Cargando…

The reliability of suicide statistics: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Reliable suicide statistics are a prerequisite for suicide monitoring and prevention. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of suicide statistics through a systematic review of the international literature. METHODS: We searched for relevant publications in EMBASE, Ovid Medl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tøllefsen, Ingvild Maria, Hem, Erlend, Ekeberg, Øivind
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3350416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22333684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-12-9
_version_ 1782232658837766144
author Tøllefsen, Ingvild Maria
Hem, Erlend
Ekeberg, Øivind
author_facet Tøllefsen, Ingvild Maria
Hem, Erlend
Ekeberg, Øivind
author_sort Tøllefsen, Ingvild Maria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reliable suicide statistics are a prerequisite for suicide monitoring and prevention. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of suicide statistics through a systematic review of the international literature. METHODS: We searched for relevant publications in EMBASE, Ovid Medline, PubMed, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library up to October 2010. In addition, we screened related studies and reference lists of identified studies. We included studies published in English, German, French, Spanish, Norwegian, Swedish and Danish that assessed the reliability of suicide statistics. We excluded case reports, editorials, letters, comments, abstracts and statistical analyses. All three authors independently screened the abstracts, and then the relevant full-text articles. Disagreements were resolved through consensus. RESULTS: The primary search yielded 127 potential studies, of which 31 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final review. The included studies were published between 1963 and 2009. Twenty were from Europe, seven from North America, two from Asia and two from Oceania. The manner of death had been re-evaluated in 23 studies (40-3,993 cases), and there were six registry studies (195-17,412 cases) and two combined registry and re-evaluation studies. The study conclusions varied, from findings of fairly reliable to poor suicide statistics. Thirteen studies reported fairly reliable suicide statistics or under-reporting of 0-10%. Of the 31 studies during the 46-year period, 52% found more than 10% under-reporting, and 39% found more than 30% under-reporting or poor suicide statistics. Eleven studies reassessed a nationwide representative sample, although these samples were limited to suicide within subgroups. Only two studies compared data from two countries. CONCLUSIONS: The main finding was that there is a lack of systematic assessment of the reliability of suicide statistics. Few studies have been done, and few countries have been covered. The findings support the general under-reporting of suicide. In particular, nationwide studies and comparisons between countries are lacking.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3350416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33504162012-05-12 The reliability of suicide statistics: a systematic review Tøllefsen, Ingvild Maria Hem, Erlend Ekeberg, Øivind BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: Reliable suicide statistics are a prerequisite for suicide monitoring and prevention. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of suicide statistics through a systematic review of the international literature. METHODS: We searched for relevant publications in EMBASE, Ovid Medline, PubMed, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library up to October 2010. In addition, we screened related studies and reference lists of identified studies. We included studies published in English, German, French, Spanish, Norwegian, Swedish and Danish that assessed the reliability of suicide statistics. We excluded case reports, editorials, letters, comments, abstracts and statistical analyses. All three authors independently screened the abstracts, and then the relevant full-text articles. Disagreements were resolved through consensus. RESULTS: The primary search yielded 127 potential studies, of which 31 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final review. The included studies were published between 1963 and 2009. Twenty were from Europe, seven from North America, two from Asia and two from Oceania. The manner of death had been re-evaluated in 23 studies (40-3,993 cases), and there were six registry studies (195-17,412 cases) and two combined registry and re-evaluation studies. The study conclusions varied, from findings of fairly reliable to poor suicide statistics. Thirteen studies reported fairly reliable suicide statistics or under-reporting of 0-10%. Of the 31 studies during the 46-year period, 52% found more than 10% under-reporting, and 39% found more than 30% under-reporting or poor suicide statistics. Eleven studies reassessed a nationwide representative sample, although these samples were limited to suicide within subgroups. Only two studies compared data from two countries. CONCLUSIONS: The main finding was that there is a lack of systematic assessment of the reliability of suicide statistics. Few studies have been done, and few countries have been covered. The findings support the general under-reporting of suicide. In particular, nationwide studies and comparisons between countries are lacking. BioMed Central 2012-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3350416/ /pubmed/22333684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-12-9 Text en Copyright ©2012 Tøllefsen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tøllefsen, Ingvild Maria
Hem, Erlend
Ekeberg, Øivind
The reliability of suicide statistics: a systematic review
title The reliability of suicide statistics: a systematic review
title_full The reliability of suicide statistics: a systematic review
title_fullStr The reliability of suicide statistics: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The reliability of suicide statistics: a systematic review
title_short The reliability of suicide statistics: a systematic review
title_sort reliability of suicide statistics: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3350416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22333684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-12-9
work_keys_str_mv AT tøllefseningvildmaria thereliabilityofsuicidestatisticsasystematicreview
AT hemerlend thereliabilityofsuicidestatisticsasystematicreview
AT ekebergøivind thereliabilityofsuicidestatisticsasystematicreview
AT tøllefseningvildmaria reliabilityofsuicidestatisticsasystematicreview
AT hemerlend reliabilityofsuicidestatisticsasystematicreview
AT ekebergøivind reliabilityofsuicidestatisticsasystematicreview