Cargando…
Does the FDA have regulatory authority over adult autologous stem cell therapies? 21 CFR 1271 and the emperor's new clothes
FDA has recently asserted that many autologous cell therapies once considered the practice of medicine are in fact drugs. These changes began with the creation of new sections of 21 CFR 1271 and a subsequent one word change where the FDA, without public commentary, altered a single word in its regul...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3353208/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22448812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-10-60 |
_version_ | 1782233011797884928 |
---|---|
author | Freeman, Michael Fuerst, Mitchell |
author_facet | Freeman, Michael Fuerst, Mitchell |
author_sort | Freeman, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | FDA has recently asserted that many autologous cell therapies once considered the practice of medicine are in fact drugs. These changes began with the creation of new sections of 21 CFR 1271 and a subsequent one word change where the FDA, without public commentary, altered a single word in its regulatory language regarding cell and tissue based therapies that asserted the authority to classify autologous tissue as drugs. The bright line between medical care and drug production can be delineated in many ways, but a simple metric that defines the dichotomy is the consent status of the patient. In healthcare, a patient can either be consented individually for a medical procedure or exposed to an unconsented risk where regulatory assurances are already in place. These new FDA policies apply rules meant to keep drugs safe in a drug factory (unconsented mass production risks) to individually consented surgical procedures. We argue that there is little societal benefit to these changes and that they are already stifling medical innovation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3353208 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33532082012-05-16 Does the FDA have regulatory authority over adult autologous stem cell therapies? 21 CFR 1271 and the emperor's new clothes Freeman, Michael Fuerst, Mitchell J Transl Med Commentary FDA has recently asserted that many autologous cell therapies once considered the practice of medicine are in fact drugs. These changes began with the creation of new sections of 21 CFR 1271 and a subsequent one word change where the FDA, without public commentary, altered a single word in its regulatory language regarding cell and tissue based therapies that asserted the authority to classify autologous tissue as drugs. The bright line between medical care and drug production can be delineated in many ways, but a simple metric that defines the dichotomy is the consent status of the patient. In healthcare, a patient can either be consented individually for a medical procedure or exposed to an unconsented risk where regulatory assurances are already in place. These new FDA policies apply rules meant to keep drugs safe in a drug factory (unconsented mass production risks) to individually consented surgical procedures. We argue that there is little societal benefit to these changes and that they are already stifling medical innovation. BioMed Central 2012-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3353208/ /pubmed/22448812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-10-60 Text en Copyright ©2012 Freeman and Fuerst; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Freeman, Michael Fuerst, Mitchell Does the FDA have regulatory authority over adult autologous stem cell therapies? 21 CFR 1271 and the emperor's new clothes |
title | Does the FDA have regulatory authority over adult autologous stem cell therapies? 21 CFR 1271 and the emperor's new clothes |
title_full | Does the FDA have regulatory authority over adult autologous stem cell therapies? 21 CFR 1271 and the emperor's new clothes |
title_fullStr | Does the FDA have regulatory authority over adult autologous stem cell therapies? 21 CFR 1271 and the emperor's new clothes |
title_full_unstemmed | Does the FDA have regulatory authority over adult autologous stem cell therapies? 21 CFR 1271 and the emperor's new clothes |
title_short | Does the FDA have regulatory authority over adult autologous stem cell therapies? 21 CFR 1271 and the emperor's new clothes |
title_sort | does the fda have regulatory authority over adult autologous stem cell therapies? 21 cfr 1271 and the emperor's new clothes |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3353208/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22448812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-10-60 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT freemanmichael doesthefdahaveregulatoryauthorityoveradultautologousstemcelltherapies21cfr1271andtheemperorsnewclothes AT fuerstmitchell doesthefdahaveregulatoryauthorityoveradultautologousstemcelltherapies21cfr1271andtheemperorsnewclothes |