Cargando…

Management of pelvic lymphoceles after radical prostatectomy: A multicentre community based study

INTRODUCTION: Pelvic lymphoceles (LC) following radical prostatectomy (LC-RP) have an incidence up to 27%. LC-managements constitute 50% of surgical interventions performed in post-RP patients. OBJECTIVES: To describe a therapeutic algorithm for LC-managements based on a community based representati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khoder, WY, Trottmann, M, Seitz, M, Buchner, A, Stuber, A, Hoffmann, S, Stief, CG, Becker, AJ
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3353404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21810563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-783X-16-6-280
_version_ 1782233043541426176
author Khoder, WY
Trottmann, M
Seitz, M
Buchner, A
Stuber, A
Hoffmann, S
Stief, CG
Becker, AJ
author_facet Khoder, WY
Trottmann, M
Seitz, M
Buchner, A
Stuber, A
Hoffmann, S
Stief, CG
Becker, AJ
author_sort Khoder, WY
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Pelvic lymphoceles (LC) following radical prostatectomy (LC-RP) have an incidence up to 27%. LC-managements constitute 50% of surgical interventions performed in post-RP patients. OBJECTIVES: To describe a therapeutic algorithm for LC-managements based on a community based representative retrospective study. Patients and methods: Multicentre data from 304 patients with LC-RP were retrospectively examined for LC-managements. RPs were performed by various surgeons from 67 urological departments. All patients had undergone 3 weeks rehabilitation in a specialized hospital where the data base was generated. Indications and results of therapeutic manoeuvres were used to develop a general concept for planning therapy decisions. RESULTS: Median age was 64 years. Complications occurred in 9% (28/304) of patients. Median LC-volume was 36 ml (range 20-1800 ml). There were more complications for LCs with ≥100 ml volume than those < 100 ml (27% versus 17%, p = 0.346). Conservative therapy was the standard in uncomplicated cases (87%, 239 of 276 patients), while intervention was done in 13% (puncture and/or drainage, surgery). Surgical intervention was performed significantly more often in complicated cases (82%, 23 from 28 patients; p < 0.001). Based on these data, LCs can be stratified into 3 groups depending on the size and clinical presentation. Therapeutic decisions were used to develop the illustrated new therapy algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: This study based treatment algorithm provides a rationale approach with an accurate LC-classification as regard the indications and decision making for the available LC-RP-therapies. This could facilitate management decisions. Evaluation of this concept prospectively in large patient cohort is mandatory.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3353404
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33534042012-05-16 Management of pelvic lymphoceles after radical prostatectomy: A multicentre community based study Khoder, WY Trottmann, M Seitz, M Buchner, A Stuber, A Hoffmann, S Stief, CG Becker, AJ Eur J Med Res Research INTRODUCTION: Pelvic lymphoceles (LC) following radical prostatectomy (LC-RP) have an incidence up to 27%. LC-managements constitute 50% of surgical interventions performed in post-RP patients. OBJECTIVES: To describe a therapeutic algorithm for LC-managements based on a community based representative retrospective study. Patients and methods: Multicentre data from 304 patients with LC-RP were retrospectively examined for LC-managements. RPs were performed by various surgeons from 67 urological departments. All patients had undergone 3 weeks rehabilitation in a specialized hospital where the data base was generated. Indications and results of therapeutic manoeuvres were used to develop a general concept for planning therapy decisions. RESULTS: Median age was 64 years. Complications occurred in 9% (28/304) of patients. Median LC-volume was 36 ml (range 20-1800 ml). There were more complications for LCs with ≥100 ml volume than those < 100 ml (27% versus 17%, p = 0.346). Conservative therapy was the standard in uncomplicated cases (87%, 239 of 276 patients), while intervention was done in 13% (puncture and/or drainage, surgery). Surgical intervention was performed significantly more often in complicated cases (82%, 23 from 28 patients; p < 0.001). Based on these data, LCs can be stratified into 3 groups depending on the size and clinical presentation. Therapeutic decisions were used to develop the illustrated new therapy algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: This study based treatment algorithm provides a rationale approach with an accurate LC-classification as regard the indications and decision making for the available LC-RP-therapies. This could facilitate management decisions. Evaluation of this concept prospectively in large patient cohort is mandatory. BioMed Central 2011-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3353404/ /pubmed/21810563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-783X-16-6-280 Text en Copyright ©2011 I. Holzapfel Publishers
spellingShingle Research
Khoder, WY
Trottmann, M
Seitz, M
Buchner, A
Stuber, A
Hoffmann, S
Stief, CG
Becker, AJ
Management of pelvic lymphoceles after radical prostatectomy: A multicentre community based study
title Management of pelvic lymphoceles after radical prostatectomy: A multicentre community based study
title_full Management of pelvic lymphoceles after radical prostatectomy: A multicentre community based study
title_fullStr Management of pelvic lymphoceles after radical prostatectomy: A multicentre community based study
title_full_unstemmed Management of pelvic lymphoceles after radical prostatectomy: A multicentre community based study
title_short Management of pelvic lymphoceles after radical prostatectomy: A multicentre community based study
title_sort management of pelvic lymphoceles after radical prostatectomy: a multicentre community based study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3353404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21810563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-783X-16-6-280
work_keys_str_mv AT khoderwy managementofpelviclymphocelesafterradicalprostatectomyamulticentrecommunitybasedstudy
AT trottmannm managementofpelviclymphocelesafterradicalprostatectomyamulticentrecommunitybasedstudy
AT seitzm managementofpelviclymphocelesafterradicalprostatectomyamulticentrecommunitybasedstudy
AT buchnera managementofpelviclymphocelesafterradicalprostatectomyamulticentrecommunitybasedstudy
AT stubera managementofpelviclymphocelesafterradicalprostatectomyamulticentrecommunitybasedstudy
AT hoffmanns managementofpelviclymphocelesafterradicalprostatectomyamulticentrecommunitybasedstudy
AT stiefcg managementofpelviclymphocelesafterradicalprostatectomyamulticentrecommunitybasedstudy
AT beckeraj managementofpelviclymphocelesafterradicalprostatectomyamulticentrecommunitybasedstudy