Cargando…
Psychometric validation of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the factor structure and psychometric properties of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale (CRBS). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In total, 2636 cardiac inpatients from 11 hospitals completed a survey. One year later, participants comple...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3351783/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21937522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215511410579 |
_version_ | 1782232801810055168 |
---|---|
author | Shanmugasegaram, Shamila Gagliese, Lucia Oh, Paul Stewart, Donna E Brister, Stephanie J Chan, Victoria Grace, Sherry L |
author_facet | Shanmugasegaram, Shamila Gagliese, Lucia Oh, Paul Stewart, Donna E Brister, Stephanie J Chan, Victoria Grace, Sherry L |
author_sort | Shanmugasegaram, Shamila |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the factor structure and psychometric properties of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale (CRBS). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In total, 2636 cardiac inpatients from 11 hospitals completed a survey. One year later, participants completed a follow-up survey, which included the CRBS. A subsample of patients also completed a third survey which included the CRBS, the Cardiac Rehabilitation Enrolment Obstacles scale, and the Beliefs About Cardiac Rehabilitation scale three weeks later. The CRBS asked participants to rate 21 cardiac rehabilitation barriers on a five-point Likert scale regardless of cardiac rehabilitation referral or enrolment. RESULTS: Maximum likelihood factor analysis with oblique rotation resulted in a four-factor solution: perceived need/healthcare factors (eigenvalue = 6.13, Cronbach’s α = .89), logistical factors (eigenvalue = 5.83, Cronbach’s α = .88), work/time conflicts (eigenvalue = 3.78, Cronbach’s α = .71), and comorbidities/functional status (eigenvalue = 4.85, Cronbach’s α = .83). Mean total perceived barriers were significantly greater among non-enrollees than cardiac rehabilitation enrollees (P < .001). Convergent validity with the Beliefs About Cardiac Rehabilitation and Cardiac Rehabilitation Enrolment Obstacles scales was also demonstrated. Test-retest reliability of the CRBS was acceptable (intraclass correlation coefficient = .64). CONCLUSION: The CRBS consists of four subscales and has sound psychometric properties. The extent to which identified barriers can be addressed to facilitate greater cardiac rehabilitation utilization warrants future study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3351783 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33517832012-05-16 Psychometric validation of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale Shanmugasegaram, Shamila Gagliese, Lucia Oh, Paul Stewart, Donna E Brister, Stephanie J Chan, Victoria Grace, Sherry L Clin Rehabil Data Collection Tools OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the factor structure and psychometric properties of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale (CRBS). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In total, 2636 cardiac inpatients from 11 hospitals completed a survey. One year later, participants completed a follow-up survey, which included the CRBS. A subsample of patients also completed a third survey which included the CRBS, the Cardiac Rehabilitation Enrolment Obstacles scale, and the Beliefs About Cardiac Rehabilitation scale three weeks later. The CRBS asked participants to rate 21 cardiac rehabilitation barriers on a five-point Likert scale regardless of cardiac rehabilitation referral or enrolment. RESULTS: Maximum likelihood factor analysis with oblique rotation resulted in a four-factor solution: perceived need/healthcare factors (eigenvalue = 6.13, Cronbach’s α = .89), logistical factors (eigenvalue = 5.83, Cronbach’s α = .88), work/time conflicts (eigenvalue = 3.78, Cronbach’s α = .71), and comorbidities/functional status (eigenvalue = 4.85, Cronbach’s α = .83). Mean total perceived barriers were significantly greater among non-enrollees than cardiac rehabilitation enrollees (P < .001). Convergent validity with the Beliefs About Cardiac Rehabilitation and Cardiac Rehabilitation Enrolment Obstacles scales was also demonstrated. Test-retest reliability of the CRBS was acceptable (intraclass correlation coefficient = .64). CONCLUSION: The CRBS consists of four subscales and has sound psychometric properties. The extent to which identified barriers can be addressed to facilitate greater cardiac rehabilitation utilization warrants future study. SAGE Publications 2012-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3351783/ /pubmed/21937522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215511410579 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Data Collection Tools Shanmugasegaram, Shamila Gagliese, Lucia Oh, Paul Stewart, Donna E Brister, Stephanie J Chan, Victoria Grace, Sherry L Psychometric validation of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale |
title | Psychometric validation of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale |
title_full | Psychometric validation of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale |
title_fullStr | Psychometric validation of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychometric validation of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale |
title_short | Psychometric validation of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale |
title_sort | psychometric validation of the cardiac rehabilitation barriers scale |
topic | Data Collection Tools |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3351783/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21937522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215511410579 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shanmugasegaramshamila psychometricvalidationofthecardiacrehabilitationbarriersscale AT gaglieselucia psychometricvalidationofthecardiacrehabilitationbarriersscale AT ohpaul psychometricvalidationofthecardiacrehabilitationbarriersscale AT stewartdonnae psychometricvalidationofthecardiacrehabilitationbarriersscale AT bristerstephaniej psychometricvalidationofthecardiacrehabilitationbarriersscale AT chanvictoria psychometricvalidationofthecardiacrehabilitationbarriersscale AT gracesherryl psychometricvalidationofthecardiacrehabilitationbarriersscale |