Cargando…

Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study

Objective To determine neonatal outcomes (perinatal mortality and special care unit admission) and maternal outcomes (mode of delivery, delivery complications) of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management. Design Retrospective cohort study using an unselected population databas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stock, Sarah J, Ferguson, Evelyn, Duffy, Andrew, Ford, Ian, Chalmers, James, Norman, Jane E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3349781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22577197
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e2838
_version_ 1782232563057688576
author Stock, Sarah J
Ferguson, Evelyn
Duffy, Andrew
Ford, Ian
Chalmers, James
Norman, Jane E
author_facet Stock, Sarah J
Ferguson, Evelyn
Duffy, Andrew
Ford, Ian
Chalmers, James
Norman, Jane E
author_sort Stock, Sarah J
collection PubMed
description Objective To determine neonatal outcomes (perinatal mortality and special care unit admission) and maternal outcomes (mode of delivery, delivery complications) of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management. Design Retrospective cohort study using an unselected population database. Setting Consultant and midwife led obstetric units in Scotland 1981-2007. Participants 1 271 549 women with singleton pregnancies of 37 weeks or more gestation. Interventions Outcomes of elective induction of labour (induction of labour with no recognised medical indication) at 37, 38, 39, 40, and 41 weeks’ gestation compared with those of expectant management (continuation of pregnancy to either spontaneous labour, induction of labour or caesarean section at a later gestation). Main outcome measures Extended perinatal mortality, mode of delivery, postpartum haemorrhage, obstetric anal sphincter injury, and admission to a neonatal or special care baby unit. Outcomes were adjusted for age at delivery, parity, year of birth, birth weight, deprivation category, and, where appropriate, mode of delivery. Results At each gestation between 37 and 41 completed weeks, elective induction of labour was associated with a decreased odds of perinatal mortality compared with expectant management (at 40 weeks’ gestation 0.08% (37/44 764) in the induction of labour group versus 0.18% (627/350 643) in the expectant management group; adjusted odds ratio 0.39, 99% confidence interval 0.24 to 0.63), without a reduction in the odds of spontaneous vertex delivery (at 40 weeks’ gestation 79.9% (35 775/44 778) in the induction of labour group versus 73.7% (258 665/350 791) in the expectant management group; adjusted odds ratio 1.26, 1.22 to 1.31). Admission to a neonatal unit was, however, increased in association with elective induction of labour at all gestations before 41 weeks (at 40 weeks’ gestation 8.0% (3605/44 778) in the induction of labour group compared with 7.3% (25 572/350 791) in the expectant management group; adjusted odds ratio 1.14, 1.09 to 1.20). Conclusion Although residual confounding may remain, our findings indicate that elective induction of labour at term gestation can reduce perinatal mortality in developed countries without increasing the risk of operative delivery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3349781
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33497812012-05-10 Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study Stock, Sarah J Ferguson, Evelyn Duffy, Andrew Ford, Ian Chalmers, James Norman, Jane E BMJ Research Objective To determine neonatal outcomes (perinatal mortality and special care unit admission) and maternal outcomes (mode of delivery, delivery complications) of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management. Design Retrospective cohort study using an unselected population database. Setting Consultant and midwife led obstetric units in Scotland 1981-2007. Participants 1 271 549 women with singleton pregnancies of 37 weeks or more gestation. Interventions Outcomes of elective induction of labour (induction of labour with no recognised medical indication) at 37, 38, 39, 40, and 41 weeks’ gestation compared with those of expectant management (continuation of pregnancy to either spontaneous labour, induction of labour or caesarean section at a later gestation). Main outcome measures Extended perinatal mortality, mode of delivery, postpartum haemorrhage, obstetric anal sphincter injury, and admission to a neonatal or special care baby unit. Outcomes were adjusted for age at delivery, parity, year of birth, birth weight, deprivation category, and, where appropriate, mode of delivery. Results At each gestation between 37 and 41 completed weeks, elective induction of labour was associated with a decreased odds of perinatal mortality compared with expectant management (at 40 weeks’ gestation 0.08% (37/44 764) in the induction of labour group versus 0.18% (627/350 643) in the expectant management group; adjusted odds ratio 0.39, 99% confidence interval 0.24 to 0.63), without a reduction in the odds of spontaneous vertex delivery (at 40 weeks’ gestation 79.9% (35 775/44 778) in the induction of labour group versus 73.7% (258 665/350 791) in the expectant management group; adjusted odds ratio 1.26, 1.22 to 1.31). Admission to a neonatal unit was, however, increased in association with elective induction of labour at all gestations before 41 weeks (at 40 weeks’ gestation 8.0% (3605/44 778) in the induction of labour group compared with 7.3% (25 572/350 791) in the expectant management group; adjusted odds ratio 1.14, 1.09 to 1.20). Conclusion Although residual confounding may remain, our findings indicate that elective induction of labour at term gestation can reduce perinatal mortality in developed countries without increasing the risk of operative delivery. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2012-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3349781/ /pubmed/22577197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e2838 Text en © Stock et al 2012 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Research
Stock, Sarah J
Ferguson, Evelyn
Duffy, Andrew
Ford, Ian
Chalmers, James
Norman, Jane E
Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study
title Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study
title_full Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study
title_fullStr Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study
title_short Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study
title_sort outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3349781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22577197
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e2838
work_keys_str_mv AT stocksarahj outcomesofelectiveinductionoflabourcomparedwithexpectantmanagementpopulationbasedstudy
AT fergusonevelyn outcomesofelectiveinductionoflabourcomparedwithexpectantmanagementpopulationbasedstudy
AT duffyandrew outcomesofelectiveinductionoflabourcomparedwithexpectantmanagementpopulationbasedstudy
AT fordian outcomesofelectiveinductionoflabourcomparedwithexpectantmanagementpopulationbasedstudy
AT chalmersjames outcomesofelectiveinductionoflabourcomparedwithexpectantmanagementpopulationbasedstudy
AT normanjanee outcomesofelectiveinductionoflabourcomparedwithexpectantmanagementpopulationbasedstudy