Cargando…

The Relationship between Trabecular Bone Structure Modeling Methods and the Elastic Modulus as Calculated by FEM

Trabecular bone cores were collected from the femoral head at the time of surgery (hip arthroplasty). Investigated were 42 specimens, from patients with osteoporosis and coxarthrosis. The cores were scanned used computer microtomography (microCT) system at an isotropic spatial resolution of 36 micro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Topoliński, Tomasz, Cichański, Artur, Mazurkiewicz, Adam, Nowicki, Krzysztof
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Scientific World Journal 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3354692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22629210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/827196
_version_ 1782233260606095360
author Topoliński, Tomasz
Cichański, Artur
Mazurkiewicz, Adam
Nowicki, Krzysztof
author_facet Topoliński, Tomasz
Cichański, Artur
Mazurkiewicz, Adam
Nowicki, Krzysztof
author_sort Topoliński, Tomasz
collection PubMed
description Trabecular bone cores were collected from the femoral head at the time of surgery (hip arthroplasty). Investigated were 42 specimens, from patients with osteoporosis and coxarthrosis. The cores were scanned used computer microtomography (microCT) system at an isotropic spatial resolution of 36 microns. Image stacks were converted to finite element models via a bone voxel-to-element algorithm. The apparent modulus was calculated based on the assumptions that for the elastic properties, E = 10 MPa and ν = 0.3. The compressive deformation as calculated by finite elements (FE) analysis was 0.8%. The models were coarsened to effectively change the resolution or voxel size (from 72 microns to 288 microns or from 72 microns to 1080 microns). The aim of our study is to determine how an increase in the distance between scans changes the elastic properties as calculated by FE models. We tried to find a border value voxel size at which the module values were possible to calculate. As the voxel size increased, the mean voxel volume increased and the FEA-derived apparent modulus decreased. The slope of voxel size versus modulus relationship correlated with several architectural indices of trabecular bone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3354692
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher The Scientific World Journal
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33546922012-05-24 The Relationship between Trabecular Bone Structure Modeling Methods and the Elastic Modulus as Calculated by FEM Topoliński, Tomasz Cichański, Artur Mazurkiewicz, Adam Nowicki, Krzysztof ScientificWorldJournal Research Article Trabecular bone cores were collected from the femoral head at the time of surgery (hip arthroplasty). Investigated were 42 specimens, from patients with osteoporosis and coxarthrosis. The cores were scanned used computer microtomography (microCT) system at an isotropic spatial resolution of 36 microns. Image stacks were converted to finite element models via a bone voxel-to-element algorithm. The apparent modulus was calculated based on the assumptions that for the elastic properties, E = 10 MPa and ν = 0.3. The compressive deformation as calculated by finite elements (FE) analysis was 0.8%. The models were coarsened to effectively change the resolution or voxel size (from 72 microns to 288 microns or from 72 microns to 1080 microns). The aim of our study is to determine how an increase in the distance between scans changes the elastic properties as calculated by FE models. We tried to find a border value voxel size at which the module values were possible to calculate. As the voxel size increased, the mean voxel volume increased and the FEA-derived apparent modulus decreased. The slope of voxel size versus modulus relationship correlated with several architectural indices of trabecular bone. The Scientific World Journal 2012-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3354692/ /pubmed/22629210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/827196 Text en Copyright © 2012 Tomasz Topoliński et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Topoliński, Tomasz
Cichański, Artur
Mazurkiewicz, Adam
Nowicki, Krzysztof
The Relationship between Trabecular Bone Structure Modeling Methods and the Elastic Modulus as Calculated by FEM
title The Relationship between Trabecular Bone Structure Modeling Methods and the Elastic Modulus as Calculated by FEM
title_full The Relationship between Trabecular Bone Structure Modeling Methods and the Elastic Modulus as Calculated by FEM
title_fullStr The Relationship between Trabecular Bone Structure Modeling Methods and the Elastic Modulus as Calculated by FEM
title_full_unstemmed The Relationship between Trabecular Bone Structure Modeling Methods and the Elastic Modulus as Calculated by FEM
title_short The Relationship between Trabecular Bone Structure Modeling Methods and the Elastic Modulus as Calculated by FEM
title_sort relationship between trabecular bone structure modeling methods and the elastic modulus as calculated by fem
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3354692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22629210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/827196
work_keys_str_mv AT topolinskitomasz therelationshipbetweentrabecularbonestructuremodelingmethodsandtheelasticmodulusascalculatedbyfem
AT cichanskiartur therelationshipbetweentrabecularbonestructuremodelingmethodsandtheelasticmodulusascalculatedbyfem
AT mazurkiewiczadam therelationshipbetweentrabecularbonestructuremodelingmethodsandtheelasticmodulusascalculatedbyfem
AT nowickikrzysztof therelationshipbetweentrabecularbonestructuremodelingmethodsandtheelasticmodulusascalculatedbyfem
AT topolinskitomasz relationshipbetweentrabecularbonestructuremodelingmethodsandtheelasticmodulusascalculatedbyfem
AT cichanskiartur relationshipbetweentrabecularbonestructuremodelingmethodsandtheelasticmodulusascalculatedbyfem
AT mazurkiewiczadam relationshipbetweentrabecularbonestructuremodelingmethodsandtheelasticmodulusascalculatedbyfem
AT nowickikrzysztof relationshipbetweentrabecularbonestructuremodelingmethodsandtheelasticmodulusascalculatedbyfem