Cargando…

Comparison of ketamine with fentanyl as co-induction in propofol anesthesia for short surgical procedures

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: A prospective randomized control study was conducted to compare and evaluate quality of anesthesia with ketamine or fentanyl as co-induction with propofol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty ASA I or II, 18–50 year old patients who were scheduled for minor surgeries of short dura...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goyal, Ritu, Singh, Manpreet, Sharma, Jaiprakash
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3354371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22624097
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-5151.94890
_version_ 1782233208267472896
author Goyal, Ritu
Singh, Manpreet
Sharma, Jaiprakash
author_facet Goyal, Ritu
Singh, Manpreet
Sharma, Jaiprakash
author_sort Goyal, Ritu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: A prospective randomized control study was conducted to compare and evaluate quality of anesthesia with ketamine or fentanyl as co-induction with propofol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty ASA I or II, 18–50 year old patients who were scheduled for minor surgeries of short duration (<30 min anticipated duration) were selected. The patients were randomly allocated to group I and group II comprising 30 patients each. The patients of group I were given ketamine injection 0.5 mg/kg and group II patients fentanyl injection (1.5 μg/kg) as co-induction agent. Two minutes later, induction of anesthesia was given with inj propofol (2.5 mg/kg) and appropriate-sized laryngeal mask airway was inserted. The anesthesia was maintained with 60% N(2)O in O(2) and intermittent bolus of inj propofol (0.5 mg/kg) after observing significant changes in the heart rate, blood pressure, lacrimation, sweating, and abnormal movements. RESULTS: There was significant decrease (P<0.05) in the pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure at 1, 3, and 5 min in group II (fentanyl group) whereas the change was insignificant (P>0.05) at 10 min. CONCLUSION: It was observed that ketamine as premedicant was better than fentanyl with respect to hemodynamic stability and caused less adverse effects intraoperatively and postoperatively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3354371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33543712012-05-23 Comparison of ketamine with fentanyl as co-induction in propofol anesthesia for short surgical procedures Goyal, Ritu Singh, Manpreet Sharma, Jaiprakash Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci Original Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: A prospective randomized control study was conducted to compare and evaluate quality of anesthesia with ketamine or fentanyl as co-induction with propofol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty ASA I or II, 18–50 year old patients who were scheduled for minor surgeries of short duration (<30 min anticipated duration) were selected. The patients were randomly allocated to group I and group II comprising 30 patients each. The patients of group I were given ketamine injection 0.5 mg/kg and group II patients fentanyl injection (1.5 μg/kg) as co-induction agent. Two minutes later, induction of anesthesia was given with inj propofol (2.5 mg/kg) and appropriate-sized laryngeal mask airway was inserted. The anesthesia was maintained with 60% N(2)O in O(2) and intermittent bolus of inj propofol (0.5 mg/kg) after observing significant changes in the heart rate, blood pressure, lacrimation, sweating, and abnormal movements. RESULTS: There was significant decrease (P<0.05) in the pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure at 1, 3, and 5 min in group II (fentanyl group) whereas the change was insignificant (P>0.05) at 10 min. CONCLUSION: It was observed that ketamine as premedicant was better than fentanyl with respect to hemodynamic stability and caused less adverse effects intraoperatively and postoperatively. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3354371/ /pubmed/22624097 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-5151.94890 Text en Copyright: © International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Goyal, Ritu
Singh, Manpreet
Sharma, Jaiprakash
Comparison of ketamine with fentanyl as co-induction in propofol anesthesia for short surgical procedures
title Comparison of ketamine with fentanyl as co-induction in propofol anesthesia for short surgical procedures
title_full Comparison of ketamine with fentanyl as co-induction in propofol anesthesia for short surgical procedures
title_fullStr Comparison of ketamine with fentanyl as co-induction in propofol anesthesia for short surgical procedures
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of ketamine with fentanyl as co-induction in propofol anesthesia for short surgical procedures
title_short Comparison of ketamine with fentanyl as co-induction in propofol anesthesia for short surgical procedures
title_sort comparison of ketamine with fentanyl as co-induction in propofol anesthesia for short surgical procedures
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3354371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22624097
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-5151.94890
work_keys_str_mv AT goyalritu comparisonofketaminewithfentanylascoinductioninpropofolanesthesiaforshortsurgicalprocedures
AT singhmanpreet comparisonofketaminewithfentanylascoinductioninpropofolanesthesiaforshortsurgicalprocedures
AT sharmajaiprakash comparisonofketaminewithfentanylascoinductioninpropofolanesthesiaforshortsurgicalprocedures