Cargando…

SNOntology: Myriads of novel snornas or just a mirage?

BACKGROUND: Small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) are a large group of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) that mainly guide 2'-O-methylation (C/D RNAs) and pseudouridylation (H/ACA RNAs) of ribosomal RNAs. The pattern of rRNA modifications and the set of snoRNAs that guide these modifications are conserved in v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Makarova, Julia A, Kramerov, Dmitri A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3349704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22047601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-543
_version_ 1782232549029838848
author Makarova, Julia A
Kramerov, Dmitri A
author_facet Makarova, Julia A
Kramerov, Dmitri A
author_sort Makarova, Julia A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) are a large group of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) that mainly guide 2'-O-methylation (C/D RNAs) and pseudouridylation (H/ACA RNAs) of ribosomal RNAs. The pattern of rRNA modifications and the set of snoRNAs that guide these modifications are conserved in vertebrates. Nearly all snoRNA genes in vertebrates are localized in introns of other genes and are processed from pre-mRNAs. Thus, the same promoter is used for the transcription of snoRNAs and host genes. RESULTS: The series of studies by Dahai Zhu and coworkers on snoRNAs and their genes were critically considered. We present evidence that dozens of species-specific snoRNAs that they described in vertebrates are experimental artifacts resulting from the improper use of Northern hybridization. The snoRNA genes with putative intrinsic promoters that were supposed to be transcribed independently proved to contain numerous substitutions and are, most likely, pseudogenes. In some cases, they are localized within introns of overlooked host genes. Finally, an increased number of snoRNA genes in mammalian genomes described by Zhu and coworkers is also an artifact resulting from two mistakes. First, numerous mammalian snoRNA pseudogenes were considered as genes, whereas most of them are localized outside of host genes and contain substitutions that question their functionality. Second, Zhu and coworkers failed to identify many snoRNA genes in non-mammalian species. As an illustration, we present 1352 C/D snoRNA genes that we have identified and annotated in vertebrates. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that conclusions based only on databases with automatically annotated ncRNAs can be erroneous. Special investigations aimed to distinguish true RNA genes from their pseudogenes should be done. Zhu and coworkers, as well as most other groups studying vertebrate snoRNAs, give new names to newly described homologs of human snoRNAs, which significantly complicates comparison between different species. It seems necessary to develop a uniform nomenclature for homologs of human snoRNAs in other vertebrates, e.g., human gene names prefixed with several-letter code denoting the vertebrate species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3349704
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33497042012-05-11 SNOntology: Myriads of novel snornas or just a mirage? Makarova, Julia A Kramerov, Dmitri A BMC Genomics Correspondence BACKGROUND: Small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) are a large group of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) that mainly guide 2'-O-methylation (C/D RNAs) and pseudouridylation (H/ACA RNAs) of ribosomal RNAs. The pattern of rRNA modifications and the set of snoRNAs that guide these modifications are conserved in vertebrates. Nearly all snoRNA genes in vertebrates are localized in introns of other genes and are processed from pre-mRNAs. Thus, the same promoter is used for the transcription of snoRNAs and host genes. RESULTS: The series of studies by Dahai Zhu and coworkers on snoRNAs and their genes were critically considered. We present evidence that dozens of species-specific snoRNAs that they described in vertebrates are experimental artifacts resulting from the improper use of Northern hybridization. The snoRNA genes with putative intrinsic promoters that were supposed to be transcribed independently proved to contain numerous substitutions and are, most likely, pseudogenes. In some cases, they are localized within introns of overlooked host genes. Finally, an increased number of snoRNA genes in mammalian genomes described by Zhu and coworkers is also an artifact resulting from two mistakes. First, numerous mammalian snoRNA pseudogenes were considered as genes, whereas most of them are localized outside of host genes and contain substitutions that question their functionality. Second, Zhu and coworkers failed to identify many snoRNA genes in non-mammalian species. As an illustration, we present 1352 C/D snoRNA genes that we have identified and annotated in vertebrates. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that conclusions based only on databases with automatically annotated ncRNAs can be erroneous. Special investigations aimed to distinguish true RNA genes from their pseudogenes should be done. Zhu and coworkers, as well as most other groups studying vertebrate snoRNAs, give new names to newly described homologs of human snoRNAs, which significantly complicates comparison between different species. It seems necessary to develop a uniform nomenclature for homologs of human snoRNAs in other vertebrates, e.g., human gene names prefixed with several-letter code denoting the vertebrate species. BioMed Central 2011-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3349704/ /pubmed/22047601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-543 Text en Copyright ©2011 Makarova and Kramerov; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Correspondence
Makarova, Julia A
Kramerov, Dmitri A
SNOntology: Myriads of novel snornas or just a mirage?
title SNOntology: Myriads of novel snornas or just a mirage?
title_full SNOntology: Myriads of novel snornas or just a mirage?
title_fullStr SNOntology: Myriads of novel snornas or just a mirage?
title_full_unstemmed SNOntology: Myriads of novel snornas or just a mirage?
title_short SNOntology: Myriads of novel snornas or just a mirage?
title_sort snontology: myriads of novel snornas or just a mirage?
topic Correspondence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3349704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22047601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-543
work_keys_str_mv AT makarovajuliaa snontologymyriadsofnovelsnornasorjustamirage
AT kramerovdmitria snontologymyriadsofnovelsnornasorjustamirage