Cargando…

Characterization and Comparison of the 10-2 SITA-Standard and Fast Algorithms

Purpose: To compare the 10-2 SITA-standard and SITA-fast visual field programs in patients with glaucoma. Methods: We enrolled 26 patients with open angle glaucoma with involvement of at least one paracentral location on 24-2 SITA-standard field test. Each subject performed 10-2 SITA-standard and SI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barkana, Yaniv, Bakshi, Erez, Goldich, Yakov, Morad, Yair, Kaplan, Audrey, Avni, Isaac, Zadok, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Scientific World Journal 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3354663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22654632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/821802
_version_ 1782233254768672768
author Barkana, Yaniv
Bakshi, Erez
Goldich, Yakov
Morad, Yair
Kaplan, Audrey
Avni, Isaac
Zadok, David
author_facet Barkana, Yaniv
Bakshi, Erez
Goldich, Yakov
Morad, Yair
Kaplan, Audrey
Avni, Isaac
Zadok, David
author_sort Barkana, Yaniv
collection PubMed
description Purpose: To compare the 10-2 SITA-standard and SITA-fast visual field programs in patients with glaucoma. Methods: We enrolled 26 patients with open angle glaucoma with involvement of at least one paracentral location on 24-2 SITA-standard field test. Each subject performed 10-2 SITA-standard and SITA-fast tests. Within 2 months this sequence of tests was repeated. Results: SITA-fast was 30% shorter than SITA-standard (5.5 ± 1.1 vs 7.9 ± 1.1 minutes, P < 0.001). Mean MD was statistically significantly higher for SITA-standard compared with SITA-fast at first visit (Δ = 0.3 dB, P = 0.017) but not second visit. Inter-visit difference in MD or in number of depressed points was not significant for both programs. Bland-Altman analysis showed that clinically significant variations can exist in individual instances between the 2 programs and between repeat tests with the same program. Conclusions: The 10-2 SITA-fast algorithm is significantly shorter than SITA-standard. The two programs have similar long-term variability. Average same-visit between-program and same-program between-visit sensitivity results were similar for the study population, but clinically significant variability was observed for some individual test pairs. Group inter- and intra-program test results may be comparable, but in the management of the individual patient field change should be verified by repeat testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3354663
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher The Scientific World Journal
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33546632012-05-31 Characterization and Comparison of the 10-2 SITA-Standard and Fast Algorithms Barkana, Yaniv Bakshi, Erez Goldich, Yakov Morad, Yair Kaplan, Audrey Avni, Isaac Zadok, David ScientificWorldJournal Clinical Study Purpose: To compare the 10-2 SITA-standard and SITA-fast visual field programs in patients with glaucoma. Methods: We enrolled 26 patients with open angle glaucoma with involvement of at least one paracentral location on 24-2 SITA-standard field test. Each subject performed 10-2 SITA-standard and SITA-fast tests. Within 2 months this sequence of tests was repeated. Results: SITA-fast was 30% shorter than SITA-standard (5.5 ± 1.1 vs 7.9 ± 1.1 minutes, P < 0.001). Mean MD was statistically significantly higher for SITA-standard compared with SITA-fast at first visit (Δ = 0.3 dB, P = 0.017) but not second visit. Inter-visit difference in MD or in number of depressed points was not significant for both programs. Bland-Altman analysis showed that clinically significant variations can exist in individual instances between the 2 programs and between repeat tests with the same program. Conclusions: The 10-2 SITA-fast algorithm is significantly shorter than SITA-standard. The two programs have similar long-term variability. Average same-visit between-program and same-program between-visit sensitivity results were similar for the study population, but clinically significant variability was observed for some individual test pairs. Group inter- and intra-program test results may be comparable, but in the management of the individual patient field change should be verified by repeat testing. The Scientific World Journal 2012-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3354663/ /pubmed/22654632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/821802 Text en Copyright © 2012 Yaniv Barkana et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Barkana, Yaniv
Bakshi, Erez
Goldich, Yakov
Morad, Yair
Kaplan, Audrey
Avni, Isaac
Zadok, David
Characterization and Comparison of the 10-2 SITA-Standard and Fast Algorithms
title Characterization and Comparison of the 10-2 SITA-Standard and Fast Algorithms
title_full Characterization and Comparison of the 10-2 SITA-Standard and Fast Algorithms
title_fullStr Characterization and Comparison of the 10-2 SITA-Standard and Fast Algorithms
title_full_unstemmed Characterization and Comparison of the 10-2 SITA-Standard and Fast Algorithms
title_short Characterization and Comparison of the 10-2 SITA-Standard and Fast Algorithms
title_sort characterization and comparison of the 10-2 sita-standard and fast algorithms
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3354663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22654632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/821802
work_keys_str_mv AT barkanayaniv characterizationandcomparisonofthe102sitastandardandfastalgorithms
AT bakshierez characterizationandcomparisonofthe102sitastandardandfastalgorithms
AT goldichyakov characterizationandcomparisonofthe102sitastandardandfastalgorithms
AT moradyair characterizationandcomparisonofthe102sitastandardandfastalgorithms
AT kaplanaudrey characterizationandcomparisonofthe102sitastandardandfastalgorithms
AT avniisaac characterizationandcomparisonofthe102sitastandardandfastalgorithms
AT zadokdavid characterizationandcomparisonofthe102sitastandardandfastalgorithms