Cargando…

Revisiting vascular patency after spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with conservation of splenic vessels

BACKGROUND: We evaluated vascular patency and potential changes in preserved spleens after laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SPDP) with conservation of both splenic vessels. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the patency of conserved splenic vessels in patients who underwent la...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hwang, Ho Kyoung, Chung, Young Eun, Kim, Kyoung Ah, Kang, Chang Moo, Lee, Woo Jung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3351607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22223114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2108-0
_version_ 1782232785258283008
author Hwang, Ho Kyoung
Chung, Young Eun
Kim, Kyoung Ah
Kang, Chang Moo
Lee, Woo Jung
author_facet Hwang, Ho Kyoung
Chung, Young Eun
Kim, Kyoung Ah
Kang, Chang Moo
Lee, Woo Jung
author_sort Hwang, Ho Kyoung
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We evaluated vascular patency and potential changes in preserved spleens after laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SPDP) with conservation of both splenic vessels. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the patency of conserved splenic vessels in patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic splenic vessel-conserving SPDP from January 2006 to August 2010. The patency of the conserved splenic vessels was evaluated by abdominal computed tomography and classified into three grades according to the degree of severity. RESULTS: Among 30 patients with splenic vessel-conserving laparoscopic SPDP, 29 patients with complete follow-up data were included in this study. During the follow-up period (median: 13.2 months), grades 1 and 2 splenic arterial obliteration were observed in one patient each. A total of five patients (17.2%) showed grade 1 or 2 obliteration in conserved splenic veins. Most patients (82.8%) had patent conserved splenic vein. Four patients (13.8%) eventually developed collateral venous vessels around gastric fundus and reserved spleen, but no spleen infarction was found, and none presented clinical relevant symptoms, such as variceal bleeding. There was no statistical difference in vascular patency between the laparoscopic and robotic groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients showed intact vascular patency in conserved splenic vessels and no secondary changes in the preserved spleen after laparoscopic splenic vessel-conserving SPDP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3351607
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33516072012-05-31 Revisiting vascular patency after spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with conservation of splenic vessels Hwang, Ho Kyoung Chung, Young Eun Kim, Kyoung Ah Kang, Chang Moo Lee, Woo Jung Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: We evaluated vascular patency and potential changes in preserved spleens after laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SPDP) with conservation of both splenic vessels. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the patency of conserved splenic vessels in patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic splenic vessel-conserving SPDP from January 2006 to August 2010. The patency of the conserved splenic vessels was evaluated by abdominal computed tomography and classified into three grades according to the degree of severity. RESULTS: Among 30 patients with splenic vessel-conserving laparoscopic SPDP, 29 patients with complete follow-up data were included in this study. During the follow-up period (median: 13.2 months), grades 1 and 2 splenic arterial obliteration were observed in one patient each. A total of five patients (17.2%) showed grade 1 or 2 obliteration in conserved splenic veins. Most patients (82.8%) had patent conserved splenic vein. Four patients (13.8%) eventually developed collateral venous vessels around gastric fundus and reserved spleen, but no spleen infarction was found, and none presented clinical relevant symptoms, such as variceal bleeding. There was no statistical difference in vascular patency between the laparoscopic and robotic groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients showed intact vascular patency in conserved splenic vessels and no secondary changes in the preserved spleen after laparoscopic splenic vessel-conserving SPDP. Springer-Verlag 2012-01-06 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3351607/ /pubmed/22223114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2108-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Hwang, Ho Kyoung
Chung, Young Eun
Kim, Kyoung Ah
Kang, Chang Moo
Lee, Woo Jung
Revisiting vascular patency after spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with conservation of splenic vessels
title Revisiting vascular patency after spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with conservation of splenic vessels
title_full Revisiting vascular patency after spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with conservation of splenic vessels
title_fullStr Revisiting vascular patency after spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with conservation of splenic vessels
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting vascular patency after spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with conservation of splenic vessels
title_short Revisiting vascular patency after spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with conservation of splenic vessels
title_sort revisiting vascular patency after spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with conservation of splenic vessels
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3351607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22223114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2108-0
work_keys_str_mv AT hwanghokyoung revisitingvascularpatencyafterspleenpreservinglaparoscopicdistalpancreatectomywithconservationofsplenicvessels
AT chungyoungeun revisitingvascularpatencyafterspleenpreservinglaparoscopicdistalpancreatectomywithconservationofsplenicvessels
AT kimkyoungah revisitingvascularpatencyafterspleenpreservinglaparoscopicdistalpancreatectomywithconservationofsplenicvessels
AT kangchangmoo revisitingvascularpatencyafterspleenpreservinglaparoscopicdistalpancreatectomywithconservationofsplenicvessels
AT leewoojung revisitingvascularpatencyafterspleenpreservinglaparoscopicdistalpancreatectomywithconservationofsplenicvessels