Cargando…

The clinical use of biomarkers as prognostic factors in Ewing sarcoma

Ewing Sarcoma is the second most common primary bone sarcoma with 900 new diagnoses per year in Europe (EU27). It has a poor survival rate in the face of metastatic disease, with no more than 10% survival of the 35% who develop recurrence. Despite the remaining majority having localised disease, app...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Maldegem, Annmeik M, Hogendoorn, Pancras CW, Hassan, Andrew B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3351700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22587879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-3329-2-7
_version_ 1782232790569320448
author van Maldegem, Annmeik M
Hogendoorn, Pancras CW
Hassan, Andrew B
author_facet van Maldegem, Annmeik M
Hogendoorn, Pancras CW
Hassan, Andrew B
author_sort van Maldegem, Annmeik M
collection PubMed
description Ewing Sarcoma is the second most common primary bone sarcoma with 900 new diagnoses per year in Europe (EU27). It has a poor survival rate in the face of metastatic disease, with no more than 10% survival of the 35% who develop recurrence. Despite the remaining majority having localised disease, approximately 30% still relapse and die despite salvage therapies. Prognostic factors may identify patients at higher risk that might require differential therapeutic interventions. Aside from phenotypic features, quantitative biomarkers based on biological measurements may help identify tumours that are more aggressive. We audited the research which has been done to identify prognostic biomarkers for Ewing sarcoma in the past 15 years. We identified 86 articles were identified using defined search criteria. A total of 11,625 patients were reported, although this number reflects reanalysis of several cohorts. For phenotypic markers, independent reports suggest that tumour size > 8 cm and the presence of metastasis appeared strong predictors of negative outcome. Good histological response (necrosis > 90%) after treatment appeared a significant predictor for a positive outcome. However, data proposing biological biomarkers for practical clinical use remain un-validated with only one secondary report published. Our recommendation is that we can stratify patients according to their stage and using the phenotypic features of metastases, tumour size and histological response. For biological biomarkers, we suggest a number of validating studies including markers for 9p21 locus, heat shock proteins, telomerase related markers, interleukins, tumour necrosis factors, VEGF pathway, lymphocyte count, and a number of other markers including Ki-67.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3351700
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33517002012-05-16 The clinical use of biomarkers as prognostic factors in Ewing sarcoma van Maldegem, Annmeik M Hogendoorn, Pancras CW Hassan, Andrew B Clin Sarcoma Res Short Report Ewing Sarcoma is the second most common primary bone sarcoma with 900 new diagnoses per year in Europe (EU27). It has a poor survival rate in the face of metastatic disease, with no more than 10% survival of the 35% who develop recurrence. Despite the remaining majority having localised disease, approximately 30% still relapse and die despite salvage therapies. Prognostic factors may identify patients at higher risk that might require differential therapeutic interventions. Aside from phenotypic features, quantitative biomarkers based on biological measurements may help identify tumours that are more aggressive. We audited the research which has been done to identify prognostic biomarkers for Ewing sarcoma in the past 15 years. We identified 86 articles were identified using defined search criteria. A total of 11,625 patients were reported, although this number reflects reanalysis of several cohorts. For phenotypic markers, independent reports suggest that tumour size > 8 cm and the presence of metastasis appeared strong predictors of negative outcome. Good histological response (necrosis > 90%) after treatment appeared a significant predictor for a positive outcome. However, data proposing biological biomarkers for practical clinical use remain un-validated with only one secondary report published. Our recommendation is that we can stratify patients according to their stage and using the phenotypic features of metastases, tumour size and histological response. For biological biomarkers, we suggest a number of validating studies including markers for 9p21 locus, heat shock proteins, telomerase related markers, interleukins, tumour necrosis factors, VEGF pathway, lymphocyte count, and a number of other markers including Ki-67. BioMed Central 2012-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3351700/ /pubmed/22587879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-3329-2-7 Text en Copyright ©2012 van Maldegem et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Report
van Maldegem, Annmeik M
Hogendoorn, Pancras CW
Hassan, Andrew B
The clinical use of biomarkers as prognostic factors in Ewing sarcoma
title The clinical use of biomarkers as prognostic factors in Ewing sarcoma
title_full The clinical use of biomarkers as prognostic factors in Ewing sarcoma
title_fullStr The clinical use of biomarkers as prognostic factors in Ewing sarcoma
title_full_unstemmed The clinical use of biomarkers as prognostic factors in Ewing sarcoma
title_short The clinical use of biomarkers as prognostic factors in Ewing sarcoma
title_sort clinical use of biomarkers as prognostic factors in ewing sarcoma
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3351700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22587879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-3329-2-7
work_keys_str_mv AT vanmaldegemannmeikm theclinicaluseofbiomarkersasprognosticfactorsinewingsarcoma
AT hogendoornpancrascw theclinicaluseofbiomarkersasprognosticfactorsinewingsarcoma
AT hassanandrewb theclinicaluseofbiomarkersasprognosticfactorsinewingsarcoma
AT vanmaldegemannmeikm clinicaluseofbiomarkersasprognosticfactorsinewingsarcoma
AT hogendoornpancrascw clinicaluseofbiomarkersasprognosticfactorsinewingsarcoma
AT hassanandrewb clinicaluseofbiomarkersasprognosticfactorsinewingsarcoma