Cargando…

Residency and Spatial Use by Reef Sharks of an Isolated Seamount and Its Implications for Conservation

Although marine protected areas (MPAs) are a common conservation strategy, these areas are often designed with little prior knowledge of the spatial behaviour of the species they are designed to protect. Currently, the Coral Sea area and its seamounts (north-east Australia) are under review to deter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barnett, Adam, Abrantes, Kátya G., Seymour, Jamie, Fitzpatrick, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3353940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22615782
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036574
_version_ 1782233123181821952
author Barnett, Adam
Abrantes, Kátya G.
Seymour, Jamie
Fitzpatrick, Richard
author_facet Barnett, Adam
Abrantes, Kátya G.
Seymour, Jamie
Fitzpatrick, Richard
author_sort Barnett, Adam
collection PubMed
description Although marine protected areas (MPAs) are a common conservation strategy, these areas are often designed with little prior knowledge of the spatial behaviour of the species they are designed to protect. Currently, the Coral Sea area and its seamounts (north-east Australia) are under review to determine if MPAs are warranted. The protection of sharks at these seamounts should be an integral component of conservation plans. Therefore, knowledge on the spatial ecology of sharks at the Coral Sea seamounts is essential for the appropriate implementation of management and conservation plans. Acoustic telemetry was used to determine residency, site fidelity and spatial use of three shark species at Osprey Reef: whitetip reef sharks Triaenodon obesus, grey reef sharks Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos and silvertip sharks Carcharhinus albimarginatus. Most individuals showed year round residency at Osprey Reef, although five of the 49 individuals tagged moved to the neighbouring Shark Reef (∼14 km away) and one grey reef shark completed a round trip of ∼250 km to the Great Barrier Reef. Additionally, individuals of white tip and grey reef sharks showed strong site fidelity to the areas they were tagged, and there was low spatial overlap between groups of sharks tagged at different locations. Spatial use at Osprey Reef by adult sharks is generally restricted to the north-west corner. The high residency and limited spatial use of Osprey Reef suggests that reef sharks would be highly vulnerable to targeted fishing pressure and that MPAs incorporating no-take of sharks would be effective in protecting reef shark populations at Osprey and Shark Reef.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3353940
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33539402012-05-21 Residency and Spatial Use by Reef Sharks of an Isolated Seamount and Its Implications for Conservation Barnett, Adam Abrantes, Kátya G. Seymour, Jamie Fitzpatrick, Richard PLoS One Research Article Although marine protected areas (MPAs) are a common conservation strategy, these areas are often designed with little prior knowledge of the spatial behaviour of the species they are designed to protect. Currently, the Coral Sea area and its seamounts (north-east Australia) are under review to determine if MPAs are warranted. The protection of sharks at these seamounts should be an integral component of conservation plans. Therefore, knowledge on the spatial ecology of sharks at the Coral Sea seamounts is essential for the appropriate implementation of management and conservation plans. Acoustic telemetry was used to determine residency, site fidelity and spatial use of three shark species at Osprey Reef: whitetip reef sharks Triaenodon obesus, grey reef sharks Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos and silvertip sharks Carcharhinus albimarginatus. Most individuals showed year round residency at Osprey Reef, although five of the 49 individuals tagged moved to the neighbouring Shark Reef (∼14 km away) and one grey reef shark completed a round trip of ∼250 km to the Great Barrier Reef. Additionally, individuals of white tip and grey reef sharks showed strong site fidelity to the areas they were tagged, and there was low spatial overlap between groups of sharks tagged at different locations. Spatial use at Osprey Reef by adult sharks is generally restricted to the north-west corner. The high residency and limited spatial use of Osprey Reef suggests that reef sharks would be highly vulnerable to targeted fishing pressure and that MPAs incorporating no-take of sharks would be effective in protecting reef shark populations at Osprey and Shark Reef. Public Library of Science 2012-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3353940/ /pubmed/22615782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036574 Text en Barnett et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Barnett, Adam
Abrantes, Kátya G.
Seymour, Jamie
Fitzpatrick, Richard
Residency and Spatial Use by Reef Sharks of an Isolated Seamount and Its Implications for Conservation
title Residency and Spatial Use by Reef Sharks of an Isolated Seamount and Its Implications for Conservation
title_full Residency and Spatial Use by Reef Sharks of an Isolated Seamount and Its Implications for Conservation
title_fullStr Residency and Spatial Use by Reef Sharks of an Isolated Seamount and Its Implications for Conservation
title_full_unstemmed Residency and Spatial Use by Reef Sharks of an Isolated Seamount and Its Implications for Conservation
title_short Residency and Spatial Use by Reef Sharks of an Isolated Seamount and Its Implications for Conservation
title_sort residency and spatial use by reef sharks of an isolated seamount and its implications for conservation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3353940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22615782
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036574
work_keys_str_mv AT barnettadam residencyandspatialusebyreefsharksofanisolatedseamountanditsimplicationsforconservation
AT abranteskatyag residencyandspatialusebyreefsharksofanisolatedseamountanditsimplicationsforconservation
AT seymourjamie residencyandspatialusebyreefsharksofanisolatedseamountanditsimplicationsforconservation
AT fitzpatrickrichard residencyandspatialusebyreefsharksofanisolatedseamountanditsimplicationsforconservation