Cargando…

Mapping the coverage of attributes in validated instruments that evaluate primary healthcare from the patient perspective

BACKGROUND: Primary healthcare in developed countries is undergoing important reforms, and these require evaluation strategies to assess how well the population's expectations are being met. Although numerous instruments are available to evaluate primary healthcare (PHC) from the patient perspe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lévesque, Jean-Frédéric, Haggerty, Jeannie, Beninguissé, Gervais, Burge, Frederick, Gass, David, Beaulieu, Marie-Dominique, Pineault, Raynald, Santor, Darcy, Beaulieu, Christine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3353250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22423617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-13-20
_version_ 1782233021662887936
author Lévesque, Jean-Frédéric
Haggerty, Jeannie
Beninguissé, Gervais
Burge, Frederick
Gass, David
Beaulieu, Marie-Dominique
Pineault, Raynald
Santor, Darcy
Beaulieu, Christine
author_facet Lévesque, Jean-Frédéric
Haggerty, Jeannie
Beninguissé, Gervais
Burge, Frederick
Gass, David
Beaulieu, Marie-Dominique
Pineault, Raynald
Santor, Darcy
Beaulieu, Christine
author_sort Lévesque, Jean-Frédéric
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Primary healthcare in developed countries is undergoing important reforms, and these require evaluation strategies to assess how well the population's expectations are being met. Although numerous instruments are available to evaluate primary healthcare (PHC) from the patient perspective, they do not all measure the same range of constructs. To analyze the extent to which important PHC attributes are covered in validated instruments measuring quality of care from the patient perspective. METHOD: We systematically identified validated instruments from the literature and by consulting experts. Using a Delphi consensus-building process, Canadian PHC experts identified and operationally defined 24 important PHC attributes. One team member mapped instrument subscales to these operational definitions; this mapping was then independently validated by members of the research team and conflicts were resolved by the PHC experts. RESULTS: Of the 24 operational definitions, 13 were evaluated as being best measured by patients, 10 by providers, three by administrative databases and one by chart audits (some being best measured by more than one source). Our search retained 17 measurement tools containing 118 subscales. After eliminating redundancies, we mapped 13 unique measurement tools to the PHC attributes. Accessibility, relational continuity, interpersonal communication, management continuity, respectfulness and technical quality of clinical care were the attributes widely covered by available instruments. Advocacy, management of clinical information, comprehensiveness of services, cultural sensitivity, family-centred care, whole-person care and equity were poorly covered. CONCLUSIONS: Validated instruments to evaluate PHC quality from the patient perspective leave many important attributes of PHC uncovered. A complete assessment of PHC quality will require adjusting existing tools and/or developing new instruments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3353250
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33532502012-05-16 Mapping the coverage of attributes in validated instruments that evaluate primary healthcare from the patient perspective Lévesque, Jean-Frédéric Haggerty, Jeannie Beninguissé, Gervais Burge, Frederick Gass, David Beaulieu, Marie-Dominique Pineault, Raynald Santor, Darcy Beaulieu, Christine BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Primary healthcare in developed countries is undergoing important reforms, and these require evaluation strategies to assess how well the population's expectations are being met. Although numerous instruments are available to evaluate primary healthcare (PHC) from the patient perspective, they do not all measure the same range of constructs. To analyze the extent to which important PHC attributes are covered in validated instruments measuring quality of care from the patient perspective. METHOD: We systematically identified validated instruments from the literature and by consulting experts. Using a Delphi consensus-building process, Canadian PHC experts identified and operationally defined 24 important PHC attributes. One team member mapped instrument subscales to these operational definitions; this mapping was then independently validated by members of the research team and conflicts were resolved by the PHC experts. RESULTS: Of the 24 operational definitions, 13 were evaluated as being best measured by patients, 10 by providers, three by administrative databases and one by chart audits (some being best measured by more than one source). Our search retained 17 measurement tools containing 118 subscales. After eliminating redundancies, we mapped 13 unique measurement tools to the PHC attributes. Accessibility, relational continuity, interpersonal communication, management continuity, respectfulness and technical quality of clinical care were the attributes widely covered by available instruments. Advocacy, management of clinical information, comprehensiveness of services, cultural sensitivity, family-centred care, whole-person care and equity were poorly covered. CONCLUSIONS: Validated instruments to evaluate PHC quality from the patient perspective leave many important attributes of PHC uncovered. A complete assessment of PHC quality will require adjusting existing tools and/or developing new instruments. BioMed Central 2012-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3353250/ /pubmed/22423617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-13-20 Text en Copyright ©2012 Lévesque et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lévesque, Jean-Frédéric
Haggerty, Jeannie
Beninguissé, Gervais
Burge, Frederick
Gass, David
Beaulieu, Marie-Dominique
Pineault, Raynald
Santor, Darcy
Beaulieu, Christine
Mapping the coverage of attributes in validated instruments that evaluate primary healthcare from the patient perspective
title Mapping the coverage of attributes in validated instruments that evaluate primary healthcare from the patient perspective
title_full Mapping the coverage of attributes in validated instruments that evaluate primary healthcare from the patient perspective
title_fullStr Mapping the coverage of attributes in validated instruments that evaluate primary healthcare from the patient perspective
title_full_unstemmed Mapping the coverage of attributes in validated instruments that evaluate primary healthcare from the patient perspective
title_short Mapping the coverage of attributes in validated instruments that evaluate primary healthcare from the patient perspective
title_sort mapping the coverage of attributes in validated instruments that evaluate primary healthcare from the patient perspective
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3353250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22423617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-13-20
work_keys_str_mv AT levesquejeanfrederic mappingthecoverageofattributesinvalidatedinstrumentsthatevaluateprimaryhealthcarefromthepatientperspective
AT haggertyjeannie mappingthecoverageofattributesinvalidatedinstrumentsthatevaluateprimaryhealthcarefromthepatientperspective
AT beninguissegervais mappingthecoverageofattributesinvalidatedinstrumentsthatevaluateprimaryhealthcarefromthepatientperspective
AT burgefrederick mappingthecoverageofattributesinvalidatedinstrumentsthatevaluateprimaryhealthcarefromthepatientperspective
AT gassdavid mappingthecoverageofattributesinvalidatedinstrumentsthatevaluateprimaryhealthcarefromthepatientperspective
AT beaulieumariedominique mappingthecoverageofattributesinvalidatedinstrumentsthatevaluateprimaryhealthcarefromthepatientperspective
AT pineaultraynald mappingthecoverageofattributesinvalidatedinstrumentsthatevaluateprimaryhealthcarefromthepatientperspective
AT santordarcy mappingthecoverageofattributesinvalidatedinstrumentsthatevaluateprimaryhealthcarefromthepatientperspective
AT beaulieuchristine mappingthecoverageofattributesinvalidatedinstrumentsthatevaluateprimaryhealthcarefromthepatientperspective