Cargando…
Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach
BACKGROUND: Rapid reviews have emerged as a streamlined approach to synthesizing evidence - typically for informing emergent decisions faced by decision makers in health care settings. Although there is growing use of rapid review 'methods', and proliferation of rapid review products, ther...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3351736/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22587960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-10 |
_version_ | 1782232797368287232 |
---|---|
author | Khangura, Sara Konnyu, Kristin Cushman, Rob Grimshaw, Jeremy Moher, David |
author_facet | Khangura, Sara Konnyu, Kristin Cushman, Rob Grimshaw, Jeremy Moher, David |
author_sort | Khangura, Sara |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Rapid reviews have emerged as a streamlined approach to synthesizing evidence - typically for informing emergent decisions faced by decision makers in health care settings. Although there is growing use of rapid review 'methods', and proliferation of rapid review products, there is a dearth of published literature on rapid review methodology. This paper outlines our experience with rapidly producing, publishing and disseminating evidence summaries in the context of our Knowledge to Action (KTA) research program. METHODS: The KTA research program is a two-year project designed to develop and assess the impact of a regional knowledge infrastructure that supports evidence-informed decision making by regional managers and stakeholders. As part of this program, we have developed evidence summaries - our form of rapid review - which have come to be a flagship component of this project. Our eight-step approach for producing evidence summaries has been developed iteratively, based on evidence (where available), experience and knowledge user feedback. The aim of our evidence summary approach is to deliver quality evidence that is both timely and user-friendly. RESULTS: From November 2009 to March 2011 we have produced 11 evidence summaries on a diverse range of questions identified by our knowledge users. Topic areas have included questions of clinical effectiveness to questions on health systems and/or health services. Knowledge users have reported evidence summaries to be of high value in informing their decisions and initiatives. We continue to experiment with incorporating more of the established methods of systematic reviews, while maintaining our capacity to deliver a final product in a timely manner. CONCLUSIONS: The evolution of the KTA rapid review evidence summaries has been a positive one. We have developed an approach that appears to be addressing a need by knowledge users for timely, user-friendly, and trustworthy evidence and have transparently reported these methods here for the wider rapid review and scientific community. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3351736 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33517362012-05-16 Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach Khangura, Sara Konnyu, Kristin Cushman, Rob Grimshaw, Jeremy Moher, David Syst Rev Methodology BACKGROUND: Rapid reviews have emerged as a streamlined approach to synthesizing evidence - typically for informing emergent decisions faced by decision makers in health care settings. Although there is growing use of rapid review 'methods', and proliferation of rapid review products, there is a dearth of published literature on rapid review methodology. This paper outlines our experience with rapidly producing, publishing and disseminating evidence summaries in the context of our Knowledge to Action (KTA) research program. METHODS: The KTA research program is a two-year project designed to develop and assess the impact of a regional knowledge infrastructure that supports evidence-informed decision making by regional managers and stakeholders. As part of this program, we have developed evidence summaries - our form of rapid review - which have come to be a flagship component of this project. Our eight-step approach for producing evidence summaries has been developed iteratively, based on evidence (where available), experience and knowledge user feedback. The aim of our evidence summary approach is to deliver quality evidence that is both timely and user-friendly. RESULTS: From November 2009 to March 2011 we have produced 11 evidence summaries on a diverse range of questions identified by our knowledge users. Topic areas have included questions of clinical effectiveness to questions on health systems and/or health services. Knowledge users have reported evidence summaries to be of high value in informing their decisions and initiatives. We continue to experiment with incorporating more of the established methods of systematic reviews, while maintaining our capacity to deliver a final product in a timely manner. CONCLUSIONS: The evolution of the KTA rapid review evidence summaries has been a positive one. We have developed an approach that appears to be addressing a need by knowledge users for timely, user-friendly, and trustworthy evidence and have transparently reported these methods here for the wider rapid review and scientific community. BioMed Central 2012-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3351736/ /pubmed/22587960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-10 Text en Copyright ©2012 Khangura et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Khangura, Sara Konnyu, Kristin Cushman, Rob Grimshaw, Jeremy Moher, David Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach |
title | Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach |
title_full | Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach |
title_fullStr | Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach |
title_short | Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach |
title_sort | evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3351736/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22587960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-10 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khangurasara evidencesummariestheevolutionofarapidreviewapproach AT konnyukristin evidencesummariestheevolutionofarapidreviewapproach AT cushmanrob evidencesummariestheevolutionofarapidreviewapproach AT grimshawjeremy evidencesummariestheevolutionofarapidreviewapproach AT moherdavid evidencesummariestheevolutionofarapidreviewapproach |