Cargando…

Public support for neonatal screening for Pompe disease, a broad-phenotype condition

BACKGROUND: Neonatal screening for Pompe disease has been introduced in Taiwan and a few U.S. states, while other jurisdictions including some European countries are piloting or considering this screening. First-tier screening flags both classic infantile and late-onset Pompe disease, which challeng...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weinreich, Stephanie Shifra, Rigter, Tessel, van El, Carla Geertruida, Dondorp, Wybo Jan, Kostense, Pieter Johannes, van der Ploeg, Ans T, Reuser, Arnold JJ, Cornel, Martina Cornelia, Hagemans, Marloes Louise Catharina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3351372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22413814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-7-15
_version_ 1782232755757645824
author Weinreich, Stephanie Shifra
Rigter, Tessel
van El, Carla Geertruida
Dondorp, Wybo Jan
Kostense, Pieter Johannes
van der Ploeg, Ans T
Reuser, Arnold JJ
Cornel, Martina Cornelia
Hagemans, Marloes Louise Catharina
author_facet Weinreich, Stephanie Shifra
Rigter, Tessel
van El, Carla Geertruida
Dondorp, Wybo Jan
Kostense, Pieter Johannes
van der Ploeg, Ans T
Reuser, Arnold JJ
Cornel, Martina Cornelia
Hagemans, Marloes Louise Catharina
author_sort Weinreich, Stephanie Shifra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Neonatal screening for Pompe disease has been introduced in Taiwan and a few U.S. states, while other jurisdictions including some European countries are piloting or considering this screening. First-tier screening flags both classic infantile and late-onset Pompe disease, which challenges current screening criteria. Previously, advocacy groups have sometimes supported expanded neonatal screening more than professional experts, while neutral citizens' views were unknown. This study aimed to measure support for neonatal screening for Pompe disease in the general public and to compare it to support among (parents of) patients with this condition. The study was done in the Netherlands, where newborns are not currently screened for Pompe disease. Newborn screening is not mandatory in the Netherlands but current uptake is almost universal. METHODS: A consumer panel (neutral group) and (parents of) patients with Pompe disease (Pompe group) were sent information and a questionnaire. Responses were analyzed of 555 neutral and 58 Pompe-experienced informants who had demonstrated sufficient understanding. RESULTS: 87% of the neutral group and 88% of the Pompe group supported the introduction of screening (95% CI of difference -10 to 7%). The groups were similar in their moral reasoning about screening and acceptance of false positives, but the Pompe-experienced group expected greater benefit from neonatal detection of late-onset disease. Multivariate regression analysis controlling for demographics confirmed that approval of the introduction of screening was independent of having (a child with) Pompe disease. Furthermore, respondents with university education, regardless of whether they have (a child with) Pompe disease, were more likely to be reluctant about the introduction of screening than those with less education, OR for approval 0.29 (95% CI 0.18 to 0.49, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This survey suggests a rather high level of support for newborn screening for Pompe disease, not only among those who have personal experience of the disease but also among the general public in the Netherlands. Optional screening on the basis of informed parental consent is probably unrealistic, underlining the need for new guidelines to help policymakers in their consideration of newborn screening for broad phenotype conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3351372
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33513722012-05-15 Public support for neonatal screening for Pompe disease, a broad-phenotype condition Weinreich, Stephanie Shifra Rigter, Tessel van El, Carla Geertruida Dondorp, Wybo Jan Kostense, Pieter Johannes van der Ploeg, Ans T Reuser, Arnold JJ Cornel, Martina Cornelia Hagemans, Marloes Louise Catharina Orphanet J Rare Dis Research BACKGROUND: Neonatal screening for Pompe disease has been introduced in Taiwan and a few U.S. states, while other jurisdictions including some European countries are piloting or considering this screening. First-tier screening flags both classic infantile and late-onset Pompe disease, which challenges current screening criteria. Previously, advocacy groups have sometimes supported expanded neonatal screening more than professional experts, while neutral citizens' views were unknown. This study aimed to measure support for neonatal screening for Pompe disease in the general public and to compare it to support among (parents of) patients with this condition. The study was done in the Netherlands, where newborns are not currently screened for Pompe disease. Newborn screening is not mandatory in the Netherlands but current uptake is almost universal. METHODS: A consumer panel (neutral group) and (parents of) patients with Pompe disease (Pompe group) were sent information and a questionnaire. Responses were analyzed of 555 neutral and 58 Pompe-experienced informants who had demonstrated sufficient understanding. RESULTS: 87% of the neutral group and 88% of the Pompe group supported the introduction of screening (95% CI of difference -10 to 7%). The groups were similar in their moral reasoning about screening and acceptance of false positives, but the Pompe-experienced group expected greater benefit from neonatal detection of late-onset disease. Multivariate regression analysis controlling for demographics confirmed that approval of the introduction of screening was independent of having (a child with) Pompe disease. Furthermore, respondents with university education, regardless of whether they have (a child with) Pompe disease, were more likely to be reluctant about the introduction of screening than those with less education, OR for approval 0.29 (95% CI 0.18 to 0.49, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This survey suggests a rather high level of support for newborn screening for Pompe disease, not only among those who have personal experience of the disease but also among the general public in the Netherlands. Optional screening on the basis of informed parental consent is probably unrealistic, underlining the need for new guidelines to help policymakers in their consideration of newborn screening for broad phenotype conditions. BioMed Central 2012-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3351372/ /pubmed/22413814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-7-15 Text en Copyright ©2012 Weinreich et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Weinreich, Stephanie Shifra
Rigter, Tessel
van El, Carla Geertruida
Dondorp, Wybo Jan
Kostense, Pieter Johannes
van der Ploeg, Ans T
Reuser, Arnold JJ
Cornel, Martina Cornelia
Hagemans, Marloes Louise Catharina
Public support for neonatal screening for Pompe disease, a broad-phenotype condition
title Public support for neonatal screening for Pompe disease, a broad-phenotype condition
title_full Public support for neonatal screening for Pompe disease, a broad-phenotype condition
title_fullStr Public support for neonatal screening for Pompe disease, a broad-phenotype condition
title_full_unstemmed Public support for neonatal screening for Pompe disease, a broad-phenotype condition
title_short Public support for neonatal screening for Pompe disease, a broad-phenotype condition
title_sort public support for neonatal screening for pompe disease, a broad-phenotype condition
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3351372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22413814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-7-15
work_keys_str_mv AT weinreichstephanieshifra publicsupportforneonatalscreeningforpompediseaseabroadphenotypecondition
AT rigtertessel publicsupportforneonatalscreeningforpompediseaseabroadphenotypecondition
AT vanelcarlageertruida publicsupportforneonatalscreeningforpompediseaseabroadphenotypecondition
AT dondorpwybojan publicsupportforneonatalscreeningforpompediseaseabroadphenotypecondition
AT kostensepieterjohannes publicsupportforneonatalscreeningforpompediseaseabroadphenotypecondition
AT vanderploeganst publicsupportforneonatalscreeningforpompediseaseabroadphenotypecondition
AT reuserarnoldjj publicsupportforneonatalscreeningforpompediseaseabroadphenotypecondition
AT cornelmartinacornelia publicsupportforneonatalscreeningforpompediseaseabroadphenotypecondition
AT hagemansmarloeslouisecatharina publicsupportforneonatalscreeningforpompediseaseabroadphenotypecondition