Cargando…

Validation of the diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidemia (DHL) knowledge instrument in Malaysia

BACKGROUND: Patient's knowledge on diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidaemia and its medications can be used as one of the outcome measures to assess the effectiveness of educational intervention. To date, no such instrument has been validated in Malaysia. Therefore, the aim of this study was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lai, Pauline SM, Chua, Siew Siang, Tan, Ching Hooi, Chan, Siew Pheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3352255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22361093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-18
_version_ 1782232876959399936
author Lai, Pauline SM
Chua, Siew Siang
Tan, Ching Hooi
Chan, Siew Pheng
author_facet Lai, Pauline SM
Chua, Siew Siang
Tan, Ching Hooi
Chan, Siew Pheng
author_sort Lai, Pauline SM
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient's knowledge on diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidaemia and its medications can be used as one of the outcome measures to assess the effectiveness of educational intervention. To date, no such instrument has been validated in Malaysia. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Diabetes, Hypertension and Hyperlipidemia (DHL) knowledge instrument for assessing the knowledge of patients with type 2 diabetes in Malaysia. METHODS: A 28-item instrument which comprised of 5 domains: diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, medications and general issues was designed and tested. One point was given for every correct answer, whilst zero was given for incorrect answers. Scores ranged from 0 to 28, which were then converted into percentage. This was administered to 77 patients with type 2 diabetes in a tertiary hospital, who were on medication(s) for diabetes and who could understand English (patient group), and to 40 pharmacists (professional group). The DHL knowledge instrument was administered again to the patient group after one month. Excluded were patients less than 18 years old. RESULTS: Flesch reading ease was 60, which is satisfactory, while the mean difficulty factor(SD) was 0.74(0.21), indicating that DHL knowledge instrument was moderately easy. Internal consistency of the instrument was good, with Cronbach's α = 0.791. The test-retest scores showed no significant difference for 26 out of the 28 items, indicating that the questionnaire has achieved stable reliability. The overall mean(SD) knowledge scores was significantly different between the patient and professional groups [74.35(14.88) versus 93.84(6.47), p < 0.001]. This means that the DHL knowledge instrument could differentiate the knowledge levels of participants. The DHL knowledge instrument shows similar psychometric properties as other validated questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: The DHL knowledge instrument shows good promise to be adopted as an instrument for assessing diabetic patients' knowledge concerning their disease conditions and medications in Malaysia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3352255
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33522552012-05-16 Validation of the diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidemia (DHL) knowledge instrument in Malaysia Lai, Pauline SM Chua, Siew Siang Tan, Ching Hooi Chan, Siew Pheng BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Patient's knowledge on diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidaemia and its medications can be used as one of the outcome measures to assess the effectiveness of educational intervention. To date, no such instrument has been validated in Malaysia. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Diabetes, Hypertension and Hyperlipidemia (DHL) knowledge instrument for assessing the knowledge of patients with type 2 diabetes in Malaysia. METHODS: A 28-item instrument which comprised of 5 domains: diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, medications and general issues was designed and tested. One point was given for every correct answer, whilst zero was given for incorrect answers. Scores ranged from 0 to 28, which were then converted into percentage. This was administered to 77 patients with type 2 diabetes in a tertiary hospital, who were on medication(s) for diabetes and who could understand English (patient group), and to 40 pharmacists (professional group). The DHL knowledge instrument was administered again to the patient group after one month. Excluded were patients less than 18 years old. RESULTS: Flesch reading ease was 60, which is satisfactory, while the mean difficulty factor(SD) was 0.74(0.21), indicating that DHL knowledge instrument was moderately easy. Internal consistency of the instrument was good, with Cronbach's α = 0.791. The test-retest scores showed no significant difference for 26 out of the 28 items, indicating that the questionnaire has achieved stable reliability. The overall mean(SD) knowledge scores was significantly different between the patient and professional groups [74.35(14.88) versus 93.84(6.47), p < 0.001]. This means that the DHL knowledge instrument could differentiate the knowledge levels of participants. The DHL knowledge instrument shows similar psychometric properties as other validated questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: The DHL knowledge instrument shows good promise to be adopted as an instrument for assessing diabetic patients' knowledge concerning their disease conditions and medications in Malaysia. BioMed Central 2012-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3352255/ /pubmed/22361093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-18 Text en Copyright ©2012 Lai et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lai, Pauline SM
Chua, Siew Siang
Tan, Ching Hooi
Chan, Siew Pheng
Validation of the diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidemia (DHL) knowledge instrument in Malaysia
title Validation of the diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidemia (DHL) knowledge instrument in Malaysia
title_full Validation of the diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidemia (DHL) knowledge instrument in Malaysia
title_fullStr Validation of the diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidemia (DHL) knowledge instrument in Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidemia (DHL) knowledge instrument in Malaysia
title_short Validation of the diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidemia (DHL) knowledge instrument in Malaysia
title_sort validation of the diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidemia (dhl) knowledge instrument in malaysia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3352255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22361093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-18
work_keys_str_mv AT laipaulinesm validationofthediabeteshypertensionandhyperlipidemiadhlknowledgeinstrumentinmalaysia
AT chuasiewsiang validationofthediabeteshypertensionandhyperlipidemiadhlknowledgeinstrumentinmalaysia
AT tanchinghooi validationofthediabeteshypertensionandhyperlipidemiadhlknowledgeinstrumentinmalaysia
AT chansiewpheng validationofthediabeteshypertensionandhyperlipidemiadhlknowledgeinstrumentinmalaysia