Cargando…

Protein–protein interactions as a proxy to monitor conformational changes and activation states of the tomato resistance protein I-2

Plant resistance proteins (R) are involved in pathogen recognition and subsequent initiation of defence responses. Their activity is regulated by inter- and intramolecular interactions. In a yeast two-hybrid screen two clones (I2I-1 and I2I-2) specifically interacting with I-2, a Fusarium oxysporum...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lukasik-Shreepaathy, Ewa, Vossen, Jack H., Tameling, Wladimir I. L., de Vroomen, Marianne J., Cornelissen, Ben J. C., Takken, Frank L. W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3350919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22345637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ers021
_version_ 1782232707344891904
author Lukasik-Shreepaathy, Ewa
Vossen, Jack H.
Tameling, Wladimir I. L.
de Vroomen, Marianne J.
Cornelissen, Ben J. C.
Takken, Frank L. W.
author_facet Lukasik-Shreepaathy, Ewa
Vossen, Jack H.
Tameling, Wladimir I. L.
de Vroomen, Marianne J.
Cornelissen, Ben J. C.
Takken, Frank L. W.
author_sort Lukasik-Shreepaathy, Ewa
collection PubMed
description Plant resistance proteins (R) are involved in pathogen recognition and subsequent initiation of defence responses. Their activity is regulated by inter- and intramolecular interactions. In a yeast two-hybrid screen two clones (I2I-1 and I2I-2) specifically interacting with I-2, a Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici resistance protein of the CC-NB-LRR family, were identified. Sequence analysis revealed that I2I-1 belongs to the Formin gene family (SlFormin) whereas I2I-2 has homology to translin-associated protein X (SlTrax). SlFormin required only the N-terminal CC I-2 domain for binding, whereas SlTrax required both I-2 CC and part of the NB-ARC domain. Tomato plants stably silenced for these interactors were not compromised in I-2-mediated disease resistance. When extended or mutated forms of I-2 were used as baits, distinct and often opposite, interaction patterns with the two interactors were observed. These interaction patterns correlated with the proposed activation state of I-2 implying that active and inactive R proteins adopt distinct conformations. It is concluded that the yeast two hybrid system can be used as a proxy to monitor these different conformational states.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3350919
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33509192012-05-14 Protein–protein interactions as a proxy to monitor conformational changes and activation states of the tomato resistance protein I-2 Lukasik-Shreepaathy, Ewa Vossen, Jack H. Tameling, Wladimir I. L. de Vroomen, Marianne J. Cornelissen, Ben J. C. Takken, Frank L. W. J Exp Bot Research Papers Plant resistance proteins (R) are involved in pathogen recognition and subsequent initiation of defence responses. Their activity is regulated by inter- and intramolecular interactions. In a yeast two-hybrid screen two clones (I2I-1 and I2I-2) specifically interacting with I-2, a Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici resistance protein of the CC-NB-LRR family, were identified. Sequence analysis revealed that I2I-1 belongs to the Formin gene family (SlFormin) whereas I2I-2 has homology to translin-associated protein X (SlTrax). SlFormin required only the N-terminal CC I-2 domain for binding, whereas SlTrax required both I-2 CC and part of the NB-ARC domain. Tomato plants stably silenced for these interactors were not compromised in I-2-mediated disease resistance. When extended or mutated forms of I-2 were used as baits, distinct and often opposite, interaction patterns with the two interactors were observed. These interaction patterns correlated with the proposed activation state of I-2 implying that active and inactive R proteins adopt distinct conformations. It is concluded that the yeast two hybrid system can be used as a proxy to monitor these different conformational states. Oxford University Press 2012-05 2012-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3350919/ /pubmed/22345637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ers021 Text en © 2012 The Author(s). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This paper is available online free of all access charges (see http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/open_access.html for further details)
spellingShingle Research Papers
Lukasik-Shreepaathy, Ewa
Vossen, Jack H.
Tameling, Wladimir I. L.
de Vroomen, Marianne J.
Cornelissen, Ben J. C.
Takken, Frank L. W.
Protein–protein interactions as a proxy to monitor conformational changes and activation states of the tomato resistance protein I-2
title Protein–protein interactions as a proxy to monitor conformational changes and activation states of the tomato resistance protein I-2
title_full Protein–protein interactions as a proxy to monitor conformational changes and activation states of the tomato resistance protein I-2
title_fullStr Protein–protein interactions as a proxy to monitor conformational changes and activation states of the tomato resistance protein I-2
title_full_unstemmed Protein–protein interactions as a proxy to monitor conformational changes and activation states of the tomato resistance protein I-2
title_short Protein–protein interactions as a proxy to monitor conformational changes and activation states of the tomato resistance protein I-2
title_sort protein–protein interactions as a proxy to monitor conformational changes and activation states of the tomato resistance protein i-2
topic Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3350919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22345637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ers021
work_keys_str_mv AT lukasikshreepaathyewa proteinproteininteractionsasaproxytomonitorconformationalchangesandactivationstatesofthetomatoresistanceproteini2
AT vossenjackh proteinproteininteractionsasaproxytomonitorconformationalchangesandactivationstatesofthetomatoresistanceproteini2
AT tamelingwladimiril proteinproteininteractionsasaproxytomonitorconformationalchangesandactivationstatesofthetomatoresistanceproteini2
AT devroomenmariannej proteinproteininteractionsasaproxytomonitorconformationalchangesandactivationstatesofthetomatoresistanceproteini2
AT cornelissenbenjc proteinproteininteractionsasaproxytomonitorconformationalchangesandactivationstatesofthetomatoresistanceproteini2
AT takkenfranklw proteinproteininteractionsasaproxytomonitorconformationalchangesandactivationstatesofthetomatoresistanceproteini2