Cargando…

Methods for the evaluation of hospital cooperation activities (Systematic review protocol)

BACKGROUND: Hospital partnerships, mergers and cooperatives are arrangements frequently seen as a means of improving health service delivery. Many of the assumptions used in planning hospital cooperatives are not stated clearly and are often based on limited or poor scientific evidence. METHODS: Thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rotter, Thomas, Popa, Daniela, Riley, Beatrice, Ellermann, Tim, Ryll, Ulrike, Burazeri, Genc, Daemen, Piet, Peeters, Guy, Brand, Helmut
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3351703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22587989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-11
_version_ 1782232791047471104
author Rotter, Thomas
Popa, Daniela
Riley, Beatrice
Ellermann, Tim
Ryll, Ulrike
Burazeri, Genc
Daemen, Piet
Peeters, Guy
Brand, Helmut
author_facet Rotter, Thomas
Popa, Daniela
Riley, Beatrice
Ellermann, Tim
Ryll, Ulrike
Burazeri, Genc
Daemen, Piet
Peeters, Guy
Brand, Helmut
author_sort Rotter, Thomas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hospital partnerships, mergers and cooperatives are arrangements frequently seen as a means of improving health service delivery. Many of the assumptions used in planning hospital cooperatives are not stated clearly and are often based on limited or poor scientific evidence. METHODS: This is a protocol for a systematic review, following the Cochrane EPOC methodology. The review aims to document, catalogue and synthesize the existing literature on the reported methods for the evaluation of hospital cooperation activities as well as methods of hospital cooperation. We will search the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness, the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and bibliographic databases including PubMed (via NLM), Web of Science, NHS EED, Business Source Premier (via EBSCO) and Global Health for publications that report on methods for evaluating hospital cooperatives, strategic partnerships, mergers, alliances, networks and related activities and methods used for such partnerships. The method proposed by the Cochrane EPOC group regarding randomized study designs, controlled clinical trials, controlled before and after studies, and interrupted time series will be followed. In addition, we will also include cohort, case-control studies, and relevant non-comparative publications such as case reports. We will categorize and analyze the review findings according to the study design employed, the study quality (low versus high quality studies) and the method reported in the primary studies. We will present the results of studies in tabular form. DISCUSSION: Overall, the systematic review aims to identify, assess and synthesize the evidence to underpin hospital cooperation activities as defined in this protocol. As a result, the review will provide an evidence base for partnerships, alliances or other fields of cooperation in a hospital setting. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42011001579
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3351703
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33517032012-05-16 Methods for the evaluation of hospital cooperation activities (Systematic review protocol) Rotter, Thomas Popa, Daniela Riley, Beatrice Ellermann, Tim Ryll, Ulrike Burazeri, Genc Daemen, Piet Peeters, Guy Brand, Helmut Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Hospital partnerships, mergers and cooperatives are arrangements frequently seen as a means of improving health service delivery. Many of the assumptions used in planning hospital cooperatives are not stated clearly and are often based on limited or poor scientific evidence. METHODS: This is a protocol for a systematic review, following the Cochrane EPOC methodology. The review aims to document, catalogue and synthesize the existing literature on the reported methods for the evaluation of hospital cooperation activities as well as methods of hospital cooperation. We will search the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness, the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and bibliographic databases including PubMed (via NLM), Web of Science, NHS EED, Business Source Premier (via EBSCO) and Global Health for publications that report on methods for evaluating hospital cooperatives, strategic partnerships, mergers, alliances, networks and related activities and methods used for such partnerships. The method proposed by the Cochrane EPOC group regarding randomized study designs, controlled clinical trials, controlled before and after studies, and interrupted time series will be followed. In addition, we will also include cohort, case-control studies, and relevant non-comparative publications such as case reports. We will categorize and analyze the review findings according to the study design employed, the study quality (low versus high quality studies) and the method reported in the primary studies. We will present the results of studies in tabular form. DISCUSSION: Overall, the systematic review aims to identify, assess and synthesize the evidence to underpin hospital cooperation activities as defined in this protocol. As a result, the review will provide an evidence base for partnerships, alliances or other fields of cooperation in a hospital setting. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42011001579 BioMed Central 2012-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3351703/ /pubmed/22587989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-11 Text en Copyright ©2012 Rotter et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Protocol
Rotter, Thomas
Popa, Daniela
Riley, Beatrice
Ellermann, Tim
Ryll, Ulrike
Burazeri, Genc
Daemen, Piet
Peeters, Guy
Brand, Helmut
Methods for the evaluation of hospital cooperation activities (Systematic review protocol)
title Methods for the evaluation of hospital cooperation activities (Systematic review protocol)
title_full Methods for the evaluation of hospital cooperation activities (Systematic review protocol)
title_fullStr Methods for the evaluation of hospital cooperation activities (Systematic review protocol)
title_full_unstemmed Methods for the evaluation of hospital cooperation activities (Systematic review protocol)
title_short Methods for the evaluation of hospital cooperation activities (Systematic review protocol)
title_sort methods for the evaluation of hospital cooperation activities (systematic review protocol)
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3351703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22587989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-11
work_keys_str_mv AT rotterthomas methodsfortheevaluationofhospitalcooperationactivitiessystematicreviewprotocol
AT popadaniela methodsfortheevaluationofhospitalcooperationactivitiessystematicreviewprotocol
AT rileybeatrice methodsfortheevaluationofhospitalcooperationactivitiessystematicreviewprotocol
AT ellermanntim methodsfortheevaluationofhospitalcooperationactivitiessystematicreviewprotocol
AT ryllulrike methodsfortheevaluationofhospitalcooperationactivitiessystematicreviewprotocol
AT burazerigenc methodsfortheevaluationofhospitalcooperationactivitiessystematicreviewprotocol
AT daemenpiet methodsfortheevaluationofhospitalcooperationactivitiessystematicreviewprotocol
AT peetersguy methodsfortheevaluationofhospitalcooperationactivitiessystematicreviewprotocol
AT brandhelmut methodsfortheevaluationofhospitalcooperationactivitiessystematicreviewprotocol