed Central 2012-02-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3349581/ /pubmed/22375895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-12-11 Text en Copyright ©2012 Kenyon et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Kenyon, Sara
Jolly, Kate
Hemming, Karla
Ingram, Lucy
Gale, Nicola
Dann, Sophie-Anna
Chambers, Jacky
MacArthur, Christine
Evaluation of Lay Support in Pregnant women with Social risk (ELSIPS): a randomised controlled trial
title Evaluation of Lay Support in Pregnant women with Social risk (ELSIPS): a randomised controlled trial
title_full Evaluation of Lay Support in Pregnant women with Social risk (ELSIPS): a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Evaluation of Lay Support in Pregnant women with Social risk (ELSIPS): a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Lay Support in Pregnant women with Social risk (ELSIPS): a randomised controlled trial
title_short Evaluation of Lay Support in Pregnant women with Social risk (ELSIPS): a randomised controlled trial
title_sort evaluation of lay support in pregnant women with social risk (elsips): a randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3349581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22375895
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-12-11
work_keys_str_mv AT kenyonsara evaluationoflaysupportinpregnantwomenwithsocialriskelsipsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT jollykate evaluationoflaysupportinpregnantwomenwithsocialriskelsipsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hemmingkarla evaluationoflaysupportinpregnantwomenwithsocialriskelsipsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ingramlucy evaluationoflaysupportinpregnantwomenwithsocialriskelsipsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT galenicola evaluationoflaysupportinpregnantwomenwithsocialriskelsipsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT dannsophieanna evaluationoflaysupportinpregnantwomenwithsocialriskelsipsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT chambersjacky evaluationoflaysupportinpregnantwomenwithsocialriskelsipsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT macarthurchristine evaluationoflaysupportinpregnantwomenwithsocialriskelsipsarandomisedcontrolledtrial