Cargando…
Comparative effectiveness of antihypertensive medication for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: systematic review and multiple treatments meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: We conducted a systematic review of evidence from randomized controlled trials to answer the following research question: What are the relative effects of different classes of antihypertensive drugs in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular disease outcomes for healthy people at risk o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3354999/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22480336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-10-33 |
_version_ | 1782233303118512128 |
---|---|
author | Fretheim, Atle Odgaard-Jensen, Jan Brørs, Odd Madsen, Steinar Njølstad, Inger Norheim, Ole F Svilaas, Arne Kristiansen, Ivar S Thürmer, Hanne Flottorp, Signe |
author_facet | Fretheim, Atle Odgaard-Jensen, Jan Brørs, Odd Madsen, Steinar Njølstad, Inger Norheim, Ole F Svilaas, Arne Kristiansen, Ivar S Thürmer, Hanne Flottorp, Signe |
author_sort | Fretheim, Atle |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We conducted a systematic review of evidence from randomized controlled trials to answer the following research question: What are the relative effects of different classes of antihypertensive drugs in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular disease outcomes for healthy people at risk of cardiovascular disease? METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED (up to February 2011) and CENTRAL (up to May 2009), and reference lists in recent systematic reviews. Titles and abstracts were assessed for relevance and those potentially fulfilling our inclusion criteria were then assessed in full text. Two reviewers made independent assessments at each step. We selected the following main outcomes: total mortality, myocardial infarction and stroke. We also report on angina, heart failure and incidence of diabetes. We conducted a multiple treatments meta-analysis using random-effects models. We assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE-instrument. RESULTS: We included 25 trials. Overall, the results were mixed, with few significant dif-ferences, and with no drug-class standing out as superior across multiple outcomes. The only significant finding for total mortality based on moderate to high quality evidence was that beta-blockers (atenolol) were inferior to angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) (relative risk (RR) 1.14; 95% credibility interval (CrI) 1.02 to 1.28). Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors came out inferior to calcium-channel blockers (CCB) regarding stroke-risk (RR 1.19; 1.03 to 1.38), but superior regarding risk of heart failure (RR 0.82; 0.69 to 0.94), both based on moderate quality evidence. Diuretics reduced the risk of myocardial infarction compared to beta-blockers (RR 0.82; 0.68 to 0.98), and lowered the risk of heart failure compared to CCB (RR 0.73; 0.62 to 0.84), beta-blockers (RR 0.73; 0.54 to 0.96), and alpha-blockers (RR 0.51; 0.40 to 0.64). The risk of diabetes increased with diuretics compared to ACE-inhibitors (RR 1.43; 1.12 to 1.83) and CCB (RR 1.27; 1.05 to 1.57). CONCLUSION: Based on the available evidence, there seems to be little or no difference between commonly used blood pressure lowering medications for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Beta-blockers (atenolol) and alpha-blockers may not be first-choice drugs as they were the only drug-classes that were not significantly superior to any other, for any outcomes. Review registration: CRD database ("PROSPERO") CRD42011001066 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3354999 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33549992012-05-18 Comparative effectiveness of antihypertensive medication for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: systematic review and multiple treatments meta-analysis Fretheim, Atle Odgaard-Jensen, Jan Brørs, Odd Madsen, Steinar Njølstad, Inger Norheim, Ole F Svilaas, Arne Kristiansen, Ivar S Thürmer, Hanne Flottorp, Signe BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: We conducted a systematic review of evidence from randomized controlled trials to answer the following research question: What are the relative effects of different classes of antihypertensive drugs in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular disease outcomes for healthy people at risk of cardiovascular disease? METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED (up to February 2011) and CENTRAL (up to May 2009), and reference lists in recent systematic reviews. Titles and abstracts were assessed for relevance and those potentially fulfilling our inclusion criteria were then assessed in full text. Two reviewers made independent assessments at each step. We selected the following main outcomes: total mortality, myocardial infarction and stroke. We also report on angina, heart failure and incidence of diabetes. We conducted a multiple treatments meta-analysis using random-effects models. We assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE-instrument. RESULTS: We included 25 trials. Overall, the results were mixed, with few significant dif-ferences, and with no drug-class standing out as superior across multiple outcomes. The only significant finding for total mortality based on moderate to high quality evidence was that beta-blockers (atenolol) were inferior to angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) (relative risk (RR) 1.14; 95% credibility interval (CrI) 1.02 to 1.28). Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors came out inferior to calcium-channel blockers (CCB) regarding stroke-risk (RR 1.19; 1.03 to 1.38), but superior regarding risk of heart failure (RR 0.82; 0.69 to 0.94), both based on moderate quality evidence. Diuretics reduced the risk of myocardial infarction compared to beta-blockers (RR 0.82; 0.68 to 0.98), and lowered the risk of heart failure compared to CCB (RR 0.73; 0.62 to 0.84), beta-blockers (RR 0.73; 0.54 to 0.96), and alpha-blockers (RR 0.51; 0.40 to 0.64). The risk of diabetes increased with diuretics compared to ACE-inhibitors (RR 1.43; 1.12 to 1.83) and CCB (RR 1.27; 1.05 to 1.57). CONCLUSION: Based on the available evidence, there seems to be little or no difference between commonly used blood pressure lowering medications for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Beta-blockers (atenolol) and alpha-blockers may not be first-choice drugs as they were the only drug-classes that were not significantly superior to any other, for any outcomes. Review registration: CRD database ("PROSPERO") CRD42011001066 BioMed Central 2012-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3354999/ /pubmed/22480336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-10-33 Text en Copyright ©2012 Fretheim et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Fretheim, Atle Odgaard-Jensen, Jan Brørs, Odd Madsen, Steinar Njølstad, Inger Norheim, Ole F Svilaas, Arne Kristiansen, Ivar S Thürmer, Hanne Flottorp, Signe Comparative effectiveness of antihypertensive medication for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: systematic review and multiple treatments meta-analysis |
title | Comparative effectiveness of antihypertensive medication for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: systematic review and multiple treatments meta-analysis |
title_full | Comparative effectiveness of antihypertensive medication for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: systematic review and multiple treatments meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparative effectiveness of antihypertensive medication for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: systematic review and multiple treatments meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative effectiveness of antihypertensive medication for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: systematic review and multiple treatments meta-analysis |
title_short | Comparative effectiveness of antihypertensive medication for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: systematic review and multiple treatments meta-analysis |
title_sort | comparative effectiveness of antihypertensive medication for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: systematic review and multiple treatments meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3354999/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22480336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-10-33 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fretheimatle comparativeeffectivenessofantihypertensivemedicationforprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseasesystematicreviewandmultipletreatmentsmetaanalysis AT odgaardjensenjan comparativeeffectivenessofantihypertensivemedicationforprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseasesystematicreviewandmultipletreatmentsmetaanalysis AT brørsodd comparativeeffectivenessofantihypertensivemedicationforprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseasesystematicreviewandmultipletreatmentsmetaanalysis AT madsensteinar comparativeeffectivenessofantihypertensivemedicationforprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseasesystematicreviewandmultipletreatmentsmetaanalysis AT njølstadinger comparativeeffectivenessofantihypertensivemedicationforprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseasesystematicreviewandmultipletreatmentsmetaanalysis AT norheimolef comparativeeffectivenessofantihypertensivemedicationforprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseasesystematicreviewandmultipletreatmentsmetaanalysis AT svilaasarne comparativeeffectivenessofantihypertensivemedicationforprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseasesystematicreviewandmultipletreatmentsmetaanalysis AT kristiansenivars comparativeeffectivenessofantihypertensivemedicationforprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseasesystematicreviewandmultipletreatmentsmetaanalysis AT thurmerhanne comparativeeffectivenessofantihypertensivemedicationforprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseasesystematicreviewandmultipletreatmentsmetaanalysis AT flottorpsigne comparativeeffectivenessofantihypertensivemedicationforprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseasesystematicreviewandmultipletreatmentsmetaanalysis |