Cargando…
Species-specific responses to landscape fragmentation: implications for management strategies
Habitat fragmentation affects the integrity of many species, but little is known about species-specific sensitivity to fragmentation. Here, we compared the genetic structure of four freshwater fish species differing in their body size (Leuciscus cephalus; Leuciscus leuciscus; Gobio gobio and Phoxinu...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3352461/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25567925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4571.2009.00110.x |
_version_ | 1782232913162534912 |
---|---|
author | Blanchet, Simon Rey, Olivier Etienne, Roselyne Lek, Sovan Loot, Géraldine |
author_facet | Blanchet, Simon Rey, Olivier Etienne, Roselyne Lek, Sovan Loot, Géraldine |
author_sort | Blanchet, Simon |
collection | PubMed |
description | Habitat fragmentation affects the integrity of many species, but little is known about species-specific sensitivity to fragmentation. Here, we compared the genetic structure of four freshwater fish species differing in their body size (Leuciscus cephalus; Leuciscus leuciscus; Gobio gobio and Phoxinus phoxinus) between a fragmented and a continuous landscape. We tested if, overall, fragmentation affected the genetic structure of these fish species, and if these species differed in their sensitivity to fragmentation. Fragmentation negatively affected the genetic structure of these species. Indeed, irrespective of the species identity, allelic richness and heterozygosity were lower, and population divergence was higher in the fragmented than in the continuous landscape. This response to fragmentation was highly species-specific, with the smallest fish species (P. phoxinus) being slightly affected by fragmentation. On the contrary, fish species of intermediate body size (L. leuciscus and G. gobio) were highly affected, whereas the largest fish species (L. cephalus) was intermediately affected by fragmentation. We discuss the relative role of dispersal ability and effective population size on the responses to fragmentation we report here. The weirs studied here are of considerable historical importance. We therefore conclude that restoration programmes will need to consider both this societal context and the biological characteristics of the species sharing this ecosystem. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3352461 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33524612012-05-24 Species-specific responses to landscape fragmentation: implications for management strategies Blanchet, Simon Rey, Olivier Etienne, Roselyne Lek, Sovan Loot, Géraldine Evol Appl Original Articles Habitat fragmentation affects the integrity of many species, but little is known about species-specific sensitivity to fragmentation. Here, we compared the genetic structure of four freshwater fish species differing in their body size (Leuciscus cephalus; Leuciscus leuciscus; Gobio gobio and Phoxinus phoxinus) between a fragmented and a continuous landscape. We tested if, overall, fragmentation affected the genetic structure of these fish species, and if these species differed in their sensitivity to fragmentation. Fragmentation negatively affected the genetic structure of these species. Indeed, irrespective of the species identity, allelic richness and heterozygosity were lower, and population divergence was higher in the fragmented than in the continuous landscape. This response to fragmentation was highly species-specific, with the smallest fish species (P. phoxinus) being slightly affected by fragmentation. On the contrary, fish species of intermediate body size (L. leuciscus and G. gobio) were highly affected, whereas the largest fish species (L. cephalus) was intermediately affected by fragmentation. We discuss the relative role of dispersal ability and effective population size on the responses to fragmentation we report here. The weirs studied here are of considerable historical importance. We therefore conclude that restoration programmes will need to consider both this societal context and the biological characteristics of the species sharing this ecosystem. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2010-05 2010-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3352461/ /pubmed/25567925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4571.2009.00110.x Text en © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Blanchet, Simon Rey, Olivier Etienne, Roselyne Lek, Sovan Loot, Géraldine Species-specific responses to landscape fragmentation: implications for management strategies |
title | Species-specific responses to landscape fragmentation: implications for management strategies |
title_full | Species-specific responses to landscape fragmentation: implications for management strategies |
title_fullStr | Species-specific responses to landscape fragmentation: implications for management strategies |
title_full_unstemmed | Species-specific responses to landscape fragmentation: implications for management strategies |
title_short | Species-specific responses to landscape fragmentation: implications for management strategies |
title_sort | species-specific responses to landscape fragmentation: implications for management strategies |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3352461/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25567925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4571.2009.00110.x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blanchetsimon speciesspecificresponsestolandscapefragmentationimplicationsformanagementstrategies AT reyolivier speciesspecificresponsestolandscapefragmentationimplicationsformanagementstrategies AT etienneroselyne speciesspecificresponsestolandscapefragmentationimplicationsformanagementstrategies AT leksovan speciesspecificresponsestolandscapefragmentationimplicationsformanagementstrategies AT lootgeraldine speciesspecificresponsestolandscapefragmentationimplicationsformanagementstrategies |