Cargando…
TME quality in rectal cancer surgery
BACKGROUND: The concept of total mesorectal excision has revolutionised rectal cancer surgery. TME reduces the rate of local recurrence and tumour associated mortality. However, in clinical trials only 50% of the removed rectal tumours have an optimal TME quality. Patients: During a period of 36 mon...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3351953/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20696640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-783X-15-7-292 |
_version_ | 1782232816486973440 |
---|---|
author | Herzog, T Belyaev, O Chromik, AM Weyhe, D Mueller, CA Munding, J Tannapfel, A Uhl, W Seelig, MH |
author_facet | Herzog, T Belyaev, O Chromik, AM Weyhe, D Mueller, CA Munding, J Tannapfel, A Uhl, W Seelig, MH |
author_sort | Herzog, T |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The concept of total mesorectal excision has revolutionised rectal cancer surgery. TME reduces the rate of local recurrence and tumour associated mortality. However, in clinical trials only 50% of the removed rectal tumours have an optimal TME quality. Patients: During a period of 36 months we performed 103 rectal resections. The majority of patients (76%; 78/103) received an anterior resection. The remaining patients underwent either abdominoperineal resection (16%; 17/103), Hartmann's procedure (6%; 6/103) or colectomy (2%; 2/103). RESULTS: In 90% (93/103) TME quality control could be performed. 99% (92/93) of resected tumours had optimal TME quality. In 1% (1/93) the mesorectum was nearly complete. None of the removed tumours had an incomplete mesorectum. In 98% (91/93) the circumferential resection margin was negative. Major surgical complications occurred in 17% (18/103). 5% (4/78) of patients with anterior resection had anastomotic leakage. 17% (17/103) developed wound infections. Mortality after elective surgery was 4% (4/95). CONCLUSION: Optimal TME quality results can be achieved in all stages of rectal cancer with a rate of morbidity and mortality comparable to the results from the literature. Future studies should evaluate outcome and local recurrence in accordance to the degree of TME quality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3351953 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33519532012-05-16 TME quality in rectal cancer surgery Herzog, T Belyaev, O Chromik, AM Weyhe, D Mueller, CA Munding, J Tannapfel, A Uhl, W Seelig, MH Eur J Med Res Research BACKGROUND: The concept of total mesorectal excision has revolutionised rectal cancer surgery. TME reduces the rate of local recurrence and tumour associated mortality. However, in clinical trials only 50% of the removed rectal tumours have an optimal TME quality. Patients: During a period of 36 months we performed 103 rectal resections. The majority of patients (76%; 78/103) received an anterior resection. The remaining patients underwent either abdominoperineal resection (16%; 17/103), Hartmann's procedure (6%; 6/103) or colectomy (2%; 2/103). RESULTS: In 90% (93/103) TME quality control could be performed. 99% (92/93) of resected tumours had optimal TME quality. In 1% (1/93) the mesorectum was nearly complete. None of the removed tumours had an incomplete mesorectum. In 98% (91/93) the circumferential resection margin was negative. Major surgical complications occurred in 17% (18/103). 5% (4/78) of patients with anterior resection had anastomotic leakage. 17% (17/103) developed wound infections. Mortality after elective surgery was 4% (4/95). CONCLUSION: Optimal TME quality results can be achieved in all stages of rectal cancer with a rate of morbidity and mortality comparable to the results from the literature. Future studies should evaluate outcome and local recurrence in accordance to the degree of TME quality. BioMed Central 2010-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3351953/ /pubmed/20696640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-783X-15-7-292 Text en Copyright ©2010 I. Holzapfel Publishers |
spellingShingle | Research Herzog, T Belyaev, O Chromik, AM Weyhe, D Mueller, CA Munding, J Tannapfel, A Uhl, W Seelig, MH TME quality in rectal cancer surgery |
title | TME quality in rectal cancer surgery |
title_full | TME quality in rectal cancer surgery |
title_fullStr | TME quality in rectal cancer surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | TME quality in rectal cancer surgery |
title_short | TME quality in rectal cancer surgery |
title_sort | tme quality in rectal cancer surgery |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3351953/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20696640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-783X-15-7-292 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT herzogt tmequalityinrectalcancersurgery AT belyaevo tmequalityinrectalcancersurgery AT chromikam tmequalityinrectalcancersurgery AT weyhed tmequalityinrectalcancersurgery AT muellerca tmequalityinrectalcancersurgery AT mundingj tmequalityinrectalcancersurgery AT tannapfela tmequalityinrectalcancersurgery AT uhlw tmequalityinrectalcancersurgery AT seeligmh tmequalityinrectalcancersurgery |