Cargando…

Psychometric validation of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the factor structure and psychometric properties of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale (CRBS). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In total, 2636 cardiac inpatients from 11 hospitals completed a survey. One year later, participants comple...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shanmugasegaram, Shamila, Gagliese, Lucia, Oh, Paul, Stewart, Donna E, Brister, Stephanie J, Chan, Victoria, Grace, Sherry L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3351783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21937522
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215511410579
_version_ 1782232801810055168
author Shanmugasegaram, Shamila
Gagliese, Lucia
Oh, Paul
Stewart, Donna E
Brister, Stephanie J
Chan, Victoria
Grace, Sherry L
author_facet Shanmugasegaram, Shamila
Gagliese, Lucia
Oh, Paul
Stewart, Donna E
Brister, Stephanie J
Chan, Victoria
Grace, Sherry L
author_sort Shanmugasegaram, Shamila
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the factor structure and psychometric properties of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale (CRBS). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In total, 2636 cardiac inpatients from 11 hospitals completed a survey. One year later, participants completed a follow-up survey, which included the CRBS. A subsample of patients also completed a third survey which included the CRBS, the Cardiac Rehabilitation Enrolment Obstacles scale, and the Beliefs About Cardiac Rehabilitation scale three weeks later. The CRBS asked participants to rate 21 cardiac rehabilitation barriers on a five-point Likert scale regardless of cardiac rehabilitation referral or enrolment. RESULTS: Maximum likelihood factor analysis with oblique rotation resulted in a four-factor solution: perceived need/healthcare factors (eigenvalue = 6.13, Cronbach’s α = .89), logistical factors (eigenvalue = 5.83, Cronbach’s α = .88), work/time conflicts (eigenvalue = 3.78, Cronbach’s α = .71), and comorbidities/functional status (eigenvalue = 4.85, Cronbach’s α = .83). Mean total perceived barriers were significantly greater among non-enrollees than cardiac rehabilitation enrollees (P < .001). Convergent validity with the Beliefs About Cardiac Rehabilitation and Cardiac Rehabilitation Enrolment Obstacles scales was also demonstrated. Test-retest reliability of the CRBS was acceptable (intraclass correlation coefficient = .64). CONCLUSION: The CRBS consists of four subscales and has sound psychometric properties. The extent to which identified barriers can be addressed to facilitate greater cardiac rehabilitation utilization warrants future study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3351783
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33517832012-05-16 Psychometric validation of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale Shanmugasegaram, Shamila Gagliese, Lucia Oh, Paul Stewart, Donna E Brister, Stephanie J Chan, Victoria Grace, Sherry L Clin Rehabil Data Collection Tools OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the factor structure and psychometric properties of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale (CRBS). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In total, 2636 cardiac inpatients from 11 hospitals completed a survey. One year later, participants completed a follow-up survey, which included the CRBS. A subsample of patients also completed a third survey which included the CRBS, the Cardiac Rehabilitation Enrolment Obstacles scale, and the Beliefs About Cardiac Rehabilitation scale three weeks later. The CRBS asked participants to rate 21 cardiac rehabilitation barriers on a five-point Likert scale regardless of cardiac rehabilitation referral or enrolment. RESULTS: Maximum likelihood factor analysis with oblique rotation resulted in a four-factor solution: perceived need/healthcare factors (eigenvalue = 6.13, Cronbach’s α = .89), logistical factors (eigenvalue = 5.83, Cronbach’s α = .88), work/time conflicts (eigenvalue = 3.78, Cronbach’s α = .71), and comorbidities/functional status (eigenvalue = 4.85, Cronbach’s α = .83). Mean total perceived barriers were significantly greater among non-enrollees than cardiac rehabilitation enrollees (P < .001). Convergent validity with the Beliefs About Cardiac Rehabilitation and Cardiac Rehabilitation Enrolment Obstacles scales was also demonstrated. Test-retest reliability of the CRBS was acceptable (intraclass correlation coefficient = .64). CONCLUSION: The CRBS consists of four subscales and has sound psychometric properties. The extent to which identified barriers can be addressed to facilitate greater cardiac rehabilitation utilization warrants future study. SAGE Publications 2012-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3351783/ /pubmed/21937522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215511410579 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Data Collection Tools
Shanmugasegaram, Shamila
Gagliese, Lucia
Oh, Paul
Stewart, Donna E
Brister, Stephanie J
Chan, Victoria
Grace, Sherry L
Psychometric validation of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale
title Psychometric validation of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale
title_full Psychometric validation of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale
title_fullStr Psychometric validation of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric validation of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale
title_short Psychometric validation of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale
title_sort psychometric validation of the cardiac rehabilitation barriers scale
topic Data Collection Tools
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3351783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21937522
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215511410579
work_keys_str_mv AT shanmugasegaramshamila psychometricvalidationofthecardiacrehabilitationbarriersscale
AT gaglieselucia psychometricvalidationofthecardiacrehabilitationbarriersscale
AT ohpaul psychometricvalidationofthecardiacrehabilitationbarriersscale
AT stewartdonnae psychometricvalidationofthecardiacrehabilitationbarriersscale
AT bristerstephaniej psychometricvalidationofthecardiacrehabilitationbarriersscale
AT chanvictoria psychometricvalidationofthecardiacrehabilitationbarriersscale
AT gracesherryl psychometricvalidationofthecardiacrehabilitationbarriersscale