Cargando…

Species-specific responses to landscape fragmentation: implications for management strategies

Habitat fragmentation affects the integrity of many species, but little is known about species-specific sensitivity to fragmentation. Here, we compared the genetic structure of four freshwater fish species differing in their body size (Leuciscus cephalus; Leuciscus leuciscus; Gobio gobio and Phoxinu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blanchet, Simon, Rey, Olivier, Etienne, Roselyne, Lek, Sovan, Loot, Géraldine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3352461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25567925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4571.2009.00110.x
_version_ 1782232913162534912
author Blanchet, Simon
Rey, Olivier
Etienne, Roselyne
Lek, Sovan
Loot, Géraldine
author_facet Blanchet, Simon
Rey, Olivier
Etienne, Roselyne
Lek, Sovan
Loot, Géraldine
author_sort Blanchet, Simon
collection PubMed
description Habitat fragmentation affects the integrity of many species, but little is known about species-specific sensitivity to fragmentation. Here, we compared the genetic structure of four freshwater fish species differing in their body size (Leuciscus cephalus; Leuciscus leuciscus; Gobio gobio and Phoxinus phoxinus) between a fragmented and a continuous landscape. We tested if, overall, fragmentation affected the genetic structure of these fish species, and if these species differed in their sensitivity to fragmentation. Fragmentation negatively affected the genetic structure of these species. Indeed, irrespective of the species identity, allelic richness and heterozygosity were lower, and population divergence was higher in the fragmented than in the continuous landscape. This response to fragmentation was highly species-specific, with the smallest fish species (P. phoxinus) being slightly affected by fragmentation. On the contrary, fish species of intermediate body size (L. leuciscus and G. gobio) were highly affected, whereas the largest fish species (L. cephalus) was intermediately affected by fragmentation. We discuss the relative role of dispersal ability and effective population size on the responses to fragmentation we report here. The weirs studied here are of considerable historical importance. We therefore conclude that restoration programmes will need to consider both this societal context and the biological characteristics of the species sharing this ecosystem.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3352461
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33524612012-05-24 Species-specific responses to landscape fragmentation: implications for management strategies Blanchet, Simon Rey, Olivier Etienne, Roselyne Lek, Sovan Loot, Géraldine Evol Appl Original Articles Habitat fragmentation affects the integrity of many species, but little is known about species-specific sensitivity to fragmentation. Here, we compared the genetic structure of four freshwater fish species differing in their body size (Leuciscus cephalus; Leuciscus leuciscus; Gobio gobio and Phoxinus phoxinus) between a fragmented and a continuous landscape. We tested if, overall, fragmentation affected the genetic structure of these fish species, and if these species differed in their sensitivity to fragmentation. Fragmentation negatively affected the genetic structure of these species. Indeed, irrespective of the species identity, allelic richness and heterozygosity were lower, and population divergence was higher in the fragmented than in the continuous landscape. This response to fragmentation was highly species-specific, with the smallest fish species (P. phoxinus) being slightly affected by fragmentation. On the contrary, fish species of intermediate body size (L. leuciscus and G. gobio) were highly affected, whereas the largest fish species (L. cephalus) was intermediately affected by fragmentation. We discuss the relative role of dispersal ability and effective population size on the responses to fragmentation we report here. The weirs studied here are of considerable historical importance. We therefore conclude that restoration programmes will need to consider both this societal context and the biological characteristics of the species sharing this ecosystem. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2010-05 2010-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3352461/ /pubmed/25567925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4571.2009.00110.x Text en © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
spellingShingle Original Articles
Blanchet, Simon
Rey, Olivier
Etienne, Roselyne
Lek, Sovan
Loot, Géraldine
Species-specific responses to landscape fragmentation: implications for management strategies
title Species-specific responses to landscape fragmentation: implications for management strategies
title_full Species-specific responses to landscape fragmentation: implications for management strategies
title_fullStr Species-specific responses to landscape fragmentation: implications for management strategies
title_full_unstemmed Species-specific responses to landscape fragmentation: implications for management strategies
title_short Species-specific responses to landscape fragmentation: implications for management strategies
title_sort species-specific responses to landscape fragmentation: implications for management strategies
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3352461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25567925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4571.2009.00110.x
work_keys_str_mv AT blanchetsimon speciesspecificresponsestolandscapefragmentationimplicationsformanagementstrategies
AT reyolivier speciesspecificresponsestolandscapefragmentationimplicationsformanagementstrategies
AT etienneroselyne speciesspecificresponsestolandscapefragmentationimplicationsformanagementstrategies
AT leksovan speciesspecificresponsestolandscapefragmentationimplicationsformanagementstrategies
AT lootgeraldine speciesspecificresponsestolandscapefragmentationimplicationsformanagementstrategies